Commit Graph

157 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Crichton
7bf58c2baa Modify IoFactory's fs_mkdir, and add fs_rename
The invocation for making a directory should be able to specify a mode to make
the directory with (instead of defaulting to one particular mode). Additionally,
libuv and various OSes implement efficient versions of renaming files, so this
operation is exposed as an IoFactory call.
2013-11-03 15:15:41 -08:00
Chris Morgan
0369a41f0e Rename files to match current recommendations.
New standards have arisen in recent months, mostly for the use of
rustpkg, but the main Rust codebase has not been altered to match these
new specifications. This changeset rectifies most of these issues.

- Renamed the crate source files `src/libX/X.rs` to `lib.rs`, for
  consistency with current styles; this affects extra, rustc, rustdoc,
  rustpkg, rustuv, std, syntax.

- Renamed `X/X.rs` to `X/mod.rs,` as is now recommended style, for
  `std::num` and `std::terminfo`.

- Shifted `src/libstd/str/ascii.rs` out of the otherwise unused `str`
  directory, to be consistent with its import path of `std::ascii`;
  libstd is flat at present so it's more appropriate thus.

While this removes some `#[path = "..."]` directives, it does not remove
all of them, and leaves certain other inconsistencies, such as `std::u8`
et al. which are actually stored in `src/libstd/num/` (one subdirectory
down). No quorum has been reached on this issue, so I felt it best to
leave them all alone at present. #9208 deals with the possibility of
making libstd more hierarchical (such as changing the crate to match the
current filesystem structure, which would make the module path
`std::num::u8`).

There is one thing remaining in which this repository is not
rustpkg-compliant: rustpkg would have `src/std/` et al. rather than
`src/libstd/` et al. I have not endeavoured to change that at this point
as it would guarantee prompt bitrot and confusion. A change of that
magnitude needs to be discussed first.
2013-11-03 23:49:01 +11:00
Alex Crichton
0ce1b2f04d Statically link libuv to librustuv
Similarly to the previous commit, libuv is only used by this library, so there's
no need for it to be linked into librustrt and available to all crates by
default.
2013-11-02 21:28:17 -07:00
Marvin Löbel
0d92c53f4a Reordered the methods in std::Option and std::Result
Cleaned up the source in a few places

Renamed `map_move` to `map`, removed other `map` methods

Added `as_ref` and `as_mut` adapters to `Result`

Added `fmt::Default` impl
2013-11-01 15:00:46 +01:00
Alex Crichton
452e5cdf11 Make Writer::flush a no-op default method
Closes #9126
2013-10-30 15:17:11 -07:00
Alex Crichton
e203f30bc7 Register new snapshots 2013-10-29 15:56:16 -07:00
Alex Crichton
201cab84e8 Move rust's uv implementation to its own crate
There are a few reasons that this is a desirable move to take:

1. Proof of concept that a third party event loop is possible
2. Clear separation of responsibility between rt::io and the uv-backend
3. Enforce in the future that the event loop is "pluggable" and replacable

Here's a quick summary of the points of this pull request which make this
possible:

* Two new lang items were introduced: event_loop, and event_loop_factory.
  The idea of a "factory" is to define a function which can be called with no
  arguments and will return the new event loop as a trait object. This factory
  is emitted to the crate map when building an executable. The factory doesn't
  have to exist, and when it doesn't then an empty slot is in the crate map and
  a basic event loop with no I/O support is provided to the runtime.

* When building an executable, then the rustuv crate will be linked by default
  (providing a default implementation of the event loop) via a similar method to
  injecting a dependency on libstd. This is currently the only location where
  the rustuv crate is ever linked.

* There is a new #[no_uv] attribute (implied by #[no_std]) which denies
  implicitly linking to rustuv by default

Closes #5019
2013-10-29 08:39:22 -07:00