Support 128-bit atomics on all aarch64 targets
Some aarch64 targets currently set `max_atomic_width` to 64, but aarch64 always supports 128-bit atomics.
r? `@Amanieu`
Fix nonsense non-tupled `Fn` trait error
Given this code:
```rust
#![feature(unboxed_closures)]
fn a<F: Fn<usize>>(f: F) {}
fn main() {
a(|_: usize| {});
}
```
We currently emit this error:
```
error[E0631]: type mismatch in closure arguments
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | a(|_: usize| {});
| ^ ---------- found signature of `fn(usize) -> _`
| |
| expected signature of `fn(usize) -> _`
|
note: required by a bound in `a`
--> src/main.rs:3:9
|
3 | fn a<F: Fn<usize>>(f: F) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `a`
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0631`.
error: could not compile `playground` due to previous error
```
Notably, it says the same thing for "expected" and "found"!
Fix the output so that we instead emit:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> /home/gh-compiler-errors/test.rs:6:5
|
6 | a(|_: usize| {});
| ^ types differ
|
= note: expected trait `Fn<usize>`
found trait `Fn<(usize,)>`
note: required by a bound in `a`
--> /home/gh-compiler-errors/test.rs:3:9
|
3 | fn a<F: Fn<usize>>(f: F) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `a`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
The error could still use some work, namely the "mismatched types" part, but I'm leaving it a bit rough since the only way you'd ever get this error is when you're messing with `#![feature(unboxed_closures)]`.
Simply making sure we actually print out the difference in trait-refs is good enough for me. I could probably factor in some additional improvements if those are desired.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100338 (when there are 3 or more return statements in the loop)
- #100384 (Add support for generating unique profraw files by default when using `-C instrument-coverage`)
- #100460 (Update the minimum external LLVM to 13)
- #100567 (Add missing closing quote)
- #100590 (Suggest adding an array length if possible)
- #100600 (Rename Machine memory hooks to suggest when they run)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename Machine memory hooks to suggest when they run
Some of the other memory hooks start with `before_` or `after_` to indicate that they run before or after a certain operation. These don't, so I was a bit confused as to when they are supposed to run.
`memory_read` can be read two ways in English, "memory was read" or "this is a memory read" so without the prefix this was especially ambiguous.
Update the minimum external LLVM to 13
With this change, we'll have stable support for LLVM 13 through 15 (pending release).
For reference, the previous increase to LLVM 12 was #90175.
r? `@nagisa`
Add support for generating unique profraw files by default when using `-C instrument-coverage`
Currently, enabling the rustc flag `-C instrument-coverage` instruments the given crate and by default uses the naming scheme `default.profraw` for any instrumented profile files generated during the execution of a binary linked against this crate. This leads to multiple binaries being executed overwriting one another and causing only the last executable run to contain actual coverage results.
This can be overridden by manually setting the environment variable `LLVM_PROFILE_FILE` to use a unique naming scheme.
This PR adds a change to add support for a reasonable default for rustc to use when enabling coverage instrumentation similar to how the Rust compiler treats generating these same `profraw` files when PGO is enabled.
The new naming scheme is set to `default_%m_%p.profraw` to ensure the uniqueness of each file being generated using [LLVMs special pattern strings](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.html#running-the-instrumented-program).
Today the compiler sets the default for PGO `profraw` files to `default_%m.profraw` to ensure a unique file for each run. The same can be done for the instrumented profile files generated via the `-C instrument-coverage` flag as well which LLVM has API support for.
Linked Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100381
r? `@wesleywiser`
when there are 3 or more return statements in the loop
emit the first 3 errors and duplicated diagnostic information
modified: compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/coercion.rs
new file: src/test/ui/typeck/issue-100285.rs
new file: src/test/ui/typeck/issue-100285.stderr
- Rename `ast::Lit::token` as `ast::Lit::token_lit`, because its type is
`token::Lit`, which is not a token. (This has been confusing me for a
long time.)
reasonable because we have an `ast::token::Lit` inside an `ast::Lit`.
- Rename `LitKind::{from,to}_lit_token` as
`LitKind::{from,to}_token_lit`, to match the above change and
`token::Lit`.
There is some redundancy here, but the extra assertions make it easier
to keep track of relative things, e.g. `ExprKind` is the biggest part
of `Expr`.
Remove manual implementations of HashStable for hir::Expr and hir::Ty.
We do not need to force hashing HIR bodies inside those nodes. The contents of bodies are not accessible from the `hir_owner` query which used `hash_without_bodies`. When the content of a body is required, the access is still done using `hir_owner_nodes`, which continues hashing HIR bodies.
emit the first 3 errors and duplicated diagnostic information
using take of iterator for the first third return
modified: compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/coercion.rs
new file: src/test/ui/typeck/issue-100285.rs
new file: src/test/ui/typeck/issue-100285.stderr
Reland changes replacing num_cpus with available_parallelism
Since #97925 added cgroupv1 support the problem in #97549 which lead to the previous revert should be addressed now.
Cargo has reapplied the replacement too https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/10969
Reverts 1ae4b258267462da0b1aae1badcf83578153c799 (part of #97911)
Relands #94524
Support 1st group of RISC-V Bitmanip backend target features
These target features use the same names as LLVM and `is_riscv_feature_detected!`, they are:
- zba (address generation instructions)
- zbb (basic bit manipulation)
- zbc (carry-less multiplication)
- zbs (single-bit manipulation)
The extension is frozen and ratified, and I don't think we should expect LLVM to change those feature names in the future.
For reference, the specification for the B extension can be found here: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf)
On my current project, I see a 7.6% reduction in binary size with these features on, so I have some incentive to try to silence the "unknown feature" warning from `-Ctarget-feature` =)
Adjust span of fn argument declaration
Span of a fn argument declaration goes from:
```
fn foo(i : i32 , ...)
^^^^^^^^
```
to:
```
fn foo(i : i32 , ...)
^^^^^^^
```
That is, we don't include the extra spacing up to the trailing comma, which I think is more correct.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99646#discussion_r944568074
r? ``@estebank``
---
The two tests that had dramatic changes in their rendering I think actually are improved, though they are kinda poor spans both before and after the changes. 🤷 Thoughts?
