Commit Graph

143436 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bjorn3
8260b8325c Use TargetTriple::from_path in rustdoc 2021-05-16 10:27:06 +02:00
bors
69b352ef77 Auto merge of #85233 - FabianWolff:issue-85227, r=petrochenkov
Improve error message for non-exhaustive matches on non-exhaustive enums

This pull request fixes #85227. For an enum marked with `#[non_exhaustive]` and not defined in the current crate, the error message for non-exhaustive matches now mentions the fact that the enum is marked as non-exhaustive:
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `_` not covered
  --> main.rs:12:11
   |
12 |     match e {
   |           ^ pattern `_` not covered
   |
   = help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
   = note: the matched value is of type `E`, which is marked as non-exhaustive
```
2021-05-14 06:53:45 +00:00
bors
91f2e2d218 Auto merge of #85190 - mati865:update-cc, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Update cc crate

To pull in this fix: 801a87bf2f
2021-05-14 04:12:40 +00:00
bors
754d17121d Auto merge of #85195 - Mark-Simulacrum:variant-by-idx, r=petrochenkov
Store VariantIdx to distinguish enum variants

This saves ~24% of the instructions on the match-stress-enum benchmark, but I'm not 100% sure that this is OK - if we ever compare two constructors across enums (e.g., a Result and an Option), then this is obviously insufficient; I can experiment with continuing to store the DefId for comparison purposes in that case.
2021-05-14 00:59:01 +00:00
bors
17f30e5451 Auto merge of #84107 - Amanieu:global_asm2, r=nagisa
Add support for const operands and options to global_asm!

On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!.

Currently `global_asm!` only supports `const` operands and the `att_syntax` option. In the future, `sym` operands will also be supported. However there is no plan to support any of the other operand types or options since they don't make sense in the context of `global_asm!`.

r? `@nagisa`
2021-05-13 22:17:43 +00:00
Amanieu d'Antras
a7ed6a5196 Fix tests 2021-05-13 23:09:54 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
d9cf2ce28f Update compiler_builtins to 0.1.43 2021-05-13 22:32:44 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
40d9da4d8c global_asm! consts do not depend on other items 2021-05-13 22:31:58 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
bb6bec1d55 Clarify error message when both asm! and global_asm! are unsupported 2021-05-13 22:31:58 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
0df83f8e5e Update global_asm! documentation 2021-05-13 22:31:58 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
5a229e0e20 Add tests for global_asm! 2021-05-13 22:31:58 +01:00
Amanieu d'Antras
5918ee4317 Add support for const operands and options to global_asm!
On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!
2021-05-13 22:31:57 +01:00
bors
6d395a1c29 Auto merge of #85186 - nikomatsakis:issue-83538-polluted-cache, r=jackh726
have on_completion record subcycles

have on_completion record subcycles

Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).

This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:

* A depends on...
   * B depends on A
   * C depends on...
       * D depends on C
 * T: 'static

then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".

In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".

Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.

Fixes #83538

r? `@Aaron1011`
2021-05-13 19:36:46 +00:00
bors
952c5732c2 Auto merge of #85258 - GuillaumeGomez:rollup-kzay7o5, r=GuillaumeGomez
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #85068 (Fix diagnostic for cross crate private tuple struct constructors)
 - #85175 (Rustdoc cleanup)
 - #85177 (add BITS associated constant to core::num::Wrapping)
 - #85240 (Don't suggest adding `'static` lifetime to arguments)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-05-13 16:06:08 +00:00
Guillaume Gomez
3761ada94e
Rollup merge of #85240 - Aaron1011:no-suggest-static, r=davidtwco
Don't suggest adding `'static` lifetime to arguments

Fixes #69350

This is almost always the wrong this to do
2021-05-13 15:54:14 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
16c825485f
Rollup merge of #85177 - tspiteri:wrapping-bits, r=joshtriplett
add BITS associated constant to core::num::Wrapping

This keeps `Wrapping` synchronized with the primitives it wraps as for the #32463 `wrapping_int_impl` feature.
2021-05-13 15:54:13 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
5aa40dda85
Rollup merge of #85175 - GuillaumeGomez:rustdoc-cleanup, r=jsha
Rustdoc cleanup

Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83332. The goal of this PR is to remove a few unused things:

 * The "loading content" things are now unneeded.
 * Some toggle CSS rules were still there.
 * Some parts of the JS had a different indent, fixed it.

r? `@jsha`
2021-05-13 15:54:11 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
3db335b934
Rollup merge of #85068 - luqmana:78708-xcrate-diag, r=estebank
Fix diagnostic for cross crate private tuple struct constructors

Fixes #78708.

There was already some limited support for certain cross-crate scenarios but that didn't handle a tuple struct rexported from an inner module for example (e.g. the NonZero* types as seen in #85049).

```Rust
➜  cat bug.rs
fn main() {
    let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
    let n = std::num::NonZeroU32::new(1).unwrap();
    match n {
        std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
    }
}
```

**Before:**
<details>

```Rust
➜  rustc +nightly bug.rs
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
   --> bug.rs:2:14
    |
2   |       let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
    |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct literal syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0: val }`
    |
   ::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: expected tuple struct or tuple variant, found struct `std::num::NonZeroU32`
   --> bug.rs:5:9
    |
5   |           std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
    |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use struct pattern syntax instead: `std::num::NonZeroU32 { 0 }`
    |
   ::: /home/luqman/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>

**After:**
<details>

```Rust
➜  /rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc bug.rs
error[E0423]: cannot initialize a tuple struct which contains private fields
   --> bug.rs:2:14
    |
2   |     let _x = std::num::NonZeroU32(12);
    |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
   --> /rust/library/core/src/num/nonzero.rs:148:1
[snip]
error[E0532]: cannot match against a tuple struct which contains private fields
 --> bug.rs:5:9
  |
5 |         std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
  |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
note: constructor is not visible here due to private fields
 --> bug.rs:5:30
  |
5 |         std::num::NonZeroU32(i) => {},
  |                              ^ private field

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0423, E0532.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.
```
</details>

One question is if we should only collect the needed info for the cross-crate case after encountering an error instead of always doing it. Perf run perhaps to gauge the impact.
2021-05-13 15:54:10 +02:00
bors
d2df620789 Auto merge of #85110 - RalfJung:no-rustc_args_required_const, r=oli-obk
Remove rustc_args_required_const attribute

Now that stdarch no longer needs it (thanks `@Amanieu!),` we can kill the `rustc_args_required_const` attribute. This means that lifetime extension of references to temporaries is the only remaining job that promotion is performing. :-)

r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69493
2021-05-13 13:37:32 +00:00
Ralf Jung
c61e8face0 fix test suite 2021-05-13 15:01:09 +02:00
Ralf Jung
2a245e0226 update stdarch 2021-05-13 15:01:09 +02:00
bors
17b60b8738 Auto merge of #83129 - LeSeulArtichaut:thir-unsafeck, r=nikomatsakis
Introduce the beginning of a THIR unsafety checker

This poses the foundations for the THIR unsafety checker, so that it can be implemented incrementally:
- implements a rudimentary `Visitor` for the THIR (which will definitely need some tweaking in the future)
- introduces a new `-Zthir-unsafeck` flag which tells the compiler to use THIR unsafeck instead of MIR unsafeck
- implements detection of unsafe functions
- adds revisions to the UI tests to test THIR unsafeck alongside MIR unsafeck

This uses a very simple query design, where bodies are unsafety-checked on a body per body basis. This however has some big flaws:
- the unsafety-checker builds the THIR itself, which means a lot of work is duplicated with MIR building constructing its own copy of the THIR
- unsafety-checking closures is currently completely wrong: closures should take into account the "safety context" in which they are created, here we are considering that closures are always a safe context

I had intended to fix these problems in follow-up PRs since they are always gated under the `-Zthir-unsafeck` flag (which is explicitely noted to be unsound).

r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/project-thir-unsafeck/issues/3 https://github.com/rust-lang/project-thir-unsafeck/issues/7
2021-05-13 10:49:29 +00:00
Niko Matsakis
89c58eac68 have on_completion record subcycles
Rework `on_completion` method so that it removes all
provisional cache entries that are "below" a completed
node (while leaving those entries that are not below
the node).

This corrects an imprecise result that could in turn lead
to an incremental compilation failure. Under the old
scheme, if you had:

* A depends on...
     * B depends on A
     * C depends on...
         * D depends on C
     * T: 'static

then the provisional results for A, B, C, and D would all
be entangled. Thus, if A was `EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions`
(because of that final condition), then the result for C and
D would also be demoted to "ok modulo regions".

In reality, though, the result for C depends only on C and itself,
and is not dependent on regions. If we happen to evaluate the
cycle starting from C, we would never reach A, and hence the
result would be "ok".

Under the new scheme, the provisional results for C and D
are moved to the permanent cache immediately and are not affected
by the result of A.
2021-05-13 05:58:21 -04:00
Niko Matsakis
c7cb72828d introduce a unit testing feature rustc_evaluate_where_clauses
This attribute will cause us to invoke evaluate on every where clause of an
invoked function and to generate an error with the result.

Without this, it is very difficult to observe the effects of invoking the trait
evaluator.
2021-05-13 04:49:20 -04:00
bors
703f2e1685 Auto merge of #85041 - mibac138:suggest-generics, r=estebank
Suggest adding a type parameter for impls

Add a new suggestion upon encountering an unknown type in a `impl` that suggests adding a new type parameter. This diagnostic suggests to add a new type parameter even though it may be a const parameter, however after adding the parameter and running rustc again a follow up error steers the user to change the type parameter to a const parameter.

```rust
struct X<const C: ()>();
impl X<C> {}
```
suggests
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `C` in this scope
 --> bar.rs:2:8
  |
1 | struct X<const C: ()>();
  | ------------------------ similarly named struct `X` defined here
2 | impl X<C> {}
  |        ^
  |
help: a struct with a similar name exists
  |
2 | impl X<X> {}
  |        ^
help: you might be missing a type parameter
  |
2 | impl<C> X<C> {}
  |     ^^^
```
After adding a type parameter the code now becomes
```rust
struct X<const C: ()>();
impl<C> X<C> {}
```
and the error now fully steers the user towards the correct code
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
 --> bar.rs:2:11
  |
2 | impl<C> X<C> {}
  |           ^
  |
help: consider changing this type parameter to be a `const` generic
  |
2 | impl<const C: ()> X<C> {}
  |      ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
r? `@estebank`
Somewhat related #84946
2021-05-13 08:08:20 +00:00
bors
72d07257ed Auto merge of #84732 - DrChat:asm_powerpc, r=Amanieu
Add asm!() support for PowerPC

This includes GPRs and FPRs only.
Note that this does not include PowerPC64.

For my reference, this was mostly duplicated from PR #73214.
2021-05-13 05:40:55 +00:00
bors
631e989738 Auto merge of #83759 - SkiFire13:fix-diag, r=estebank
Handle more span edge cases in generics diagnostics

This should fix invalid suggestions that didn't account for empty bracket pairs (`<>`) or type bindings.
2021-05-13 03:19:13 +00:00
Aaron Hill
bc6330d47a
Don't suggest adding 'static lifetime to arguments
Fixes #69350

This is almost always the wrong this to do
2021-05-12 21:43:09 -04:00
bors
9daf546b77 Auto merge of #82069 - Aaron1011:verbose-in-macro, r=estebank
Show macro name in 'this error originates in macro' message

When there are multiple macros in use, it can be difficult to tell
which one was responsible for producing an error.
2021-05-13 00:31:39 +00:00
Aaron Hill
0dd9f118d9
Show macro name in 'this error originates in macro' message
When there are multiple macros in use, it can be difficult to tell
which one was responsible for producing an error.
2021-05-12 19:03:06 -04:00
bors
31bd868c39 Auto merge of #85218 - kornelski:pointerinline, r=scottmcm
#[inline(always)] on basic pointer methods

Retryng #85201 with only inlining pointer methods. The goal is to make pointers behave just like pointers in O0, mainly to reduce overhead in debug builds.

cc `@scottmcm`
2021-05-12 21:50:27 +00:00
bors
21e92b9730 Auto merge of #85188 - RalfJung:miri, r=RalfJung
update Miri

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85179
Cc `@rust-lang/miri` r? `@ghost`
2021-05-12 18:55:22 +00:00
Ralf Jung
48517460a5 update Miri 2021-05-12 20:29:33 +02:00
Fabian Wolff
57291b8c5e Improve error message for non-exhaustive matches on non-exhaustive enums 2021-05-12 19:25:12 +02:00
bors
70e52caed9 Auto merge of #85231 - GuillaumeGomez:rollup-hufe4gz, r=GuillaumeGomez
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #84793 (Recover from invalid `struct` item syntax)
 - #85117 (Move global click handlers to per-element ones.)
 - #85141 (Update documentation for SharedContext::maybe_collapsed_doc_value)
 - #85174 (Fix border radius for doc code blocks in rustdoc)
 - #85205 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-05-12 16:14:30 +00:00
Guillaume Gomez
7684247e14
Rollup merge of #85205 - ehuss:update-books, r=ehuss
Update books

## nomicon

4 commits in 8551afbb2ca6f5ea37fe58380318b209785e4e02..55de6fa3c1f331774da19472c9ee57d2ae9eb039
2021-04-01 21:58:50 +0900 to 2021-05-12 00:31:01 +0900
- Clarify some of the language around marking traits safe/unsafe. (rust-lang-nursery/nomicon#268)
- Use pointer 'add' instead of 'offset' (rust-lang-nursery/nomicon#265)
- Adjust Vec to build on stable Rust (rust-lang-nursery/nomicon#223)
- Update link to c++ atomic ordering docs (rust-lang-nursery/nomicon#264)

## reference

3 commits in d23f9da8469617e6c81121d9fd123443df70595d..5aa457bf1b54bd2cd5d4cf49797f29299bdf89a7
2021-04-28 11:16:44 -0700 to 2021-05-05 08:39:22 -0700
- Explicitly state result of compound assignment (rust-lang-nursery/reference#1013)
- Adjust the definition of `target_family` (rust-lang-nursery/reference#1006)
- Fix typo in `Traits` (rust-lang-nursery/reference#1012)

## book

2 commits in 50dd06cb71beb27fdc0eebade5509cdcc1f821ed..55a26488ddefc8433e73a2e8352d70f7a5c7fc2b
2021-04-23 13:21:54 -0500 to 2021-05-09 12:03:18 -0500
- Past-tensify "lead" -&gt; "led" (rust-lang/book#2717)
- Merge pull request rust-lang/book#2718 from rust-lang/update-rustc

## rust-by-example

2 commits in e0a721f5202e6d9bec0aff99f10e44480c0da9e7..5f8c6da200ada77760a2fe1096938ef58151c9a6
2021-04-27 09:32:15 -0300 to 2021-04-29 08:08:01 -0300
- Fix Typo in LRBE section; closes rust-lang/rust-by-example#1434 (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1437)
- Add some tests to cargo/test.md. Partially addresses rust-lang/rust-by-example#1304 (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1438)

## rustc-dev-guide

3 commits in e72b43a64925ce053dc7830e21c1a57ba00499bd..1e6c7fbda4c45e85adf63ff3f82fa9c870b1447f
2021-04-27 12:35:37 -0700 to 2021-05-10 13:38:24 +0900
- Unified CPU Requirements (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1126)
- add 'waiting-for-review' incantation to main contrib page (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1124)
- Link to Zulip search for finding the most recent check-in (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1118)
2021-05-12 17:19:30 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
bc26def1d5
Rollup merge of #85174 - GuillaumeGomez:doc-code-block-border-radius, r=jsha
Fix border radius for doc code blocks in rustdoc

In #85148, I made an invalid change on the border radius of the doc code blocks (look in the top left and bottom left corners of the code blocks).

Before this fix:

![Screenshot from 2021-05-11 11-14-59](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/117791459-a4f86b80-b24a-11eb-8ac3-facc719c799a.png)

After this fix:

![Screenshot from 2021-05-11 11-05-29](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/117791482-a9bd1f80-b24a-11eb-8c38-a01989595f5c.png)

r? `@jsha`
2021-05-12 17:19:29 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
249ed26b13
Rollup merge of #85141 - GuillaumeGomez:maybe_collapsed_doc_value-doc, r=jsha
Update documentation for SharedContext::maybe_collapsed_doc_value

Fixes #85120.

The `doc-collapse` was removed, however, the main crate is always "collapsed", meaning that this function is still needed. I updated the documentation instead to avoid misleading readers.

r? `@jsha`
2021-05-12 17:19:28 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
90f6fe852b
Rollup merge of #85117 - jsha:bubble-bubble-toil-and-trouble, r=GuillaumeGomez
Move global click handlers to per-element ones.

In rustdoc's main.js, we had an onclick handler for the whole document that would dispatch to handlers for various elements. This change attaches the handlers to the elements that trigger them, instead. This simplifies the code and avoids reimplementing the browser's bubbling functionality.

As part of this change, change from a class to an id for help button.

Move the handlers and associated code for highlighting source lines into source-script.js (and factor out a shared regex).

Demo at https://hoffman-andrews.com/rust/bubble-bubble-toil-and-trouble/std/string/struct.String.html

Note: this conflicts with / depends on #85074. Once that's merged I'll rebase this and resolve conflicts.

Part of #83332. Thanks to `@Manishearth` for the [suggestion to not reimplement bubbling](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83332#issuecomment-803497509).

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
2021-05-12 17:19:27 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
94617802a1
Rollup merge of #84793 - estebank:parse-struct-field-default, r=davidtwco
Recover from invalid `struct` item syntax

Parse unsupported "default field const values":

```rust
struct S {
    field: Type = const_val,
}
```

Recover from small `:` typo and provide suggestion:

```rust
struct S {
    field; Type,
    field2= Type,
}
```
2021-05-12 17:19:25 +02:00
Ralf Jung
2e8e91ce25 add check that simd_shuffle arguments are constants 2021-05-12 16:15:30 +02:00
Ralf Jung
44a8e8d745 entirely remove rustc_args_required_const attribute 2021-05-12 16:15:27 +02:00
Ralf Jung
22e1778ec0 rustc_args_required_const is no longer a promotion site 2021-05-12 16:14:57 +02:00
bors
28e2b29b89 Auto merge of #84730 - sexxi-goose:rox-auto-trait, r=nikomatsakis
Add auto traits and clone trait migrations for RFC2229

This PR
- renames the existent RFC2229 migration `disjoint_capture_drop_reorder` to `disjoint_capture_migration`
- add additional migrations for auto traits and clone trait

Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#29
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229#28

r? `@nikomatsakis`
2021-05-12 13:33:32 +00:00
Giacomo Stevanato
7f5ad614ae Bless tests 2021-05-12 13:57:30 +02:00
Giacomo Stevanato
566012ebf2 Update wrong-number-of-args test to cover more edge cases 2021-05-12 13:57:30 +02:00
Giacomo Stevanato
2cedccbdc8 Fix diagnostics spans for missing lifetimes in edge cases 2021-05-12 13:54:38 +02:00
Giacomo Stevanato
338dc1f18c Fix diagnostics spans for missing generics in edge cases 2021-05-12 13:36:21 +02:00
bors
e1ff91f439 Auto merge of #83813 - cbeuw:remap-std, r=michaelwoerister
Fix `--remap-path-prefix` not correctly remapping `rust-src` component paths and unify handling of path mapping with virtualized paths

This PR fixes #73167 ("Binaries end up containing path to the rust-src component despite `--remap-path-prefix`") by preventing real local filesystem paths from reaching compilation output if the path is supposed to be remapped.

`RealFileName::Named` introduced in #72767 is now renamed as `LocalPath`, because this variant wraps a (most likely) valid local filesystem path.

`RealFileName::Devirtualized` is renamed as `Remapped` to be used for remapped path from a real path via `--remap-path-prefix` argument, as well as real path inferred from a virtualized (during compiler bootstrapping) `/rustc/...` path. The `local_path` field is now an `Option<PathBuf>`, as it will be set to `None` before serialisation, so it never reaches any build output. Attempting to serialise a non-`None` `local_path` will cause an assertion faliure.

When a path is remapped, a `RealFileName::Remapped` variant is created. The original path is preserved in `local_path` field and the remapped path is saved in `virtual_name` field. Previously, the `local_path` is directly modified which goes against its purpose of "suitable for reading from the file system on the local host".

`rustc_span::SourceFile`'s fields `unmapped_path` (introduced by #44940) and `name_was_remapped` (introduced by #41508 when `--remap-path-prefix` feature originally added) are removed, as these two pieces of information can be inferred from the `name` field: if it's anything other than a `FileName::Real(_)`, or if it is a `FileName::Real(RealFileName::LocalPath(_))`, then clearly `name_was_remapped` would've been false and `unmapped_path` would've been `None`. If it is a `FileName::Real(RealFileName::Remapped{local_path, virtual_name})`, then `name_was_remapped` would've been true and `unmapped_path` would've been `Some(local_path)`.

cc `@eddyb` who implemented `/rustc/...` path devirtualisation
2021-05-12 11:05:56 +00:00
Giacomo Stevanato
b1c8835a0f Add more precise span informations to generic types 2021-05-12 11:36:07 +02:00