Performance before:
std::treemap::TreeMap
sequential_ints 0.083971 s
random_ints 0.095861 s
delete_ints 0.083931 s
sequential_strings 0.278272 s
random_strings 0.240286 s
delete_strings 0.173581 s
Performance after:
std::treemap::TreeMap
sequential_ints 0.083297 s
random_ints 0.097644 s
delete_ints 0.052602 s
sequential_strings 0.287326 s
random_strings 0.242372 s
delete_strings 0.142269 s
Performance before:
std::treemap::TreeMap
sequential_ints 0.151877 s
random_ints 0.160926 s
delete_ints 0.08694 s
sequential_strings 0.316458 s
random_strings 0.290778 s
delete_strings 0.169892 s
Performance after:
std::treemap::TreeMap
sequential_ints 0.083971 s
random_ints 0.095861 s
delete_ints 0.083931 s
sequential_strings 0.278272 s
random_strings 0.240286 s
delete_strings 0.173581 s
- thanks to work in libuv's upstream, we can call libuv's Makefile directly
with parameters, instead of descending in gyp-uv madness and generating
our own.
Without this change, rust-mode doesn't work if 'cl hasn't been required
by something else, apparently. I'm not entirely sure what changed such
that I started seeing this problem instead of not, but maybe the emacs
world has been making progress towards not loading 'cl at runtime if
it's only needed at compile time.
If an enum is isomorphic to unit, there's no need to use any bits to
represent it. The only obvious reason this wasn't the case was because
the enum could be C-like and have a user-specified discriminant -- but
that value is constant, so it doesn't need to be stored.
This change means that all newtype-like enums have the same size (and
layout) as their underlying type, which might be a useful property to
have, at least in terms of making programs' low-level behavior less
surprising.
If an enum is isomorphic to unit, there's no need to use any bits to
represent it. The only obvious reason this wasn't the case was because
the enum could be C-like and have a user-specified discriminant -- but
that value is constant, so it doesn't need to be stored.
This change means that all newtype-like enums have the same size (and
layout) as their underlying type, which might be a useful property to
have, at least in terms of making programs' low-level behavior less
surprising.
