check array type of repeat exprs is wf
Fixes#111091
Also makes sure that we actually renumber regions in the length of repeat exprs which we previously weren't doing and would cause ICEs in `adt_const_params` + `generic_const_exprs` from attempting to prove the wf goals when the length was an unevaluated constant with `'erased` in the `ty` field of `Const`
The duplicate errors are caused by the fact that `const_arg_to_const`/`array_len_to_const` in `FnCtxt` adds a `WellFormed` goal for the created `Const` which is also checked by the added `WellFormed(array_ty)`. I don't want to change this to just emit a `T: Sized` goal for the element type since that would ignore `ConstArgHasType` wf requirements and generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying to sync up `wf::obligations` for arrays and the code in hir typeck for repeat exprs.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes#110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
My type ascription
Oh rip it out
Ah
If you think we live too much then
You can sacrifice diagnostics
Don't mix your garbage
Into my syntax
So many weird hacks keep diagnostics alive
Yet I don't even step outside
So many bad diagnostics keep tyasc alive
Yet tyasc doesn't even bother to survive!
Add suggestion to use closure argument instead of a capture on borrowck error
Fixes#109271
r? `@compiler-errors`
This should probably be refined a bit, but opening a PR so that I don't forget anything.
Check pattern refutability on THIR
The current `check_match` query is based on HIR, but partially re-lowers HIR into THIR.
This PR proposed to use the results of the `thir_body` query to check matches, instead of re-building THIR.
Most of the diagnostic changes are spans getting shorter, or commas/semicolons not getting removed.
This PR degrades the diagnostic for confusing constants in patterns (`let A = foo()` where `A` resolves to a `const A` somewhere): it does not point ot the definition of `const A` any more.
Use span of placeholders in format_args!() expansion.
`format_args!("{}", x)` expands to something that contains `Argument::new_display(&x)`. That entire expression was generated with the span of `x`.
After this PR, `&x` uses the span of `x`, but the `new_display` call uses the span of the `{}` placeholder within the format string. If an implicitly captured argument was used like in `format_args!("{x}")`, both use the span of the `{x}` placeholder.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109576, and also allows for more improvements to similar diagnostics in the future, since the usage of `x` can now be traced to the exact `{}` placeholder that required it to be `Display` (or `Debug` etc.)
Move const trait bounds checks to MIR constck
Fixes#109543. When checking paths in HIR typeck, we don't want to check for const predicates since all we want might just be a function pointer. Therefore we move this to MIR constck and check that bounds are met during MIR constck.
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes#109543. When checking paths in HIR typeck, we don't want to check
for const predicates since all we want might just be a function pointer.
Therefore we move this to MIR constck and check that bounds are met
during MIR constck.
Updates `interpret`, `codegen_ssa`, and `codegen_cranelift` to consume the new cast instead of the intrinsic.
Includes `CastTransmute` for custom MIR building, to be able to test the extra UB.
Implement checked Shl/Shr at MIR building.
This does not require any special handling by codegen backends,
as the overflow behaviour is entirely determined by the rhs (shift amount).
This allows MIR ConstProp to remove the overflow check for constant shifts.
~There is an existing different behaviour between cg_llvm and cg_clif (cc `@bjorn3).`
I took cg_llvm's one as reference: overflow if `rhs < 0 || rhs > number_of_bits_in_lhs_ty`.~
EDIT: `cg_llvm` and `cg_clif` implement the overflow check differently. This PR uses `cg_llvm`'s implementation based on a `BitAnd` instead of `cg_clif`'s one based on an unsigned comparison.
Ensure `ptr::read` gets all the same LLVM `load` metadata that dereferencing does
I was looking into `array::IntoIter` optimization, and noticed that it wasn't annotating the loads with `noundef` for simple things like `array::IntoIter<i32, N>`. Trying to narrow it down, it seems that was because `MaybeUninit::assume_init_read` isn't marking the load as initialized (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Mxd8TPTnv>), which is unfortunate since that's basically its reason to exist.
The root cause is that `ptr::read` is currently implemented via the *untyped* `copy_nonoverlapping`, and thus the `load` doesn't get any type-aware metadata: no `noundef`, no `!range`. This PR solves that by lowering `ptr::read(p)` to `copy *p` in MIR, for which the backends already do the right thing.
Fortuitiously, this also improves the IR we give to LLVM for things like `mem::replace`, and fixes a couple of long-standing bugs where `ptr::read` on `Copy` types was worse than `*`ing them.
Zulip conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Move.20array.3A.3AIntoIter.20to.20ManuallyDrop/near/341189936>
cc `@erikdesjardins` `@JakobDegen` `@workingjubilee` `@the8472`
Fixes#106369Fixes#73258
Remove `box_syntax`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
This removes the feature `box_syntax`, which allows the use of `box <expr>` to create a Box, and finalises removing use of the feature from the compiler. `box_patterns` (allowing the use of `box <pat>` in a pattern) is unaffected.
It also removes `ast::ExprKind::Box` - the only way to create a 'box' expression now is with the rustc-internal `#[rustc_box]` attribute.
As a temporary measure to help users move away, `box <expr>` now parses the inner expression, and emits a `MachineApplicable` lint to replace it with `Box::new`
Closes#49733
Strengthen state tracking in const-prop
Some/many of the changes are replicated between both the const-prop lint and the const-prop optimization.
Behaviour changes:
- const-prop opt does not give a span to propagated values. This was useless as that span's primary purpose is to diagnose evaluation failure in codegen.
- we remove the `OnlyPropagateInto` mode. It was only used for function arguments, which are better modeled by a write before entry.
- the tracking of assignments and discriminants make clearer that we do nothing in `NoPropagation` mode or on indirect places.
I was looking into `array::IntoIter` optimization, and noticed that it wasn't annotating the loads with `noundef` for simple things like `array::IntoIter<i32, N>`.
Turned out to be a more general problem as `MaybeUninit::assume_init_read` isn't marking the load as initialized (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Mxd8TPTnv>), which is unfortunate since that's basically its reason to exist.
This PR lowers `ptr::read(p)` to `copy *p` in MIR, which fortuitiously also improves the IR we give to LLVM for things like `mem::replace`.
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
implement const iterator using `rustc_do_not_const_check`
Previous experiment: #102225.
Explanation: rather than making all default methods work under `const` all at once, this uses `rustc_do_not_const_check` as a workaround to "trick" the compiler to not run any checks on those other default methods. Any const implementations are only required to implement the `next` method. Any actual calls to the trait methods other than `next` will either error in compile time (at CTFE runs), or run the methods correctly if they do not have any non-const operations. This is extremely easy to maintain, remove, or improve.
Use DefKind to give more item kind information during BindingObligation note
The current label says "required by a bound in this". When I see that label, my immediate impression is "this... **what**?". It feels like it was cut short.
Alternative to this would be saying "in this item", but adding the item kind is strictly more informational and adds very little overhead to the existing error presentation.
lint: don't suggest MaybeUninit::assume_init for uninhabited types
Creating a zeroed uninhabited type such as `!` or an empty enum with `mem::zeroed()` (or transmuting `()` to `!`) currently triggers this lint:
```rs
warning: the type `!` does not permit zero-initialization
--> test.rs:5:23
|
5 | let _val: ! = mem::zeroed();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| this code causes undefined behavior when executed
| help: use `MaybeUninit<T>` instead, and only call `assume_init` after initialization is done
|
= note: the `!` type has no valid value
```
The `MaybeUninit` suggestion in the help message seems confusing/useless for uninhabited types, as such a type cannot be fully initialized in the first place (as the note implies).
This PR limits this help message to inhabited types which can be initialized
