Using a type alias for iterator implementations is fragile since this
exposes the implementation to users of the iterator, and any changes
could break existing code.
This commit changes the iterators of `HashSet` to use
proper new types, rather than type aliases. However, since it is
fair-game to treat a type-alias as the aliased type, this is a:
[breaking-change].
Using a type alias for iterator implementations is fragile since this
exposes the implementation to users of the iterator, and any changes
could break existing code.
This commit changes the keys and values iterators of `HashMap` to use
proper new types, rather than type aliases. However, since it is
fair-game to treat a type-alias as the aliased type, this is a:
[breaking-change].
Using a type alias for iterator implementations is fragile since this
exposes the implementation to users of the iterator, and any changes
could break existing code.
This commit changes the iterators of `BTreeSet` to use
proper new types, rather than type aliases. However, since it is
fair-game to treat a type-alias as the aliased type, this is a:
[breaking-change].
Using a type alias for iterator implementations is fragile since this
exposes the implementation to users of the iterator, and any changes
could break existing code.
This commit changes the keys and values iterators of `BTreeMap` to use
proper new types, rather than type aliases. However, since it is
fair-game to treat a type-alias as the aliased type, this is a:
[breaking-change].
- The following operator traits now take their arguments by value: `Add`, `Sub`, `Mul`, `Div`, `Rem`, `BitAnd`, `BitOr`, `BitXor`, `Shl`, `Shr`. This breaks all existing implementations of these traits.
- The binary operation `a OP b` now "desugars" to `OpTrait::op_method(a, b)` and consumes both arguments.
- `String` and `Vec` addition have been changed to reuse the LHS owned value, and to avoid internal cloning. Only the following asymmetric operations are available: `String + &str` and `Vec<T> + &[T]`, which are now a short-hand for the "append" operation.
[breaking-change]
---
This passes `make check` locally. I haven't touch the unary operators in this PR, but converting them to by value should be very similar to this PR. I can work on them after this gets the thumbs up.
@nikomatsakis r? the compiler changes
@aturon r? the library changes. I think the only controversial bit is the semantic change of the `Vec`/`String` `Add` implementation.
cc #19148
visualization of region inference constraint graph.
Optionally uses environment variables `RUST_REGION_GRAPH=<path_template>`
and `RUST_REGION_GRAPH_NODE=<node-id>` to select which file to output
to and which AST node to print.
Note that in some cases of method AST's, the identification of AST
node is based on the id for the *body* of the method; this is largely
due to having the body node-id already available at the relevant point
in the control-flow of rustc in its current incarnation. Ideally we
would handle identifying AST's by name in addition to node-id,
e.g. the same way that the pretty-printer supports path suffixes as
well as node-ids for identifying subtrees to print.
Relax some of the bounds on the decoder methods back to FnMut to help accomodate
some more flavorful variants of decoders which may need to run the closure more
than once when it, for example, attempts to find the first successful enum to
decode.
This a breaking change due to the bounds for the trait switching, and clients
will need to update from `FnOnce` to `FnMut` as well as likely making the local
function binding mutable in order to call the function.
[breaking-change]
This is not technically a [breaking-change], but it will be soon, so
you should update your code. Typically, shadowing is accidental, and
the shadowing lifetime can simply be removed. This frequently occurs
in constructor patterns:
```rust
// Old:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> { fn new<'a>(..) -> SomeStruct<'a> { ... } }
// Should be:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> { fn new(..) -> SomeStruct<'a> { ... } }
```
Otherwise, you should rename the inner lifetime to something
else. Note though that lifetime elision frequently applies:
```rust
// Old
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> {
fn get<'a>(x: &'a self) -> &'a T { &self.field }
}
// Should be:
impl<'a> SomeStruct<'a> {
fn get(x: &self) -> &T { &self.field }
}
``
In preparation for [removing the `std::cmp::Ordering` reexport](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19253), this needs to be done to prevent errors like:
```
note: in expansion of #[deriving]
note: expansion site
error: unresolved name `std::cmp::Equal`
#[deriving(Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Show)]
^~~
```
On AArch64, libc::c_char is u8. There are some places in the code where i8 is assumed, which causes compilation errors.
(AArch64 is not officially supported yet, but this change does not hurt any other targets and makes the code future-proof.)
Build `clean::ConstantItem` values in the `inline` module and
pretty-print the AST for inlined const items.
Doc strings are still missing from inlined constants (see #19773).
Partially address #18156, #19722, #19185Fix#15821
r? @alexcrichton
This is a revival of #19517 (per request of @alexcrichton) now that the new snapshots have landed. We can now remove the last feature gates for if_let, while_let, and tuple_indexing scattered throughout the test sources since these features have been added to Rust.
Closes#19473.
In US english, "that" is used in restrictive clauses in place of
"which", and often affects the meaning of sentences.
In UK english and many dialects, no distinction is
made.
While Rust devs want to avoid unproductive pedanticism, it is worth at
least being uniform in documentation such as:
http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html
and also in cases where correct usage of US english clarifies the
sentence.
Makes a couple changes that support the implementation of a REPL:
* Implementation of wrapper code for LLVM ExecutionEngine API
* Fixing a change I made earlier to reset compiler state in `phase_1_[...]`
instead of `compile_input` as the latter is not used in a REPL
This commit collapses the various prelude traits for slices into just one trait:
* SlicePrelude/SliceAllocPrelude => SliceExt
* CloneSlicePrelude/CloneSliceAllocPrelude => CloneSliceExt
* OrdSlicePrelude/OrdSliceAllocPrelude => OrdSliceExt
* PartialEqSlicePrelude => PartialEqSliceExt
This test would read with a timeout and then send a UDP message, expecting the
message to be received. The receiving port, however, was bound in the child
thread so it could be the case that the timeout and send happens before the
child thread runs. To remedy this we just bind the port before the child thread
runs, moving it into the child later on.
cc #19120
This commit takes a second pass through the `std::option` module to fully
stabilize any lingering methods inside of it.
These items were made stable as-is
* Some
* None
* as_mut
* expect
* unwrap
* unwrap_or
* unwrap_or_else
* map
* map_or
* map_or_else
* and_then
* or_else
* unwrap_or_default
* Default implementation
* FromIterator implementation
* Copy implementation
These items were made stable with modifications
* iter - now returns a struct called Iter
* iter_mut - now returns a struct called IterMut
* into_iter - now returns a struct called IntoIter, Clone is never implemented
This is a breaking change due to the modifications to the names of the iterator
types returned. Code referencing the old names should updated to referencing the
newer names instead. This is also a breaking change due to the fact that
`IntoIter` no longer implements the `Clone` trait.
These items were explicitly not stabilized
* as_slice - waiting on indexing conventions
* as_mut_slice - waiting on conventions with as_slice as well
* cloned - the API was still just recently added
* ok_or - API remains experimental
* ok_or_else - API remains experimental
[breaking-change]
This PR allows declaring traits and impls as `unsafe`. An `unsafe` trait requires an `unsafe` impl. An `unsafe` impl does not permit unsafe code within its interior (unless that code is contained within an unsafe block or unsafe fn, as normal). The commits are standalone.
r? @alexcrichton
cc #13231
Closes#14602. As discussed in that issue, the existing `at` and `name`
functions represent two different results with the empty string:
1. Matched the empty string.
2. Did not match anything.
Consider the following example. This regex has two named matched
groups, `key` and `value`. `value` is optional:
```rust
// Matches "foo", "foo;v=bar" and "foo;v=".
regex!(r"(?P<key>[a-z]+)(;v=(?P<value>[a-z]*))?");
```
We can access `value` using `caps.name("value")`, but there's no way for
us to distinguish between the `"foo"` and `"foo;v="` cases.
Early this year, @BurntSushi recommended modifying the existing `at` and
`name` functions to return `Option`, instead of adding new functions to
the API.
This is a [breaking-change], but the fix is easy:
- `refs.at(1)` becomes `refs.at(1).unwrap_or("")`.
- `refs.name(name)` becomes `refs.name(name).unwrap_or("")`.
They are replaced with unboxed closures.
cc @pcwalton @aturon
This is a [breaking-change]. Mostly, uses of `proc()` simply need to be converted to `move||` (unboxed closures), but in some cases the adaptations required are more complex (particularly for library authors). A detailed write-up can be found here: http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/11/26/purging-proc/
The commits are ordered to emphasize the more important changes, but are not truly standalone.
Unlike a tuple variant constructor which can be called as a function, a struct variant constructor is not a function, so cannot be called.
If the user tries to assign the constructor to a variable, an ICE occurs, because there is no way to use it later. So we should stop the constructor from being used like that.
A similar mechanism already exists for a normal struct, as it prohibits a struct from being resolved. This commit does the same for a struct variant.
This commit also includes some changes to the existing tests.
Fixes#19452.
The primary focus of Rust's stability story at 1.0 is the standard library.
All other libraries distributed with the Rust compiler are planned to
be #[unstable] and therfore only accessible on the nightly channel of Rust. One
of the more widely used libraries today is libserialize, Rust's current solution
for encoding and decoding types.
The current libserialize library, however, has a number of drawbacks:
* The API is not ready to be stabilize as-is and we will likely not have enough
resources to stabilize the API for 1.0.
* The library is not necessarily the speediest implementations with alternatives
being developed out-of-tree (e.g. serde from erickt).
* It is not clear how the API of Encodable/Decodable can evolve over time while
maintaining backwards compatibility.
One of the major pros to the current libserialize, however, is
`deriving(Encodable, Decodable)` as short-hands for enabling serializing and
deserializing a type. This is unambiguously useful functionality, so we cannot
simply deprecate the in-tree libserialize in favor of an external crates.io
implementation.
For these reasons, this commit starts off a stability story for libserialize by
following these steps:
1. The deriving(Encodable, Decodable) modes will be deprecated in favor of a
renamed deriving(RustcEncodable, RustcDecodable).
2. The in-tree libserialize will be deprecated in favor of an external
rustc-serialize crate shipped on crates.io. The contents of the crate will be
the same for now (but they can evolve separately).
3. At 1.0 serialization will be performed through
deriving(RustcEncodable, RustcDecodable) and the rustc-serialize crate. The
expansions for each deriving mode will change from `::serialize::foo` to
`::rustc_serialize::foo`.
This story will require that the compiler freezes its implementation of
`RustcEncodable` deriving for all of time, but this should be a fairly minimal
maintenance burden. Otherwise the crate in crates.io must always maintain the
exact definition of its traits, but the implementation of json, for example, can
continue to evolve in the semver-sense.
The major goal for this stabilization effort is to pave the road for a new
official serialization crate which can replace the current one, solving many of
its downsides in the process. We are not assuming that this will exist for 1.0,
hence the above measures. Some possibilities for replacing libserialize include:
* If plugins have a stable API, then any crate can provide a custom `deriving`
mode (will require some compiler work). This means that any new serialization
crate can provide its own `deriving` with its own backing
implementation, entirely obsoleting the current libserialize and fully
replacing it.
* Erick is exploring the possibility of code generation via preprocessing Rust
source files in the near term until plugins are stable. This strategy would
provide the same ergonomic benefit that `deriving` does today in theory.
So, in summary, the current libserialize crate is being deprecated in favor of
the crates.io-based rustc-serialize crate where the `deriving` modes are
appropriately renamed. This opens up space for a later implementation of
serialization in a more official capacity while allowing alternative
implementations to be explored in the meantime.
Concretely speaking, this change adds support for the `RustcEncodable` and
`RustcDecodable` deriving modes. After a snapshot is made warnings will be
turned on for usage of `Encodable` and `Decodable` as well as deprecating the
in-tree libserialize crate to encurage users to use rustc-serialize instead.
Using a type alias for iterator implementations is fragile since this
exposes the implementation to users of the iterator, and any changes
could break existing code.
This commit changes the iterators of `VecMap` to use
proper new types, rather than type aliases. However, since it is
fair-game to treat a type-alias as the aliased type, this is a:
[breaking-change].
This commit deprecates a few more in-tree libs for their crates.io counterparts.
Note that this commit does not make use of the #[deprecated] tag to prevent
warnings from being generated for in-tree usage. Once #[unstable] warnings are
turned on then all external users will be warned to move.
These crates have all been duplicated in rust-lang/$crate repositories so
development can happen independently of the in-tree copies. We can explore at a
later date replacing the in-tree copies with the external copies, but at this
time the libraries have changed very little over the past few months so it's
unlikely for changes to be sent to both repos.
cc #19260
