Enforce unwind invariants
I had a quick look at #72959. The failure message probably needs to be more detailed but I just wanted to check I got the right idea. I have no idea how to right a test for this either...
r? @jonas-schievink
Resolves#72959 (hypothetically)
Resolve E0584 conflict
Adds a new error code (`E0761`) to indicate ambiguity in module file names and an accompanying expanded description to resolve a conflict over `E0584`.
Resolves#73116
Add Item::is_fake for rustdoc
I wasn't aware items _could_ be fake, so I think having a function
mentioning it could be helpful. Also, I'd need to make this change for
cross-crate intra-doc links anyway, so I figured it's better to make the
refactor separate.
This commit ensures that if a `repr(transparent)` newtype's only
non-zero-sized field is FFI-safe then the newtype is also FFI-safe.
Previously, ZSTs were ignored for the purposes of linting FFI-safety
in transparent structs - thus, only the single non-ZST would be checked
for FFI-safety. However, if the non-zero-sized field is a generic
parameter, and is substituted for a ZST, then the type would be
considered FFI-unsafe (as when every field is thought to be zero-sized,
the type is considered to be "composed only of `PhantomData`" which is
FFI-unsafe).
In this commit, for transparent structs, the non-zero-sized field is
identified (before any substitutions are applied, necessarily) and then
that field's type (now with substitutions) is checked for FFI-safety
(where previously it would have been skipped for being zero-sized in
this case).
To handle the case where the non-zero-sized field is a generic
parameter, which is substituted for `()` (a ZST), and is being used
as a return type - the `FfiUnsafe` result (previously `FfiPhantom`) is
caught and silenced.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit moves the check that skips unit return types to after
where the return type has been normalized - therefore ensuring that
FFI-safety lints are not emitted for types which normalize to unit.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Replace old GDB and LLDB pretty-printers with new ones
which were originally written for IntelliJ Rust.
New LLDB pretty-printers support synthetic children.
New GDB/LLDB pretty-printers support all Rust types
supported by old pretty-printers, and also support:
Rc, Arc, Cell, Ref, RefCell, RefMut, HashMap, HashSet.
This commit adds a test of the improper ctypes lint, checking that
return type are normalized bethat return types are normalized before
being checked for FFI-safety, and that transparent newtype wrappers
are FFI-safe if the type being wrapped is FFI-safe.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This patch brings the AVR calling convention argument classification
logic in line with AVR Clang's behaviour.
AVR-Clang currently uses the `clang::DefaultABIInfo` ABI implementation.
This calling convention promotes all aggregates to indirect, no matter their
size.
It is also unnecessary to perform any integer width extension for AVR as
the minimum argument size matches the minimum describable size of
abi::Primitive::Int - 8 bits.
At some point in the future, an AVR-GCC compatible argument
classification implementation should be adopted in both Clang and Rust.
This commit fixes debug printing of function pointers on AVR. AVR does
not support `addrspacecast` instructions, and so this patch modifies
libcore so that a `ptrtoint` IR instruction is used and the address
space cast is avoided.
Revert #71956
...since it caused unsoundness in #73137. Also adds a reduced version of #73137 to the test suite. The addition of the `MaybeInitializedLocals` dataflow analysis has not been reverted, but it is no longer used.
Presumably there is a more targeted fix, but I'm worried that other bugs may be lurking. I'm not yet sure what the root cause of #73137 is.
This will need to get backported to beta.
r? @tmandry
This is only really useful in debug messages, so I've switched to
calling `span_to_string` in any place that causes a `Span` to end up in
user-visible output.
Previously, we would parse `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;`
identically, leading to an 'empty' `where` clause being omitted during
pretty printing. This will cause us to lose spans when proc-macros
involved, since we will have a collected `where` token that does not
appear in the pretty-printed item.
We now explicitly track the presence of a `where` token during parsing,
so that we can distinguish between `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;`
during pretty-printing
