Implement Vec::splice and String::splice (RFC 1432)
RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#1432, tracking issue: #32310
A rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32355 with a few more tests.
Let me know if you have any ideas for more tests.
cc @SimonSapin
With regards to the unstable book, the reference, and the
processes involved.
Also, fix up a link by pointing to the new tracking issue rather than
the older one.
Fixes#41285
ASan and TSan are supported on macOS, and this commit enables their
support.
The sanitizers are always built as *.dylib on Apple platforms, so they
cannot be statically linked into the corresponding `rustc_?san.rlib`. The
dylibs are directly copied to `lib/rustlib/x86_64-apple-darwin/lib/`
instead.
Note, although Xcode also ships with their own copies of ASan/TSan dylibs,
we cannot use them due to version mismatch.
There is a caveat: the sanitizer libraries are linked as @rpath, so the
user needs to additionally pass `-C rpath`:
rustc -Z sanitizer=address -C rpath file.rs
^~~~~~~~
Otherwise there will be a runtime error:
dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib
Referenced from: /path/to/executable
Reason: image not found
Abort trap: 6
The next commit includes a temporary change in compiler to force the linker
to emit a usable @rpath.
LLVM 4.0 Upgrade
Since nobody has done this yet, I decided to get things started:
**Todo:**
* [x] push the relevant commits to `rust-lang/llvm` and `rust-lang/compiler-rt`
* [x] cleanup `.gitmodules`
* [x] Verify if there are any other commits from `rust-lang/llvm` which need backporting
* [x] Investigate / fix debuginfo ("`<optimized out>`") failures
* [x] Use correct emscripten version in docker image
---
Closes#37609.
---
**Test results:**
Everything is green 🎉
Previously the `cargotest` suite would run some arbitrary revision of Cargo's
test suite, but now that we're bundling it in tree we should be running the
Cargo submodule's test suite instead.
this commit implements the first step of the `default impl` feature:
all items in a `default impl` are (implicitly) `default` and hence
specializable.
In order to test this feature I've copied all the tests provided for the
`default` method implementation (in run-pass/specialization and
compile-fail/specialization directories) and moved the `default` keyword
from the item to the impl.
See referenced issue for further info
