add Vec::push_within_capacity - fallible, does not allocate
This method can serve several purposes. It
* is fallible
* guarantees that items in Vec aren't moved
* allows loops that do `reserve` and `push` separately to avoid pulling in the allocation machinery a second time in the `push` part which should make things easier on the optimizer
* eases the path towards `ArrayVec` a bit since - compared to `push()` - there are fewer questions around how it should be implemented
I haven't named it `try_push` because that should probably occupy a middle ground that will still try to reserve and only return an error in the unlikely OOM case.
resolves#84649
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101118 (fs::get_mode enable getting the data via fcntl/F_GETFL on major BSD)
- #102072 (Add `ptr::Alignment` type)
- #102799 (rustdoc: remove hover gap in file picker)
- #102820 (Show let-else suggestion on stable.)
- #102829 (rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`)
- #102831 (Don't use unnormalized type in `Ty::fn_sig` call in rustdoc `clean_middle_ty`)
- #102834 (Remove unnecessary `lift`/`lift_to_tcx` calls from rustdoc)
- #102838 (remove cfg(bootstrap) from Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
the kernel currently enforce that a stack is immutable. calling mmap(2) or
mprotect(2) to change it will result in EPERM, which generate a panic!().
so just do like for Linux, and trust the kernel to do the right thing.
rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`
The naming of this variant seems inconsistent given that this is not really a "type alias", and the associated type variant for `TraitItemKind` is just called `Type`.
Show let-else suggestion on stable.
The E0005 error message has a suggestion to use let-else. Now that let-else is stabilized, I think this message should be included on non-nightly toolchains. I suspect this was just an oversight from #93628. [`E0005.stderr`](be1c7aad72/src/test/ui/error-codes/E0005.stderr (L22-L25)) contains an example of what this suggestion looks like.
Reduce CString allocations in std as much as possible
Currently, every operation involving paths in `fs` allocates memory to hold the path before sending it through the syscall. This PR instead uses a stack allocation (chosen size is somewhat arbitrary) when the path is short before falling back to heap allocations for long paths.
Benchmarks show that the stack allocation is ~2x faster for short paths:
```
test sys::unix::fd::tests::bench_heap_path_alloc ... bench: 34 ns/iter (+/- 2)
test sys::unix::fd::tests::bench_stack_path_alloc ... bench: 15 ns/iter (+/- 1)
```
For long paths, I couldn't find any measurable difference.
---
I'd be surprised if I was the first to think of this, so I didn't fully flush out the PR. If this change is desirable, I'll make use of `run_with_cstr` across all platforms in every fs method (currently just unix open for testing). I also added an `impl From<FromBytesWithNulError>` which is presumably a no-no (or at least needs to be done in another PR).
---
Also see https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/pull/1655 with a bunch of discussion where I'm doing something similar.
I refactored the code:
- Removed handling of methods, as it felt entirely unnecessary
- Removed clippy utils (obviously...)
- Used some shiny compiler features
(let-else is very handy for lints 👀)
- I also renamed the lint to `for_loop_over_fallibles` (note: no `s`).
I'm not sure what's the naming convention here, so maybe I'm wrong.
Update CI to use Android NDK r25b
This commit updates the CI definitions to use the most recent Android LTS NDK release: r25b. Changes since the last NDK used by Rust negate the need to generate "standalone toolchains" and newer NDKs can be used in-place.
See https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/other_build_systems#overview
Remove empty core::lazy and std::lazy
PR #98165 with commits 7c360dc117 and c1a2db3372 has moved all of the components of these modules into different places, namely {std,core}::sync and {std,core}::cell. The empty modules remained. As they are unstable, we can simply remove them.
