Add FreeBSD as identifier not needing ticks
For the doc-markdown lint.
changelog: Add FreeBSD as identifier not needing ticks for ``[`doc-markdown`]`` lint.
Fix false positive on `semicolon_if_nothing_returned`
Currently the [`semicolon_if_nothing_returned`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned) lint fires in unwanted situations where a block only spans one line. An example of this was given in #7324. This code:
```rust
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
use std::ptr;
fn main() {
let mut s = MaybeUninit::<String>::uninit();
let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
}
```
yields the following clippy error:
```
error: consider adding a `;` to the last statement for consistent formatting
--> src/main.rs:6:26
|
6 | let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: add a `;` here: `ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr());`
|
= note: `-D clippy::semicolon-if-nothing-returned` implied by `-D clippy::pedantic`
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned
```
I updated the lint to check if the statement is inside an `unsafe` block, a closure or a normal block and if the block only spans one line, in that case the lint is not emitted.
This closes#7324.
changelog: enhanced semicolon if nothing returned according to #7324.
Refactoring identity function lints
I've noticed that we have several lints that all check for identity functions and each used their own check implementation. I moved the `is_expr_identity_function` function to `clippy_utils` and adapted all lints to reuse that one function. This should make the addition of new lints like this also easier in the future.
I've also moved the `map_identity` lint into the `methods` module. It's probably the best to review this PR by checking each commit individually. And that's it, have a great day 🙃
changelog: none
fix `while_let_on_iterator` suggestion in a closure
fixes: #7249
A future improvement would be to check if the closure is being used as `FnOnce`, in which case the original suggestion would be correct.
changelog: Suggest `&mut iter` inside a closure for `while_let_on_iterator`
Don't warn about `cfg!(..)` as a constant in assertions
This makes clippy understand that `cfg!(..)` is not just a hardcoded `true` or `false` (even though it expands to one of those).
cc `@khyperia`
changelog: Don't treat `cfg!(..)` as a constant in [`assertions-on-constants`]
Revert "CI: update rustup before installing the toolchain on windows"
This reverts commit 716d03f86b.
This is no longer necessary, since rustup 1.24.2 is now the default
version on the windows runner.
changelog: none
Add lint `manual_str_repeat`
fixes: #7260
There's a similar function for slices. Should this be renamed to include it, or should that be a separate lint? If we are going to have them as one lint a better name will be needed. `manual_repeat` isn't exactly clear as it's replacing a call to `iter::repeat`.
changelog: Add new lint `manual_str_repeat`
