It's quite possible that small programs don't use all of jemalloc, and building
with -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections allows the linker (via
--gc-sections) to strip out all unused code at link time. This decreases the
size of a "hello world" executable for me from 716K to 482K with no measurable
impact on link time. After this patch jemalloc is still the largest portion of
our hello world executables, but this helps cut down on the size at least
somewhat!
It's quite possible that small programs don't use all of jemalloc, and building
with -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections allows the linker (via
--gc-sections) to strip out all unused code at link time. This decreases the
size of a "hello world" executable for me from 716K to 482K with no measurable
impact on link time. After this patch jemalloc is still the largest portion of
our hello world executables, but this helps cut down on the size at least
somewhat!
This commit merges the `rustrt` crate into `std`, undoing part of the
facade. This merger continues the paring down of the runtime system.
Code relying on the public API of `rustrt` will break; some of this API
is now available through `std::rt`, but is likely to change and/or be
removed very soon.
[breaking-change]
If you configure with `--disable-docs`, the `doc` directory does not get generated, so
`cp -r doc dist/` fails when you `make dist{,-tar-bins,-doc}` or `make install`
Fix `make TAGS.emacs`.
@nikomatsakis has been complaining to me about this. (I had not noticed since I drive `ctags` with a separate script.)
(Suitable for a rollup build.)
Makes a couple changes that support the implementation of a REPL:
* Implementation of wrapper code for LLVM ExecutionEngine API
* Fixing a change I made earlier to reset compiler state in `phase_1_[...]`
instead of `compile_input` as the latter is not used in a REPL
- Support gcc-less installation on Windows. To do so in unattended mode run:`<intaller>.exe /TYPE=compact /SILENT`.
- Do not require admin privileges to install.
cc #19519
This is a work in progress, but this should get *extensive* review, so I'm putting it up early and often.
This is the start of a draft of the new 'ownership guide,' which explains ownership, borrowing, etc. I'm feeling better about this framing than last time's, but we'll see.
I stumbled across this today, and it's not really working. It's been around for a very, very long time, and seems to be based on stuff we don't even have anymore.
I asked in `#rust-internals`, and @cmr said we should just kill it, so here I am. :) I don't think that anything else uses Java, but maybe I missed something.
And if this _isn't_ what we want, I'm fine with closing too. Just some housekeeping.
This patch merges the `libsync` crate into `libstd`, undoing part of the
facade. This is in preparation for ultimately merging `librustrt`, as
well as the upcoming rewrite of `sync`.
Because this removes the `libsync` crate, it is a:
[breaking-change]
However, all uses of `libsync` should be able to reroute through
`std::sync` and `std::comm` instead.
This is a collection of misc issues I've run into while adding bindir & libdir support that aren't really bindir & libdir specific.
While I continue to fiddle with bindir and libdir bugs, I figured these might be useful for others to have merged.
Right now we'll end up globbing them into the accepted targets and (ever worse) they will override the make variables of real target files because we `include`d everything in that directory.
As a side effect, editors get a better hint on file types.
Fixies #11671
This commit changes default relative libdir 'lib' to a relative libdir calculated using LIBDIR provided by --libdir configuration option. In case if no option was provided behavior does not change.
We add CFG_LLVM_TARGET_$(target) (which can be defined in any of the
mk/cfg/* files) and supply a default to the plain target name
CFG_LLVM_TARGET mirrors the value of llvm_target (aka llvm-target) in
the librustc_back runtime target specification.
Without this, if we we're using a non-standard host libdir, the target
bindir would not exist (and rustc would fail to write to the
non-existent directory).
If the expected rustc snapshot is not where we expect it to be,
complain and fail at that point rather than creating a empty rustc file
and continuing until we try to run it.
