Add support for `ptr::write`s for the `invalid_reference_casting` lint
This PR adds support for `ptr::write` and others for the `invalid_reference_casting` lint.
Detecting instances where instead of using the deref (`*`) operator to assign someone uses `ptr::write`, `ptr::write_unaligned` or `ptr::write_volatile`.
```rust
let data_len = 5u64;
std::ptr::write(
std::mem::transmute::<*const u64, *mut u64>(&data_len),
new_data_len,
);
```
r? ``@est31``
Add regression test for not `memcpy`ing padding bytes
Closes#56297
See this comparison: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/jjzfonfcE
I don't have any experience with codegen tests, I hope this is correct
Don't do intra-pass validation on MIR shims
Fixes#114375
In the test that was committed, we end up generating the drop shim for `struct Foo` that looks like:
```
fn std::ptr::drop_in_place(_1: *mut Foo) -> () {
let mut _0: ();
bb0: {
goto -> bb5;
}
bb1: {
return;
}
bb2 (cleanup): {
resume;
}
bb3: {
goto -> bb1;
}
bb4 (cleanup): {
drop(((*_1).0: foo::WrapperWithDrop<()>)) -> [return: bb2, unwind terminate];
}
bb5: {
drop(((*_1).0: foo::WrapperWithDrop<()>)) -> [return: bb3, unwind: bb2];
}
}
```
In `bb4` and `bb5`, we assert that `(*_1).0` has type `WrapperWithDrop<()>`. However, In a user-facing param env, the type is actually `WrapperWithDrop<Tait>`. These types are not equal in a user-facing param-env (and can't be made equal even if we use `DefiningAnchor::Bubble`, since it's a non-local TAIT).
Use the same DISubprogram for each instance of the same inlined function within a caller
# Issue Details:
The call to `panic` within a function like `Option::unwrap` is translated to LLVM as a `tail call` (as it will never return), when multiple calls to the same function like this is inlined LLVM will notice the common `tail call` block (i.e., loading the same panic string + location info and then calling `panic`) and merge them together.
When merging these instructions together, LLVM will also attempt to merge the debug locations as well, but this fails (i.e., debug info is dropped) as Rust emits a new `DISubprogram` at each inline site thus LLVM doesn't recognize that these are actually the same function and so thinks that there isn't a common debug location.
As an example of this when building for x86_64 Windows (note the lack of `.cv_loc` before the call to `panic`, thus it will be attributed to the same line at the `addq` instruction):
```
.cv_loc 0 1 23 0 # src\lib.rs:23:0
addq $40, %rsp
retq
leaq .Lalloc_f570dea0a53168780ce9a91e67646421(%rip), %rcx
leaq .Lalloc_629ace53b7e5b76aaa810d549cc84ea3(%rip), %r8
movl $43, %edx
callq _ZN4core9panicking5panic17h12e60b9063f6dee8E
int3
```
# Fix Details:
Cache the `DISubprogram` emitted for each inlined function instance within a caller so that this can be reused if that instance is encountered again, this also requires caching the `DILexicalBlock` and `DIVariable` objects to avoid creating duplicates.
After this change the above assembly now looks like:
```
.cv_loc 0 1 23 0 # src\lib.rs:23:0
addq $40, %rsp
retq
.cv_inline_site_id 5 within 0 inlined_at 1 0 0
.cv_inline_site_id 6 within 5 inlined_at 1 12 0
.cv_loc 6 2 935 0 # library\core\src\option.rs:935:0
leaq .Lalloc_5f55955de67e57c79064b537689facea(%rip), %rcx
leaq .Lalloc_e741d4de8cb5801e1fd7a6c6795c1559(%rip), %r8
movl $43, %edx
callq _ZN4core9panicking5panic17hde1558f32d5b1c04E
int3
```
Warn on elided lifetimes in associated constants (`ELIDED_LIFETIMES_IN_ASSOCIATED_CONSTANT`)
Elided lifetimes in associated constants (in impls) erroneously resolve to fresh lifetime parameters on the impl since #97313. This is not correct behavior (see #38831).
I originally opened #114716 to fix this, but given the time that has passed, the crater results seem pretty bad: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114716#issuecomment-1682091952
This PR alternatively implements a lint against this behavior, and I'm hoping to bump this to deny in a few versions.
Add `suggestion` for some `#[deprecated]` items
Consider code:
```rust
fn main() {
let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
}
```
Currently it shows deprecated warning:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated method `std::slice::<impl [T]>::connect`: renamed to join
--> src/main.rs:2:24
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
```
This PR adds `suggestion` for `connect` and some other deprecated items, so the warning will be changed to this:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated method `std::slice::<impl [T]>::connect`: renamed to join
--> src/main.rs:2:24
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
help: replace the use of the deprecated method
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].join(" ");
| ^^^^
```
Add projection obligations when comparing impl too
Fixes#115033
In the test, when we ask for WF obligations of `DatasetIter<'a, ArrayBase<D>>`, we get back two important obligations: `[<D as Data>::Elem -> ?1, ?1: 'a]`. If we don't add the projection obligation, `?1` remains unconstrained.
An alternative solution would be to use unnormalized obligations, where we only have one relevant obligation: `<D as Data>::Elem: 'a`. This would leave no inference vars unconstrained.
Add MIR validation for unwind out from nounwind functions + fixes to make validation pass
`@Nilstrieb` This is the MIR validation you asked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112403#discussion_r1222739722.
Two passes need to be fixed to get the validation to pass:
* `RemoveNoopLandingPads` currently unconditionally introduce a resume block (even there is none to begin with!), changed to not do that
* Generator state transform introduces a `assert` which may unwind, and its drop elaboration also introduces many new `UnwindAction`s, so in this case run the AbortUnwindingCalls after the transformation.
I believe this PR should also fixRust-for-Linux/linux#1016, cc `@ojeda`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
custom_mir: change Call() terminator syntax to something more readable
I find our current syntax very hard to read -- I cannot even remember the order of arguments, and having the "next block" *before* the actual function call is very counter-intuitive IMO. So I suggest we use `Call(ret_val = function(v), next_block)` instead.
r? `@JakobDegen`
Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format
Follow-up of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111459.
This test needed more cleanup: first I removed duplication by using a function, then I merge similar rules which had the same values.
r? `@notriddle`
Avoid side-effects from `try_coerce` when suggesting borrowing LHS of cast
The name `try_coerce` is a bit misleading -- it has side-effects, so when it's used in diagnostics code, it sometimes causes spurious obligations to be registered which cause other errors to occur that really make no sense in context.
Addendum: let's just rename `try_coerce` to `coerce` -- the `try_` part doesn't really add much, imo.
Normalize return type of `deduce_future_output_from_obligations`
Fixes#114909
Also confirmed to fix#114727 manually
Now that we have weak/lazy type aliases, we need to normalize those in future signatures to ensure that `replace_opaque_types_with_inference_vars` actually sees TAITs behind them. This isn't needed in the new solver, but added a test to make sure it doesn't regress there either.
r? types cc `@oli-obk` (who's gone, worst case can delay this PR until he's back)
Fix ABI flags in RISC-V/LoongArch ELF file generated by rustc
Fix#114153
It turns out the current way to set these flags are completely wrong. In LLVM the target ABI is used instead of target features to determine these flags.
Not sure how to write a test though. Or maybe a test isn't necessary because this affects only those touching target json?
r? `@Nilstrieb`
rustdoc: Add lint `redundant_explicit_links`
Closes#87799.
- Lint warns by default
- Reworks link parser to cache original link's display text
r? `@jyn514`
`ignore-cross-compile` on `optimization-remarks-dir-pgo` test
We noticed this on our upstream pull on ferrocene a week ago as it was failing our CI. The test attempts to run the produced binary which won't work when cross compiling.
`Nonterminal`-related cleanups
In #114647 I am trying to remove `Nonterminal`. It has a number of preliminary cleanups that are worth merging even if #114647 doesn't merge, so let's do them in this PR.
r? `@petrochenkov`
