Forward-compatibly deny drops in constants if they *could* actually run.
This is part of #40036, specifically the checks for user-defined destructor invocations on locals which *may not* have been moved away, the motivating example being:
```rust
const FOO: i32 = (HasDrop {...}, 0).1;
```
The evaluation of constant MIR will continue to create `'static` slots for more locals than is necessary (if `Storage{Live,Dead}` statements are ignored), but it shouldn't be misusable.
r? @nikomatsakis
Fix destruction extent lookup during HIR -> HAIR translation
My method for finding the destruction extent, if any, from cbed41a174aad44e069bec09bf1e502591c132ae (in #39409), was buggy in that it sometimes failed to find an extent that was nonetheless present.
This fixes that, and is cleaner code to boot.
Fix#43457
rustc: Start moving toward "try_get is a bug" for incremental
This PR is an effort to burn down some of the work items on #42633. The basic change here was to leave the `try_get` function exposed but have it return a `DiagnosticBuilder` instead of a `CycleError`. This means that it should be a compiler bug to *not* handle the error as dropping a diagnostic should result in a complier panic.
After that change it was then necessary to update the compiler's callsites of `try_get` to handle the error coming out. These were handled as:
* The `sized_constraint` and `needs_drop_raw` checks take the diagnostic and defer it as a compiler bug. This was a new piece of functionality added to the error handling infrastructure, and the idea is that for both these checks a "real" compiler error should be emitted elsewhere, so it's only a bug if we don't actually emit the complier error elsewhere.
* MIR inlining was updated to just ignore the diagnostic. This is being tracked by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43542 which sounded like it either already had some work underway or was planning to change regardless.
* The final case, `item_path`, is still sort of up for debate. At the time of this writing this PR simply removes the invocations of `try_get` there, assuming that the query will always succeed. This turns out to be true for the test suite anyway! It sounds like, though, that this logic was intended to assist in "weird" situations like `RUST_LOG` where debug implementations can trigger at any time. This PR would therefore, however, break those implementations.
I'm unfortunately sort of out of ideas on how to handle `item_path`, but other thoughts would be welcome!
Closes#42633
(This crept in during the shift from a transform to a query; I didn't
notice because my muscle memory was still always passing `-Z
mir-borrowck`, while my test cases *also* had the
`#[rustc_mir_borrowck]` attribute attached to them.)
Generate builtin impls for `Clone`
This fixes a long-standing ICE and limitation where some builtin types implement `Copy` but not `Clone` (whereas `Clone` is a super trait of `Copy`).
However, this PR has a few side-effects:
* `Clone` is now marked as a lang item.
* `[T; N]` is now `Clone` if `T: Clone` (currently, only if `T: Copy` and for `N <= 32`).
* `fn foo<'a>() where &'a mut (): Clone { }` won't compile anymore because of how bounds for builtin traits are handled (e.g. same thing currently if you replace `Clone` by `Copy` in this example). Of course this function is unusable anyway, an error would pop as soon as it is called.
Hence, I'm wondering wether this PR would need an RFC...
Also, cc-ing @nikomatsakis, @arielb1.
Related issues: #28229, #24000.
Mir borrowck as query
Turn the `mir-borrowck` pass (aka "transform") into a query.
(If I had realized how relatively easy this was going to be, I would have made it part of #43108. `let hindsight = 20/20;`)
rustc: Add `Local` to the HIR map of parents
When walking parents for lints we want to be sure to hit `let` statements which
can have attributes, so hook up these statements in the HIR map.
Closes#43910
