Add known-bug for #95034
Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.
cc #95034 (does not fix)
check_doc_alias_value: get argument as Symbol to prevent needless string convertions
check_doc_attrs: don't alloc vec, iterate over slice. Vec introduced in #83149, but no perf run posted on merge
replace as_str() check with symbol check
get_single_str_from_tts: don't prealloc string
trivial string to str replace
LifetimeScopeForPath::NonElided use Vec<Symbol> instead of Vec<String>
AssertModuleSource use BTreeSet<Symbol> instead of BTreeSet<String>
CrateInfo.crate_name replace FxHashMap<CrateNum, String> with FxHashMap<CrateNum, Symbol>
make windows compat_fn (crudely) work on Miri
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95469, Windows `compat_fn!` now has to be supported by Miri to even make stdout work. Unfortunately, it relies on some outside-of-Rust linker hacks (`#[link_section = ".CRT$XCU"]`) that are rather hard to make work in Miri. So I came up with this crude hack to make this stuff work in Miri regardless. It should come at no cost for regular executions, so I hope this is okay.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95627 `@ChrisDenton`
Fix `x test src/tools/error_index_generator --stage {0,1}`
There were two fixes needed:
1. Use `top_stage` instead of `top_stage - 1`. There was a long and torturous comment about trying to match rustdoc's version, but it works better without the hard-coding than with (before it gave errors that `libtest.so` couldn't be found).
2. Make sure that `ci-llvm/lib` is added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Previously the error index would be unable to load LLVM for stage0 builds.
At some point we should probably have a discussion about how rustdoc stages should be numbered;
confusion between 0/1/2 has come up several times in bootstrap now. cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92538
Note that this is still broken when using `download-rustc = true` and `--stage 1`,
but that's *really* a corner case and should affect almost no one. `--stage {0,2}`
work fine with download-rustc.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80096.
This commit suggests replacing typeof(...) with an actual type of "...",
for example in case of `typeof(1)` we suggest replacing it with `i32`.
If the expression
- Is not const (`{ let a = 1; let _: typeof(a); }`)
- Can't be found (`let _: typeof(this_variable_does_not_exist)`)
- Or has non-suggestable type (closure, generator, error, etc)
we don't suggest anything.
Report opaque type mismatches directly during borrowck of the function instead of within the `type_of` query.
This allows us to only store a single hidden type per opaque type instead of having to store one per set of substitutions.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This does not affect diagnostics, because the diagnostic messages are exactly the same.
Allow raw lint descriptions
update_lints now understands raw strings in declare_clippy_lint descriptions.
Supersedes #8655
cc `@Alexendoo` thanks for addressing this so quickly. I build a little bit simpler version of your patch. I don't think it really matters what `Literal` we're trying to tokenize, since we assume later, that it is some sort of `str`.
changelog: none
Add a lint to detect cast to unsigned for abs() and suggest unsigned_…
…abs()
changelog: Add a [`cast_abs_to_unsigned`] that checks for uses of `abs()` that are cast to the corresponding unsigned integer type and suggest to replace them with `unsigned_abs()`.
Fix `as_deref_mut` false positives in `needless_option_as_deref`
Also moves it into `methods/`
Fixes#7846Fixes#8047
changelog: [`needless_option_as_deref`]: No longer lints for `as_deref_mut` on Options that cannot be moved
supersedes #8064
Use gender neutral terms
#95508 was not executed well, but it did find a couple of legitimate issues: some uses of unnecessarily gendered language, and some typos. This PR fixes (properly) the legitimate issues it found.
Correct safety reasoning in `str::make_ascii_{lower,upper}case()`
I don't understand why the previous comment was used (it was inserted in #66564), but it doesn't explain why these functions are safe, only why `str::as_bytes{_mut}()` are safe.
If someone thinks they make perfect sense, I'm fine with closing this PR.
Regression test for #82866
Saw that this issue was open when i was cleaning my old branch for #92237.
I am also not opposed to not adding an extra test and just closing #82866.
Fixes#82866
Stop flagging unexpected inner attributes as outer ones in certain diagnostics
Fixes#94340.
In the issue to-be-fixed I write that the general message _an inner attribute is not permitted in this context_ should be more specific noting that the “context” is the `include` macro. This, however, cannot be achieved without touching a lot of things and passing a flag to the `parse_expr` and `parse_item` calls in `expand_include`. This seems rather hacky to me. That's why I left it as it. `Span::from_expansion` does not apply either AFAIK.
`@rustbot` label A-diagnostics T-compiler
