at least that's what the docs say: http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/fn.from_raw_parts.html
A few situations got prettier. In some situations the mutability of the resulting and source pointers differed (and was cast away by transmute), the mutability matches now.
Reduce code size overhead from core::panicking::panic
core::panicking::panic currently creates an Arguments structure using
format_args!("{}", expr), which formats the expr str using the Display::fmt.
Display::fmt pulls in Formatter::pad, which then also pulls in string-related
code for truncation and padding.
If core::panicking::panic instead creates an Arguments structure with a string
piece, it is possible that the Display::fmt function for str can be optimized
out of the program.
In my testing with a 32-bit x86 bare metal program, the change tended to save
between ~100 bytes and ~5500 bytes, depending on what other panic* functions
the program invokes and whether the panic_fmt lang item uses the Arguments
value.
I've made some minor changes from the implementation attached to the RFC to try to minimize codegen. The methods now take `&Debug` trait objects rather than being parameterized and there are inlined stub methods that call to non-inlined methods to do the work.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @huonw for the `derive(Debug)` changes.
These new APIs have had some time to bake now, and no pressing issues have come
up so they should be ok for stabilizing. Specifically, these two APIs were
stabilized:
* `slice::from_raw_parts`
* `slice::from_raw_parts_mut`
Display::fmt for str calls into Formatter::pad, which is modest in size
and also pulls in string-related functions for its truncation and padding
abilities. For size-critical programs (e.g. embedded), this call site
may be the only reason Formatter::pad is linked into the output.
This commit performs another pass over the `std::char` module for stabilization.
Some minor cleanup is performed such as migrating documentation from libcore to
libunicode (where the `std`-facing trait resides) as well as a slight
reorganiation in libunicode itself. Otherwise, the stability modifications made
are:
* `char::from_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::is_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_{lower,upper}case` are now stable after being modified to return
an iterator over characters. While the implementation today has not changed
this should allow us to implement the full set of case conversions in unicode
where some characters can map to multiple when doing an upper or lower case
mapping.
* `StrExt::to_{lower,upper}case` was added as unstable for a convenience of not
having to worry about characters expanding to more characters when you just
want the whole string to get into upper or lower case.
This is a breaking change due to the change in the signatures of the
`CharExt::to_{upper,lower}case` methods. Code can be updated to use functions
like `flat_map` or `collect` to handle the difference.
[breaking-change]
Closes#20333
This commit performs another pass over the `std::char` module for stabilization.
Some minor cleanup is performed such as migrating documentation from libcore to
libunicode (where the `std`-facing trait resides) as well as a slight
reorganiation in libunicode itself. Otherwise, the stability modifications made
are:
* `char::from_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::is_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_digit` is now stable
* `CharExt::to_{lower,upper}case` are now stable after being modified to return
an iterator over characters. While the implementation today has not changed
this should allow us to implement the full set of case conversions in unicode
where some characters can map to multiple when doing an upper or lower case
mapping.
* `StrExt::to_{lower,upper}case` was added as unstable for a convenience of not
having to worry about characters expanding to more characters when you just
want the whole string to get into upper or lower case.
This is a breaking change due to the change in the signatures of the
`CharExt::to_{upper,lower}case` methods. Code can be updated to use functions
like `flat_map` or `collect` to handle the difference.
[breaking-change]
These new APIs have had some time to bake now, and no pressing issues have come
up so they should be ok for stabilizing. Specifically, these two APIs were
stabilized:
* `slice::from_raw_parts`
* `slice::from_raw_parts_mut`
Switching from generic bounds to trait objects and having un-inlined
inner methods should cut down on the size of Debug impls, since we care
about the speed of a Debug implementation way less than binary bloat.
This may not be quite ready to go out, I fixed some docs but suspect I missed a bunch.
I also wound up fixing a bunch of redundant `[]` suffixes, but on closer inspection I don't believe that can land until after a snapshot.
This concretely improves type inference of some cases (see included
test). I assume the compiler struggles to reason about multiple layers
of generic type parameters (even with associated-type equalities) but
*can* understand pure associated types, since they are always directly
computable from the input types.
Thanks to @shepmaster for noticing the issue with `Cloned` (I took that example as a test case).
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 563][rfc] which adds a new
`cfg(debug_assertions)` directive which is specially recognized and calculated
by the compiler. The flag is turned off at any optimization level greater than 1
and may also be explicitly controlled through the `-C debug-assertions`
flag.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/563
The `debug_assert!` and `debug_assert_eq!` macros now respect this instead of
the `ndebug` variable and `ndebug` no longer holds any meaning to the standard
library.
Code which was previously relying on `not(ndebug)` to gate expensive code should
be updated to rely on `debug_assertions` instead.
Closes#22492
[breaking-change]
Unstable items used in a macro expansion will now always trigger
stability warnings, *unless* the unstable items are directly inside a
macro marked with `#[allow_internal_unstable]`. IOW, the compiler warns
unless the span of the unstable item is a subspan of the definition of a
macro marked with that attribute.
E.g.
#[allow_internal_unstable]
macro_rules! foo {
($e: expr) => {{
$e;
unstable(); // no warning
only_called_by_foo!();
}}
}
macro_rules! only_called_by_foo {
() => { unstable() } // warning
}
foo!(unstable()) // warning
The unstable inside `foo` is fine, due to the attribute. But the
`unstable` inside `only_called_by_foo` is not, since that macro doesn't
have the attribute, and the `unstable` passed into `foo` is also not
fine since it isn't contained in the macro itself (that is, even though
it is only used directly in the macro).
In the process this makes the stability tracking much more precise,
e.g. previously `println!(\"{}\", unstable())` got no warning, but now it
does. As such, this is a bug fix that may cause [breaking-change]s.
The attribute is definitely feature gated, since it explicitly allows
side-stepping the feature gating system.
---
This updates `thread_local!` macro to use the attribute, since it uses
unstable features internally (initialising a struct with unstable
fields).
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 563][rfc] which adds a new
`cfg(debug_assertions)` directive which is specially recognized and calculated
by the compiler. The flag is turned off at any optimization level greater than 1
and may also be explicitly controlled through the `-C debug-assertions`
flag.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/563
The `debug_assert!` and `debug_assert_eq!` macros now respect this instead of
the `ndebug` variable and `ndebug` no longer holds any meaning to the standard
library.
Code which was previously relying on `not(ndebug)` to gate expensive code should
be updated to rely on `debug_assertions` instead.
Closes#22492
[breaking-change]
Unstable items used in a macro expansion will now always trigger
stability warnings, *unless* the unstable items are directly inside a
macro marked with `#[allow_internal_unstable]`. IOW, the compiler warns
unless the span of the unstable item is a subspan of the definition of a
macro marked with that attribute.
E.g.
#[allow_internal_unstable]
macro_rules! foo {
($e: expr) => {{
$e;
unstable(); // no warning
only_called_by_foo!();
}}
}
macro_rules! only_called_by_foo {
() => { unstable() } // warning
}
foo!(unstable()) // warning
The unstable inside `foo` is fine, due to the attribute. But the
`unstable` inside `only_called_by_foo` is not, since that macro doesn't
have the attribute, and the `unstable` passed into `foo` is also not
fine since it isn't contained in the macro itself (that is, even though
it is only used directly in the macro).
In the process this makes the stability tracking much more precise,
e.g. previously `println!("{}", unstable())` got no warning, but now it
does. As such, this is a bug fix that may cause [breaking-change]s.
The attribute is definitely feature gated, since it explicitly allows
side-stepping the feature gating system.
This concretely improves type inference of some cases (see included
test). I assume the compiler struggles to reason about multiple layers
of generic type parameters (even with associated-type equalities) but
*can* understand pure associated types, since they are always directly
computable from the input types.
Automatic has-same-types testing methodology can be found in #22501.
Because most of them don't work with `--pretty=typed`, compile-fail tests were manually audited.
r? @aturon
This stability attribute was left out by accident and the stability pass has
since picked up the ability to check for this. As a result, crates are currently
getting warnings for implementations of `Index`.
This stability attribute was left out by accident and the stability pass has
since picked up the ability to check for this. As a result, crates are currently
getting warnings for implementations of `Index`.
Rebase and follow-through on work done by @cmr and @aatch.
Implements most of rust-lang/rfcs#560. Errors encountered from the checks during building were fixed.
The checks for division, remainder and bit-shifting have not been implemented yet.
See also PR #20795
cc @Aatch ; cc @nikomatsakis