Add assist to generate trait impl's
resolves#13553
This pull request adds a `generate_trait_impl` assist, which generates trait impl's for a type. It is almost the same as the one to generate impl's and I also reduced the trigger range to only outside the `RecordFieldList`. Also moved all the tests into separate test functions. A few of the old tests seemed redundant, so I didn't port them.
fix: format expression parsing edge-cases
- Handle positional arguments with formatting options (i.e. `{:b}`). Previously copied `:b` as an argument, producing broken code.
- Handle indexed positional arguments (`{0}`) ([reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#positional-parameters)). Previously copied over `0` as an argument.
Note: the assist also breaks when named arguments are used (`"{name}$0", name = 2 + 2` is converted to `"{}"$0, name`. I'm working on fix for that as well.
Feat: extracted method from trait impl is placed in existing impl
**Before**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183872883-3b0eafd2-d1dc-440e-9e66-38e3372f8b64.mp4
**After**
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1759192/183875769-87f34c7d-52f0-4dfc-9766-f591ee738ebb.mp4
Previously, when triggering a method extraction from within an impl trait block, then this would always create a new impl block for
the struct, even if there already is one. Now, if there is already an existing trait-less impl block, then it'll put the extracted method in there.
**Caveats**:
- It currently requires the target impl block to be non-empty. This limitation is because the current architecture takes a `node_to_insert_after` as reference for where to insert the extracted function. An empty impl block doesn't have such a reference node, since it's empty. It seems that supporting this requires a much larger and more complex change.
- This is my first contribution in rust, so apologies for any beginner mistakes.
internal: Migrate `ide_assists::utils` and `ide_assists::handlers` to use format arg captures (part 1)
This not only serves as making future migration to mutable syntax trees easier, it also finds out what needs to be migrated in the first place.
~~Aside from the first commit, subsequent commits are structured to only deal with one file/handler at a time.~~
This is the first of 3 PRs, migrating:
Utils:
- `gen_trait_fn_body`
- `render_snippet`
- `ReferenceConversion`
- `convert_type`
- `getter`
Handlers:
- `add_explicit_type`
- `add_return_type`
- `add_turbo_fish`
- `apply_demorgan`
- `auto_import`
- `convert_comment_block`
- `convert_integer_literal`
- `convert_into_to_from`
- `convert_iter_for_each_to_for`
- `convert_let_else_to_match`
- `convert_tuple_struct_to_named_struct`
- `convert_two_arm_bool_match_to_matches_macro`
- `destructure_tuple_binding`
- `extract_function`
- `extract_module`
- `extract_struct_from_enum_variant`
- `extract_type_alias`
- `extract_variable`
- `fix_visibility`
feat: add config for inserting must_use in `generate_enum_as_method`
Should fix#13312
Didn't add a test because I was not sure on how to add test for a specific configuration option, tried to look for the usages for other `AssistConfig` variants but couldn't find any in `tests`. If there is a way to test this, do point me towards it.
I tried to extract the formatting string as a common `template_string` and only have if-else for that, but it didn't compile :(
Also it seems these tests are failing:
```
test config::tests::generate_config_documentation ... FAILED
test config::tests::generate_package_json_config ... FAILED
```
Can you also point me to how to correct these 😅 ( I guess there is some command to automatically generate these? )
Add convert_named_struct_to_tuple_struct assist
Closes#11643, since the assist for converting in the other direction is already there (I based most of the implementation and all of the tests on it).
Restructure `find_path` into a separate functions for modules and non-module items
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/13212
Also renames `prefer_core` imports config to `prefer_no_std` and changes the behavior of no_std path searching by preferring `core` paths `over` alloc
This PR turned into a slight rewrite, so it unfortunately does a few more things that I initially planned to (including a bug fix for enum variant paths)
New assist: move_format_string_arg
The name might need some improving.
```rust
fn main() {
print!("{x + 1}");
}
```
to
```rust
fn main() {
print!("{}"$0, x + 1);
}
```
fixes#13180
ref to #5988 for similar work
* extracted `format_like`'s parser to it's own module in `ide-db`
* reworked the parser's API to be more direct
* added assist to extract expressions in format args
The name might need some improving.
extract format_like's parser to it's own module in ide-db
reworked the parser's API to be more direct
added assist to extract expressions in format args
feature: Assist to turn match into matches! invocation
Resolves#12510
This PR adds an assist, which convert 2-arm match that evaluates to a boolean into the equivalent matches! invocation.
fix: Only move comments when extracting a struct from an enum variant
Motivating example:
```rs
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
enum Error {
/// Some explanation for this error
#[error("message")]
$0Woops {
code: u32
}
}
```
now becomes
```rs
/// Some explanation for this error
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
struct Woops{
code: u32
}
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
enum Error {
#[error("message")]
Woops(Woops)
}
```
(the `thiserror::Error` derive being copied and the struct formatting aren't ideal, though those are issues for another day)
Use correct type in "Replace turbofish with type"
And support `?` and `.await` expressions.
Fixes#13148.
The assist can still show up even if the turbofish's type is not used at all, e.g.:
```rust
fn foo<T>() {}
let v = foo::<i32>();
```
I implemented that by checking the expressions' type.
This could probably be implemented better by taking the function's return type and substituting the generic parameter with the provided turbofish, but this is more complicated.
feat: Generate static method using Self::assoc() syntax
This change improves the `generate_function` assist to support generating static methods/associated functions using the `Self::assoc()` syntax. Previously, one could generate a static method, but only when specifying the type name directly (like `Foo::assoc()`). After this change, `Self` is supported as well as the type name.
Fixes#13012
feat: Add an assist for inlining all type alias uses
## Description
`inline_type_alias_uses` assist tries to inline all selected type alias occurrences.
### Currently
Type alias used in `PathType` position are inlined.
### Not supported
- Removing type alias declaration if all uses are inlined.
- Removing redundant imports after inlining all uses in the file.
- Type alias not in `PathType` position, such as:
- `A::new()`
- `let x = A {}`
- `let bits = A::BITS`
- etc.
## Demonstration
## Related Issues
Partially fixes#10881
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
There are also some other typos in the function names, variable names, and file
names, which I leave as they are. I'm more certain that typos in comments
should be fixed.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
This change improves the `generate_function` assist to support generating static methods/associated functions using the `Self::assoc()` syntax. Previously, one could generate a static method, but only when specifying the type name directly (like `Foo::assoc()`). After this change, `Self` is supported as well as the type name.
Fixes#13012
Previously, when triggering a method extraction from within a trait
impl block, then this would always create a new impl block for
the struct, even if there already is one. Now, it'll put the extracted
method in the matching existing block if it exists.
fix: don't replace default members' body
cc #12779, #12821
addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/12821#issuecomment-1190157506
`gen_trait_fn_body()` only attempts to implement required trait member functions, so we shouldn't call it for `Implement default members` assist.
This patch also documents the precondition of `gen_trait_fn_body()` and inserts `debug_assert!`, but I'm not entirely sure if the assertions are appropriate.
