fix(completion): make the expected type a tad smarter with `Fn`s
This commit changes how the expected type is calculated when
working with Fn pointers, making the parenthesis stop vanishing
when completing the function name.
I've been bugged by the behavior of parenthesis completion for
a long while now. R-a assumes that the `LetStmt` type is the same
as the function type I've just written. Worse is that all parenthesis
vanish, even from functions that have completely different signatures.
It will now verify if the signature is the same.
While working on this, I noticed that record fields behave the same,
so I also made it prioritize the field type instead of the current
expression when possible, but I'm unsure if this is OK, so input is
appreciated.
ImplTraits as return types will still behave weirdly because lowering
is disallowed at the time it resolves the function types.
* Extracted the function `for_unique_generic_name` that handling generics with identical names for reusability.
* Renamed `for_generic_params` to `for_impl_trait_as_generic` for clarity
* Added documentations for `for_impl_trait_as_generic` and `for_unique_generic_name`
This commit changes how the expected type is calculated when working
with Fn pointers, making the parenthesis stop vanishing when completing
the function name.
I've been bugged by the behaviour on parenthesis completion for a long
while now. R-a assumes that the `LetStmt` type is the same as the
function type I've just written. Worse is that all parenthesis vanish,
even from functions that have completely different signatures. It will
now verify if the signature is the same.
While working on this, I noticed that record fields behave the same, so
I also made it prioritize the field type instead of the current
expression when possible, but I'm unsure if this is OK, so input is
appreciated.
ImplTraits as return types will still behave weirdly because lowering is
disallowed at the time it resolves the function types.
fix: rewrite code_action `generate_delegate_trait`
I've made substantial enhancements to the "generate delegate trait" code action in rust-analyzer. Here's a summary of the changes:
#### Resolved the "Can’t find CONST_ARG@158..159 in AstIdMap" error
Fix#15804, fix#15968, fix#15108
The issue stemmed from an incorrect application of PathTransform in the original code. Previously, a new 'impl' was generated first and then transformed, causing PathTransform to fail in locating the correct AST node, resulting in an error. I rectified this by performing the transformation before generating the new 'impl' (using make::impl_trait), ensuring a step-by-step transformation of associated items.
#### Rectified generation of `Self` type
`generate_delegate_trait` is unable to properly handle trait with `Self` type.
Let's take the following code as an example:
```rust
trait Trait {
fn f() -> Self;
}
struct B {}
impl Trait for B {
fn f() -> B { B{} }
}
struct S {
b: B,
}
```
Here, if we implement `Trait` for `S`, the type of `f` should be `() -> Self`, i.e. `() -> S`. However we cannot automatically generate a function that constructs `S`.
To ensure that the code action doesn't generate delegate traits for traits with Self types, I add a function named `has_self_type` to handle it.
#### Extended support for generics in structs and fields within this code action
The former version of `generate_delegate_trait` cannot handle structs with generics properly. Here's an example:
```rust
struct B<T> {
a: T
}
trait Trait<T> {
fn f(a: T);
}
impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1> for B<T2> {
fn f(a: T1) -> T2 { self.a }
}
struct A {}
struct S {
b$0 : B<A>,
}
```
The former version will generates improper code:
```rust
impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1, T2> for S {
fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 {
<B as Trait<T1, T2>>::f( &self.b , a)
}
}
```
The rewritten version can handle generics properly:
```rust
impl<T1> Trait<T1> for S {
fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 {
<B<A> as Trait<T1>>::f(&self.b, a)
}
}
```
See more examples in added unit tests.
I enabled support for generic structs in `generate_delegate_trait` through the following steps (using the code example provided):
1. Initially, to prevent conflicts between the generic parameters in struct `S` and the ones in the impl of `B`, I renamed the generic parameters of `S`.
2. Then, since `B`'s parameters are instantiated within `S`, the original generic parameters of `B` needed removal within `S` (to avoid errors from redundant parameters). An important consideration here arises when Trait and B share parameters in `B`'s impl. In such cases, these shared generic parameters cannot be removed.
3. Next, I addressed the matching of types between `B`'s type in `S` and its type in the impl. Given that some generic parameters in the impl are instantiated in `B`, I replaced these parameters with their instantiated results using PathTransform. For instance, in the example provided, matching `B<A>` and `B<T2>`, where `T2` is instantiated as `A`, I replaced all occurrences of `T2` in the impl with `A` (i.e. apply the instantiated generic arguments to the params).
4. Finally, I performed transformations on each assoc item (also to prevent the initial issue) and handled redundant where clauses.
For a more detailed explanation, please refer to the code and comments. I welcome suggestions and any further questions!
When #118865 started enforcing the `rustc::potential_query_instability` lint in
`rustc_codegen_llvm`, it added an exemption for this site, arguing that the
entries are only used to create a list of filenames that is later sorted.
However, the list of entries also gets traversed when creating the function
coverage records in LLVM IR, which may be sensitive to hash-based ordering.
This patch therefore changes `function_coverage_map` to use `FxIndexMap`, which
should avoid hash-based instability by iterating in insertion order.
fix: self type replacement in inline-function
Fix#16113, fix#16091
The problem described in this issue actually involves three bugs.
Firstly, when using `ted` to modify the syntax tree, the offset of nodes on the tree changes, which causes the syntax range information from `hir` to become invalid. Therefore, we need to edit the AST after the last usage for `usages_for_locals`.
The second issue is that when inserting nodes, it's necessary to use `clone_subtree` for duplication because the `ted::replace` operation essentially moves a node.
The third issue is that we should use `ancestors_with_macros` instead of `ancestors` to handle impl definition in macros.
I have fixed the three bugs mentioned above and added unit tests.
internal: Migrate assists to the structured snippet API, part 5
Continuing from #15874
Migrates the following assists:
- `extract_variable`
- `generate_function`
- `replace_is_some_with_if_let_some`
- `replace_is_ok_with_if_let_ok`
Don't trim trailing whitespace from doc comments
Don't trim trailing whitespace from doc comments as multiple trailing spaces indicates a hard line break in Markdown.
I'd have liked to add a unit test for `docs_from_attrs`, but couldn't find a reasonable way to get an `&Attrs` object for use in the test.
Fixes#15877.
fix: make callable fields not complete in method access no parens case
Follow up PR for #15879
Fixes the callable field completion appearing in the method access with no parens case.
fix: no code action 'introduce_named_generic' for impl inside types
Fix#15734.
### Changes Made
- Find params in `ancestors` instead of just `parent`
- Added tests (`replace_impl_with_mut` and `replace_impl_inside`)
fix: Correct references from `rust-analyzer.cargo.check` to `rust-analyzer.check`
When reading the manual, I noticed that the documentation referenced configurations that have since been renamed. This PR updates those references to their new names.
fix: assists panic when trying to edit usage inside macro
When we try to make a syntax node mutable inside a macro to edit it, it seems like the edits aren't properly reflected and will cause a panic when trying to make another syntax node mutable.
This PR changes `bool_to_enum` and `promote_local_to_const` to use the original syntax range instead to edit the original file instead of the macro file. I'm not sure how to do it for `inline_call` with the example I mentioned in the issue, so I've left it out for now.
Fixes#15807
internal: Expose whether a channel has been dropped in lsp-server errors
Not the best way to expose this, but this should allow us to give somewhat better errors when the initialization request is malformed, as currently that just results in a channel disconnected error instead of the deserialization error. cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/15859
