syntax: Avoid span arithmetic for delimiter tokens
The +/-1 logic is from the time where the whole group had a single span and the delimiter spans had to be calculated from it.
Now the delimiters have their own spans which are constructed by lexer or proc macro API and can be used directly.
If those spans are not perfect, then it should be fixed by tweaking the corresponding lexer logic rather than by trying to add or substract `1` from the span boundaries.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62524
r? @estebank
Move has_panic_handler to query
Moves us off of a global Once instead re-querying the lang item each time. The conditions on when we set it to true change a little (previously we'd make sure a few more lang items were `Some`) but I think they in practice don't matter, we won't compile later on if we don't have them.
Remove `PartialEq` and `Eq` from the `SpecialDerives`.
Now that PR #65519 landed, this is the follow-on work of removing `PartialEq` and `Eq` from the set of `SpecialDerives` .
The existing code (which looks like it was copied from MIPS) passes
aggregates by value in registers. This is wrong. According to the SVR4
powerpc psABI, all aggregates are passed indirectly.
See #64259 for more discussion, which addresses the ABI for the special
case of ZSTs (empty structs).
When `break;` has a type mismatch because the `Destination` points at a tail
expression with an obligation flowing from a return type, point at the
return type.
Fix#39968.
When a formatting string contains an invalid descriptor, point at it
instead of the argument:
```
error: unknown format trait `foo`
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:86:17
|
LL | println!("{:foo}", 1);
| ^^^
|
= note: the only appropriate formatting traits are:
- ``, which uses the `Display` trait
- `?`, which uses the `Debug` trait
- `e`, which uses the `LowerExp` trait
- `E`, which uses the `UpperExp` trait
- `o`, which uses the `Octal` trait
- `p`, which uses the `Pointer` trait
- `b`, which uses the `Binary` trait
- `x`, which uses the `LowerHex` trait
- `X`, which uses the `UpperHex` trait
```
This updates the libc that the `wasm32-wasi` target links against to the
latest revision, mostly just bringing in minor bug fixes and minor wasm
size improvements.
The previous behaviour ignored slice lengths above a certain length
because it could not do otherwise. We now have VarLenSlice however, that
can represent the ignored lengths to make the algorithm more consistent.
This does not change the correctness of the algorithm, but makes it
easier to reason about.
As a nice side-effect, exhaustiveness errors have improved: they now
capture all missing lengths instead of only the shortest.
Note that where we previously ran `max_slice_len` with input having not
only matrix.heads() but also v.head(). Now we run it on matrix.heads()
only, but also take into account the currently processed constructor.
This preserves behavior since `pat_constructors` returns only one
constructor in the case that is of interest for us.
I tracked the origins of `pat_constructors` returning a `Vec` to commit
9b3f9d94441340f0cdf6ec59aab739baef0f1ac0. It was indeed specifically
for variable-length slice patterns.
This improves error messages by indicating when slices above a certain
lengths have not been matched. Previously, we would only report examples
of such lengths, but of course never all of them.
If item.span is part of a macro invocation, this has several downstream
implications. To name two that were found while working on this:
- The dead-code error gets annotated with a "in this macro invocation"
- Some errors get canceled if they refer to remote crates
Ideally, we should annotate item.ident.span with the same macro info,
but this is a larger change (see: #66095), so for now we just fall
back to the old behavior if this item was generated by a macro.
I use span.macro_backtrace().len() to detect if it's part of a macro,
because that (among other things) is what is used by the code which
adds the "in this macro invocation" annotations mentioned above.
clean highlightSourceLines code
This is the first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66046. Now that I've splitted the hashchange stuff and the source code lines highlighting, I'll be able to fix the whole issue once and for all.
r? @kinnison
Don't double-count `simd_shuffle` promotion candidates
Resolves#66016.
The `#[rustc_args_required_const]` attribute was added to `simd_shuffle*` in rust-lang/stdarch#825. This caused `promote_consts` to double-count its second argument when recording promotion candidates, which caused the promotion candidate compatibility check to fail.
Once `stdarch` is updated in-tree to include rust-lang/stdarch#825, all special logic around `simd_shuffle` can and should be removed.
Allow specifying LLVM's MCTargetOptions::ABIName in target specification files
This addresses #65024, as it allows RISC-V target specification files to set `"llvm-abiname": "lp64d"`.
Other languages (read: C) usually expose this codegen parameter under a compiler argument like `-mabi=<XYZ>`.
Improve MaybeUninit::get_{ref,mut} documentation
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63568#issuecomment-544106668, `MaybeUninit`'s `get_{ref,mut}` documentation is lacking, so this PR attempts to fix that.
That being said, and as @RalfJung mentions in that thread,
> In particular, we should clarify that all the UB rules for these methods equally apply when calling the raw ptr methods and creating a reference manually.
these other docs also need to be improved, which I can do in this PR ~~(hence the `[WIP]`)~~.
Finally, since all these documentations are related to clearly establishing when dealing with uninitialized memory which patterns are known to be sound and which patterns are currently UB (that is, until, if ever, the rules around references to unintialized integers get relaxed, this documentation will treat them as UB, and advise against such patterns (_e.g._, it is not possible to use uninitialized buffers with the `Read` API)), I think that adding even more examples to the main documentation of `MaybeUninit` inherent definition wouldn't hurt either.
___
- [Rendered](http://dreamy-ritchie-99d637.netlify.com/core/mem/union.maybeuninit#method.get_ref)
