This optimization pass previously made excessive assumptions as to the nature of
the blocks being optimized. We remove those assumptions and make sure to
rigorously justify all changes that are made to the MIR. Details can be found
in the file.
Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_transform`
Like #91580, this was inspired by the conversation in #44524 about possibly removing the feature from the compiler. This crate is a heavy `'tcx` user, so is a nice case study.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Three interesting ones:
This one had the `'tcx` declared on the function, despite the trait taking a `'tcx`:
```diff
-impl Visitor<'_> for UsedLocals {
+impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for UsedLocals {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
```
This one use in-band for one, and underscore for the other:
```diff
-pub fn remove_dead_blocks(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'_>) {
+pub fn remove_dead_blocks<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
```
A spurious name, since there's no single-use-lifetime warning:
```diff
-pub fn run_passes(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &'mir mut Body<'tcx>, passes: &[&dyn MirPass<'tcx>]) {
+pub fn run_passes<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>, passes: &[&dyn MirPass<'tcx>]) {
```
Address some FIXMEs left over from #91475
This shouldn't change behavior, only clarify what we're currently doing. I filed #91576 to see if the treatment of generator drop shims is intentional.
cc #91475
This one is a heavy `'tcx` user.
Two interesting ones:
This one had the `'tcx` declared on the function, despite the trait taking a `'tcx`:
```diff
-impl Visitor<'_> for UsedLocals {
+impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for UsedLocals {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
```
This one use in-band for one, and underscore for the other:
```diff
-pub fn remove_dead_blocks(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'_>) {
+pub fn remove_dead_blocks<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
```
Add a MIR pass manager (Taylor's Version)
The final draft of #91386 and #77665.
While the compile-time constraints in #91386 are cool, I decided on a more minimal approach for now. I want to explore phase constraints and maybe relative-ordering constraints in the future, though. This should preserve existing behavior **exactly** (please let me know if it doesn't) while making the following changes to the way we organize things today:
- Each `MirPhase` now corresponds to a single MIR pass. `run_passes` is not responsible for listing the correct MIR phase.
- `run_passes` no longer silently skips passes if the declared MIR phase is greater than or equal to the body's. This has bitten me multiple times. If you want this behavior, you can always branch on `body.phase` yourself.
- If your pass is solely to emit errors, you can use the `MirLint` interface instead, which gets a shared reference to `Body` instead of a mutable one. By differentiating the two, I hope to make it clearer in the short term where lints belong in the pipeline. In the long term perhaps we could enforce this at compile-time?
- MIR is no longer dumped for passes that aren't enabled, or for lints.
I tried to check that `-Zvalidate` still works correctly, since the MIR phase is now updated as soon as the associated pass is done, instead of at the end of all the passes in `run_passes`. However, it looks like `-Zvalidate` is broken with current nightlies anyways 😢 (it spits out a bunch of errors).
cc `@oli-obk` `@wesleywiser`
r? rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
Looks like Generator drop shims already have `post_borrowck_cleanup` run
on them. That's a bit surprising, since it means they're getting const-
and maybe borrow-checked? This merits further investigation, but for now
just preserve the status quo.
Move `#![feature(const_precise_live_drops)]` checks earlier in the pipeline
Should mitigate the issues found during MCP on #73255.
Once this is done, we should clean up the queries a bit, since I think `mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked` can be merged back into `mir_promoted`.
Fixes#90770.
cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval``
r? ``@nikomatsakis`` (since they reviewed #71824)
Instead we run `RemoveFalseEdges` and `RemoveUninitDrops` at the
appropriate time. The extra `SimplifyCfg` avoids visiting unreachable
blocks during `RemoveUninitDrops`.
Otherwise dataflow state will propagate along false edges and cause
things to be marked as maybe init unnecessarily. These should be
separate, since `SimplifyBranches` also makes `if true {} else {}` into
a `goto`, which means we wouldn't lint anything in the `else` block.
Remove hir::map::blocks and use FnKind instead
The principal tool is `FnLikeNode`, which is not often used and can be easily implemented using `rustc_hir::intravisit::FnKind`.
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
Index and hash HIR as part of lowering
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88186
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88880 (see merge commit).~
Once HIR is lowered, it is later indexed by the `index_hir` query and hashed for `crate_hash`. This PR moves those post-processing steps to lowering itself. As a side objective, the HIR crate data structure is refactored as an `IndexVec<LocalDefId, Option<OwnerInfo<'hir>>>` where `OwnerInfo` stores all the relevant information for an HIR owner.
r? `@michaelwoerister`
cc `@petrochenkov`
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
