Update annotate-snippets-rs to 0.8.0
#59346
I made major changes to this library. In the previous version we worked with owned while in the current one with borrowed.
I have adapted it without changing the behavior.
I have modified the coverage since the previous one did not return correctly the index of the character in the line.
Recursively expand `TokenKind::Interpolated` in `probably_equal_for_proc_macro`
Fixes#68430
When comparing the captured and re-parsed `TokenStream` for a `TokenKind::Interpolated`, we currently treat any nested `TokenKind::Interpolated` tokens as unequal. If a `TokenKind::Interpolated` token shows up in the captured `TokenStream` due to a `macro_rules!` expansion, we will throw away the captured `TokenStream`, losing span information.
This PR recursively invokes `nt_to_tokenstream` on nested `TokenKind::Interpolated` tokens, effectively flattening the stream into a sequence of non-interpolated tokens. This allows it to compare equal with the re-parsed stream, allowing us to keep the original captured `TokenStream` (with span information).
This requires all of the `probably_equal_for_proc_macro` methods to be moved from `librustc_ast` to `librustc_parse` so that they can call `nt_to_tokenstream`.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #71289 (Allow using `Self::` in doc)
- #72375 (Improve E0599 explanation)
- #72385 (Add some teams to prioritization exclude_labels)
- #72395 (Allow rust-highfive to label issues it creates.)
- #72453 (Add flag to open docs: x.py doc --open)
- #72459 (Add core::future::IntoFuture)
- #72461 (Clean up E0600 explanation)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Update cargo
9 commits in cb06cb2696df2567ce06d1a39b1b40612a29f853..500b2bd01c958f5a33b6aa3f080bea015877b83c
2020-05-08 21:57:44 +0000 to 2020-05-18 17:12:54 +0000
- Handle LTO with an rlib/cdylib crate type (rust-lang/cargo#8254)
- Gracefully handle errors during a build. (rust-lang/cargo#8247)
- Update `im-rc` to 15.0.0 (rust-lang/cargo#8255)
- Fix `cargo update` with unused patch. (rust-lang/cargo#8243)
- Rephrased error message for disallowed sections in virtual workspace (rust-lang/cargo#8200)
- Ignore broken console output in some situations. (rust-lang/cargo#8236)
- Expand error message to explain that a string was found (rust-lang/cargo#8235)
- Add context to some fs errors. (rust-lang/cargo#8232)
- Move SipHasher to an isolated module. (rust-lang/cargo#8233)
update stacker to 0.1.9 to unbreak build on OpenBSD
the version 0.1.8 of stacker (what is currently pinned in Cargo.lock) doesn't build on OpenBSD (see https://github.com/rust-lang/stacker/pull/34).
update the version to 0.1.9
Prevent compiler stack overflow for deeply recursive code
I was unable to write a test that
1. runs in under 1s
2. overflows on my machine without this patch
The following reproduces the issue, but I don't think it's sensible to include a test that takes 30s to compile. We can now easily squash newly appearing overflows by the strategic insertion of calls to `ensure_sufficient_stack`.
```rust
// compile-pass
#![recursion_limit="1000000"]
macro_rules! chain {
(EE $e:expr) => {$e.sin()};
(RECURSE $i:ident $e:expr) => {chain!($i chain!($i chain!($i chain!($i $e))))};
(Z $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE EE $e)};
(Y $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE Z $e)};
(X $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE Y $e)};
(A $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE X $e)};
(B $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE A $e)};
(C $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE B $e)};
// causes overflow on x86_64 linux
// less than 1 second until overflow on test machine
// after overflow has been fixed, takes 30s to compile :/
(D $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE C $e)};
(E $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE D $e)};
(F $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE E $e)};
// more than 10 seconds
(G $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE F $e)};
(H $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE G $e)};
(I $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE H $e)};
(J $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE I $e)};
(K $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE J $e)};
(L $e:expr) => {chain!(RECURSE L $e)};
}
fn main() {
let x = chain!(D 42.0_f32);
}
```
fixes#55471fixes#41884fixes#40161fixes#34844fixes#32594
cc @alexcrichton @rust-lang/compiler
I looked at all code that checks the recursion limit and inserted stack growth calls where appropriate.
