extend `box-default` lint, add suggestion
This extends the recently added `box-default` lint to also cover `Box::new(vec![])`, `Box::new(String::from(""))` and `Box::new(Vec::from([]))`. Also the lint now suggests a suitable replacement. I did not find a simple way to check whether the type is fully determined by the outside, so I at least checked for some variations to remove the turbofish in those cases.
---
changelog: none
lint::unsafe_removed_from_name: fix false positive result when allowed
changelog: [`unsafe_removed_from_name`] Fix allowing on imports produces a false positive on `useless_attribute`.
Fixes: #9197
Signed-off-by: Andy-Python-Programmer <andypythonappdeveloper@gmail.com>
FormatArgsExpn: Find comma spans and ignore weird proc macro spans
Fixes the following cases:
A missing `, 1` from the `expect_fun_call` suggestion:
```rust
Some(()).expect(&format!("{x} {}", 1));
```
```
warning: use of `expect` followed by a function call
--> t.rs:7:14
|
7 | Some(()).expect(&format!("{x} {}", 1));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("{x} {}"))`
```
The suggestion removing from the comma in the comment rather than the one after the format string:
```rust
println!(
"{}",
// a comment, with a comma in it
x
);
```
```
warning: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> t.rs:9:5
|
9 | / println!(
10 | | "{}",
11 | | // a comment, with a comma in it
12 | | x
13 | | );
| |_____^
|
help: change this to
|
10 ~ "{x}",
11 ~ // a comment
|
```
It also no longer accepts expansions where a format string or argument has a "weird" proc macro span, that is one where the literal/expression it outputs has the span of one of its inputs. Kind of like a `format_args` specific `clippy_utils::is_from_proc_macro`, e.g. `format!(indoc! {" ... "})`
changelog: [`expect_fun_call`]: Fix suggestion for `format!` using captured variables
changelog: [`print_literal`], [`write_literal`], [`uninlined_format_args`]: Fix suggestion when following a comment including a comma
Fix and improve `match_type_on_diagnostic_item`
This extracts the fix for the lint out of #7647. There's still a couple of other functions to check, but at least this will get lint working again.
The two added util functions (`is_diagnostic_item` and `is_lang_item`) are needed to handle `DefId` for unit and tuple struct/variant constructors. The `rustc_diagnostic_item` and `lang` attributes are attached to the struct/variant `DefId`, but most of the time they are used through their constructors which have a different `DefId`. The two utility functions will check if the `DefId` is for a constructor and switch to the associated struct/variant `DefId`.
There does seem to be a bug on rustc's side where constructor `DefId`s from external crates seem to be returning `DefKind::Variant` instead of `DefKind::Ctor()`. There's a workaround put in right.
changelog: None
Remove unused `.fixed` files, only run asm_syntax doctests on x86
Two small changes, removes some unused `.fixed` and makes `clippy_lints` doctests pass on non x86 arches
changelog: none
* Check for `const`s and `static`s from external crates
* Check for `LangItem`s
* Handle inherent functions which have the same name as a field
* Also check the following functions:
* `match_trait_method`
* `match_def_path`
* `is_expr_path_def_path`
* `is_qpath_def_path`
* Handle checking for a constructor to a diagnostic item or `LangItem`
let unnecessary_cast work for trivial non_literal expressions
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
---
changelog: [`unnecessary_cast`]: fix for trivial non_literal expressions
Fixes#9562
[`unnecessary_cast`] add parenthesis when negative number uses a method
fix#9563
The issue was probably introduced by 90fe3bea52
changelog: [`unnecessary_cast`] add parenthesis when negative number uses a method
r? llogiq
use `is_integer_literal` more
I noticed that we have the `is_integer_literal` function in our `clippy_utils`, yet almost everywhere people still match int literal expressions manually. So I searched for instances to replace and shorten the code a bit.
---
changelog: none
Implement `manual_clamp` lint
Fixes#9477Fixes#6751
Identifies common patterns where usage of the `clamp` function would be more succinct and clear, and suggests using the `clamp` function instead.
changelog: [`manual_clamp`]: Implement manual_clamp lint
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom
So, uhhhhh
r? `@estebank`
## User-facing change
"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
- = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+ = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```
Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.
## Developer-facing change
`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.
Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`
The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.
Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.
## Subtle problem
By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.
## P.S.
I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
