Fix suggestions for missing return type lifetime specifiers
This pull request aims to fix#84592. The issue is that the current code seems to assume that there is only a single relevant span pointing to the missing lifetime, and only looks at the first one:
e5f83d24ae/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late/lifetimes.rs (L2959)
This is incorrect, though, and leads to incorrect error messages and invalid suggestions. For instance, the example from #84592:
```rust
struct TwoLifetimes<'x, 'y> {
x: &'x (),
y: &'y (),
}
fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
TwoLifetimes { x: &(), y: &() }
}
```
currently leads to:
```
error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
--> src/main.rs:6:57
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
| --- --- ^^ expected 2 lifetime parameters
|
= help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_<'a, 'a>, '_> {
| ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
```
There are two problems:
- The error message is wrong. There is only _one_ lifetime parameter expected at the location pointed to by the error message (and another one at a separate location).
- The suggestion is incorrect and will not lead to correct code.
With the changes in this PR, I get the following output:
```
error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
--> p.rs:6:57
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
| --- --- ^^ ^^ expected named lifetime parameter
| |
| expected named lifetime parameter
|
= help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'a, 'a> {
| ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^ ^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0106`.
```
Mainly, I changed `add_missing_lifetime_specifiers_label()` to receive a _vector_ of spans (and counts) instead of just one, and adjusted its body accordingly.
rustc_session: Move more option building code from the `options!` macro
The moved code doesn't need to be generated by a macro, it can use a regular (generic) function and type aliases instead.
(The refactoring is salvaged from a branch with different now abandoned work.)
Add primary marker on codegen unit and generate main wrapper on primary codegen.
This is the codegen part of changes extracted from #84062.
This add a marker called `primary` on each codegen units, where exactly one codegen unit will be `primary = true` at a time. This specific codegen unit will take charge of generating `main` wrapper when `main` is imported from a foreign crate after the implementation of RFC 1260.
cc #28937
I'm not sure who should i ask for review for codegen changes, so feel free to reassign.
r? `@nagisa`
Add default search path to `Target::search()`
The function `Target::search()` accepts a target triple and returns a `Target` struct defining the requested target.
There is a `// FIXME 16351: add a sane default search path?` comment that indicates it is desirable to include some sort of default. This was raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/16351 which was closed without any resolution.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31117 was proposed, however that has platform-specific logic that is unsuitable for systems without `/etc/`.
This patch implements the suggestion raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/16351#issuecomment-180878193 where a `target.json` file may be placed in `$(rustc --print sysroot)/lib/rustlib/<target-triple>/target.json`. This allows shipping a toolchain distribution as a single file that gets extracted to the sysroot.
Improve support for NewPM
This adds various missing bits of support for NewPM and allows us to successfully run stage 2 tests with NewPM enabled.
This does not yet enable NewPM by default, as there are still known issue on LLVM 12 (such as a weak fat LTO pipeline). The plan is to make the switch after we update to LLVM 13.
This doesn't seem to be necessary anymore, although I don't know
at which point or why that changed.
Forcing -O1 makes some tests fail under NewPM, because NewPM also
performs inlining at -O1, so it ends up performing much more
optimization in practice than before.
Remove SpanInterner::get
- It's used exactly once, so it's trivial to replace
- It doesn't match the normal convention for containers: normally
`get()` returns an option and indexing panics. Instead `SpanInterner::get()` panics
and there's no indexing operation available.
Improve diagnostics for functions in `struct` definitions
Tries to implement #76421.
This is probably going to need unit tests, but I wanted to hear from review all the cases tests should cover.
I'd like to follow up with the "mechanically applicable suggestion here that adds an impl block" step, but I'd need guidance. My idea for now would be to try to parse a function, and if that succeeds, create a dummy `ast::Item` impl block to then format it using `pprust`. Would that be a viable approach? Is there a better alternative?
r? `@matklad` cc `@estebank`
rustc: Support Rust-specific features in -Ctarget-feature
Since the beginning of time the `-Ctarget-feature` flag on the command
line has largely been passed unmodified to LLVM. Afterwards, though, the
`#[target_feature]` attribute was stabilized and some of the names in
this attribute do not match the corresponding LLVM name. This is because
Rust doesn't always want to stabilize the exact feature name in LLVM for
the equivalent functionality in Rust. This creates a situation, however,
where in Rust you'd write:
#[target_feature(enable = "pclmulqdq")]
unsafe fn foo() {
// ...
}
but on the command line you would write:
RUSTFLAGS="-Ctarget-feature=+pclmul" cargo build --release
This difference is somewhat odd to deal with if you're a newcomer and
the situation may be made worse with upcoming features like [WebAssembly
SIMD](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74372) which may be more
prevalent.
This commit implements a mapping to translate requests via
`-Ctarget-feature` through the same name-mapping functionality that's
present for attributes in Rust going to LLVM. This means that
`+pclmulqdq` will work on x86 targets where as previously it did not.
I've attempted to keep this backwards-compatible where the compiler will
just opportunistically attempt to remap features found in
`-Ctarget-feature`, but if there's something it doesn't understand it
gets passed unmodified to LLVM just as it was before.
rename LLVM target for RustyHermit
- RustyHermit is a library operating system, where the user-
and the kernel-space use the same target
- by a mistake a previous patch changes the target to an incorect value
- this merge request revert the previous changes
Unify rustc and rustdoc parsing of `cfg()`
This extracts a new `parse_cfg` function that's used between both.
- Treat `#[doc(cfg(x), cfg(y))]` the same as `#[doc(cfg(x)]
#[doc(cfg(y))]`. Previously it would be completely ignored.
- Treat `#[doc(inline, cfg(x))]` the same as `#[doc(inline)]
#[doc(cfg(x))]`. Previously, the cfg would be ignored.
- Pass the cfg predicate through to rustc_expand to be validated
Technically this is a breaking change, but doc_cfg is still nightly so I don't think it matters.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84437.
r? `````````@petrochenkov`````````
illumos should put libc last in library search order
Under some conditions, the toolchain will produce a sequence of linker
arguments that result in a NEEDED list that puts libc before libgcc_s;
e.g.,
[0] NEEDED 0x2046ba libc.so.1
[1] NEEDED 0x204723 libm.so.2
[2] NEEDED 0x204736 libsocket.so.1
[3] NEEDED 0x20478b libumem.so.1
[4] NEEDED 0x204763 libgcc_s.so.1
Both libc and libgcc_s provide an unwinder implementation, but libgcc_s
provides some extra symbols upon which Rust directly depends. If libc
is first in the NEEDED list we will find some of those symbols in libc
but others in libgcc_s, resulting in undefined behaviour as the two
implementations do not use compatible interior data structures.
This solution is not perfect, but is the simplest way to produce correct
binaries on illumos for now.
