As outlined in
https://aturon.github.io/style/naming/conversions.html
`to_` functions names should only be used for expensive operations.
Thus `to_option` is better named `as_option`. Also, putting type
names into method names is considered bad style; what the user is
really trying to get is a reference. This `as_ref` is even better.
Also, we are missing a mutable version of this method. So add a
new trait `RawMutPtr` with a corresponding `as_mut` methode.
Finally, there is a bug in the signature of `to_option` which has
been around since lifetime elision: originally the returned reference
had 'static lifetime, but since the elision changes this become
the lifetime of the raw pointer (which does not make sense, since
the pointer lifetime and referent lifetime are unrelated). Fix
the bug to return a reference with a fresh lifetime (which will
be inferred from the calling context).
[breaking-change]
It was previously asserted that each thread received at least one connection,
but this is not guaranteed to always be the case due to scheduling. This test
also deadlocked on failure due to a lingering reference to the sending half of
the channel, so that reference is now also eagerly dropped so the test can fail
properly if something bad happens.
Closes#16872
It was previously asserted that each thread received at least one connection,
but this is not guaranteed to always be the case due to scheduling. This test
also deadlocked on failure due to a lingering reference to the sending half of
the channel, so that reference is now also eagerly dropped so the test can fail
properly if something bad happens.
Closes#16872
This changes the `Add` and `Sub` implementations for `Timespec` introduced in #16573 to use `Duration` as the time span type instead of `Timespec` itself, as [suggested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/16573#issuecomment-52593408) by @sfackler.
This depends on #16626, because is uses `Duration::seconds(i64)`, whereas currently `Duration::seconds` takes an `i32`.
They were only correct in the simplest case. Some of the optimisations
are certainly possible but should be introduced carefully and only
when the whole pattern codegen infrastructure is in a better shape.
Fixes#16648.
Different Identifiers and Names can have identical textual representations, but different internal representations, due to the macro hygiene machinery (syntax contexts and gensyms). This provides a way to see these internals by compiling with `--pretty expanded,hygiene`.
This is useful for debugging & hacking on macros (e.g. diagnosing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15750/https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15962 likely would've been faster with this functionality).
E.g.
```rust
#![feature(macro_rules)]
// minimal junk
#![no_std]
macro_rules! foo {
($x: ident) => { y + $x }
}
fn bar() {
foo!(x)
}
```
```rust
#![feature(macro_rules)]
// minimal junk
#![no_std]
fn bar /* 61#0 */() { y /* 60#2 */ + x /* 58#3 */ }
```
Fixes#12643
> Say!
> I like labelled breaks/continues!
I will use them with a `for` loop.
And I will use with a `loop` loop.
Say! I will use them ANYWHERE!
… _even_ in a `while` loop.
Because they're now supported there.
`--pretty expanded,hygiene` is helpful with debugging macro issues,
since two identifiers/names can be textually the same, but different
internally (resulting in weird "undefined variable" errors).
