Support lint tool names in rustc command line options
When rustc is running without a lint tool such as clippy enabled, options for lints such as `clippy::foo` are meant to be ignored. This was already working for those specified by attrs, such as `#![allow(clippy::foo)]`, but this did not work for command line arguments like `-A clippy::foo`. This PR fixes that issue.
Note that we discovered this issue while discussing https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5034.
Fixes#86628.
This change merges `check_lint_and_tool_name` into `check_lint_name` in
order to avoid having two very similar functions.
Also adds the `.stderr` file back for the test case, since apparently
it is still needed.
Only include lint in future_incompatible lint group if not an edition lint
A follow up to #86330 - this only includes lints annotated with `FutureIncompatibleInfo` in the `future_incompatibile` lint group if the future compatibility is not tied to an edition.
We probably want to rename `FutureIncompatibleInfo` to something else since this type is now used to indicate future breakages of all kinds (even those that happen in editions). I'd prefer to do that in a separate PR though.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Don't make `rustc_insignificant_dtor` feature gate
This isn't a feature gate, it's an attribute that is feature gated behind the `rustc_attrs` attribute. Closes#85680.
Turn non_fmt_panic into a future_incompatible edition lint.
This turns the `non_fmt_panic` lint into a future_incompatible edition lint, so it becomes part of the `rust_2021_compatibility` group. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85894.
This lint produces both warnings about semantical changes (e.g. `panic!("{{")`) and things that will become hard errors (e.g. `panic!("{")`). So I added a `explain_reason: false` that supresses the default "this will become a hard error" or "the semantics will change" message, and instead added a note depending on the situation. (cc `@rylev)`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This prevents mistakes where the feature is in the list of incomplete
features but not actually a feature by making the incompleteness a part
of the declaration.
Reserve prefixed identifiers and literals (RFC 3101)
This PR denies any identifiers immediately followed by one of three tokens `"`, `'` or `#`, which is stricter than the requirements of RFC 3101 but may be necessary according to the discussion at [Zulip].
[Zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/268952-edition-2021/topic/reserved.20prefixes/near/238470099
The tracking issue #84599 says we'll add a feature gate named `reserved_prefixes`, but I don't think I can do this because it is impossible for the lexer to know whether a feature is enabled or not. I guess determining the behavior by the edition information should be enough.
Fixes#84599
Remove `doc(include)`
This nightly feature is redundant now that `extended_key_value_attributes` is stable (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83366). `@rust-lang/rustdoc` not sure if you think this needs FCP; there was already an FCP in #82539, but technically it was for deprecating, not removing the feature altogether.
This should not be merged before #83366.
cc `@petrochenkov`
Support for force-warns
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85512.
This PR adds a new command line option `force-warns` which will force the provided lints to warn even if they are allowed by some other mechanism such as `#![allow(warnings)]`.
Some remaining issues:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85512 mentions that `force-warns` should also be capable of taking lint groups instead of individual lints. This is not implemented.
* If a lint has a higher warning level than `warn`, this will cause that lint to warn instead. We probably want to allow the lint to error if it is set to a higher lint and is not allowed somewhere else.
* One test is currently ignored because it's not working - when a deny-by-default lint is allowed, it does not currently warn under `force-warns`. I'm not sure why, but I wanted to get this in before the weekend.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Remove unused feature gates
The first commit removes a usage of a feature gate, but I don't expect it to be controversial as the feature gate was only used to workaround a limitation of rust in the past. (closures never being `Clone`)
The second commit uses `#[allow_internal_unstable]` to avoid leaking the `trusted_step` feature gate usage from inside the index newtype macro. It didn't work for the `min_specialization` feature gate though.
The third commit removes (almost) all feature gates from the compiler that weren't used anyway.
Use pattern matching instead of checking lengths explicitly
This piece of code checks that there are exaclty two variants, one having
exactly one field, the other having exactly zero fields. If any of these
conditions is violated, it returns `None`. Otherwise it assigns that one
field's ty to `field_ty`.
Instead of fiddling with indices and length checks explicitly, use pattern
matching to simplify this.
`@rustbot` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
This piece of code checks that there are exaclty two variants, one having
exactly one field, the other having exactly zero fields. If any of these
conditions is violated, it returns `None`. Otherwise it assigns that one
field's ty to `field_ty`.
Instead of fiddling with indices and length checks explicitly, use pattern
matching to simplify this.
