Fix cargo handle logging in flycheck
This PR has two commits, so it's probably easier to review them separately:
(1) Rename `CargoHandle` to `CommandHandle`, as the command may not be a cargo command.
(2) Logging should format the current command, rather than calling `check_command()` again. This ensures that any later configuration changes don't cause us to log incorrect information.
proc-macro-test: Pass target to cargo invocation
When cross compiling macos → dragonfly the dist build fails in the proc-maro-test-impl crate with the following error:
`ld: unknown option: -z\nclang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)`
This appears to be a wart stemming from using an Apple host for cross compiling. Passing the target along to cargo allows it to pick up a linker that it understands and DTRT.
SCIP: Report the correct version of rust-analyzer in the metadata
Previously this was hard coded to "0.1". The SCIP protocol allows this to be an arbitrary string:
```
message ToolInfo {
// Name of the indexer that produced this index.
string name = 1;
// Version of the indexer that produced this index.
string version = 2;
// Command-line arguments that were used to invoke this indexer.
repeated string arguments = 3;
}
```
so use the same string reported by `rust-analyzer --version`.
Previously this was hard coded to "0.1". The SCIP protocol allows this
to be an arbitrary string:
```
message ToolInfo {
// Name of the indexer that produced this index.
string name = 1;
// Version of the indexer that produced this index.
string version = 2;
// Command-line arguments that were used to invoke this indexer.
repeated string arguments = 3;
}
```
so use the same string reported by `rust-analyzer --version`.
Warn on elided lifetimes in associated constants (`ELIDED_LIFETIMES_IN_ASSOCIATED_CONSTANT`)
Elided lifetimes in associated constants (in impls) erroneously resolve to fresh lifetime parameters on the impl since #97313. This is not correct behavior (see #38831).
I originally opened #114716 to fix this, but given the time that has passed, the crater results seem pretty bad: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114716#issuecomment-1682091952
This PR alternatively implements a lint against this behavior, and I'm hoping to bump this to deny in a few versions.
internal: unpin serde
Serde no longer uses blobs as of
https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/pull/2590
As such, there's no longer need for us to pin it.
Note that this doesn't upgrade serde version we use: I am fairly confident that the blobs are already there are fine, and now I am fairly confident that all future versions of serde will be fine as well.
Sered no longer uses blobs as of
https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/pull/2590
As such, there's no longer need for us to pin it.
Note that this doesn't upgrade serde version we use: I am fairly
confident that the blobs are already there are fine, and now I am fairly
confident that all future versions of serde will be fine as well.
fix help text for rust-analyzer.check.invocation{Strategy,Location}
I highly doubt that `check.invocationLocation` only has an effect if `cargo.buildScripts.overrideCommand` is set -- looks like a copy-paste mistake from `buildScripts.invocationLocation` to me.
feat: Implement extern crate completion
Hi, this is a draft PR for #13002.
I have basic completion working as well as a filter for existing extern crate imports in the same file. This is based on the tests, I have not actually tried this in an editor. Before going further I think this is a good point to stop and get feedback on the
structure and approach I have taken so far. Let me know what you think :)
I will make sure to add more tests, rebase commits and align with the code style guidelines before submitting a final version.
A few specific questions :
1. Is there a better way to check for matching suggestions? right now I just test if an extern crate name starts with the current
user input.
2. Am I creating the `CompletionItem` correctly? I noticed that `use_.rs` invokes a builder where as I do not.
3. When checking for existing extern crate imports the current implementation only looks at the current source file, is that sufficient?
fix: avoid problematic serde release
serde 1.0.172 and up rely on opaque non-reproducible binary blobs to function, explicitly not providing a library-level opt-out.
This is problematic for two reasons:
- directly, unauditable binary blobs are a security issue.
- indirectly, it becomes much harder to predict future behaviors of the crate.
As such, I am willing to go on a limb here and forbid building rust-analyzer with those versions of serde. Normally, my philosophy is to defer the choice to the end user, but it's also a design constraint of rust-analyzer that we don't run random binaries downloaded from the internet without explicit user's concent.
Concretely, this upper-bounds serde for both rust-analyzer workspace, as well as the lsp-server lib.
See https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2538 for wider context.
serde 1.0.172 and up rely on opaque non-reproducible binary blobs to
function, explicitly not providing a library-level opt-out.
This is problematic for two reasons:
- directly, unauditable binary blobs are a security issue.
- indirectly, it becomes much harder to predict future behaviors of the
crate.
As such, I am willing to go on a limb here and forbid building
rust-analyzer with those versions of serde. Normally, my philosophy is
to defer the choice to the end user, but it's also a design constraint
of rust-analyzer that we don't run random binaries downloaded from the
internet without explicit user's concent.
Concretely, this upper-bounds serde for both rust-analyzer workspace, as
well as the lsp-server lib.
See https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2538 for wider context.
minor : Deunwrap generate_derive
#15398 subtask 1. Since the editing closure has arms, I did something *experimental* ( in this case just a clever term for bad code ) to bypass creating an `Option` but I am ready to change this.
internal: Record import origins in ItemScope and PerNS
This records the import items definitions come from in the module scope (as well as what an import resolves to in an ItemScope). It does ignore glob imports as thats a lot more work for little to no gain, glob imports act as if the importing items are "inlined" into the scope which suffices for almost all use cases I believe (to my knowledge, attributes on them have little effect).
There is still a lot of work needed to make this available to the IDE layer, but this lays out the ground work for havin IDE layer support.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14079
