proc_macro/bridge: send diagnostics over the bridge as a struct
This removes some RPC when creating and emitting diagnostics, and
simplifies the bridge slightly.
After this change, there are no remaining methods which take advantage
of the support for `&mut` references to objects in the store as
arguments, meaning that support for them could technically be removed if
we wanted. The only remaining uses of immutable references into the
store are `TokenStream` and `SourceFile`.
r? `@eddyb`
lint: avoid linting diag functions with diag lints
Functions annotated with `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` are used by the diagnostic migration lints to know when to lint, but functions that are annotated with this attribute shouldn't themselves be linted.
cc #100717https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101041#discussion_r959303706
Link “? operator” to relevant chapter in The Book
Before, the text simply asked people to use a symbol which is hard to
search for. Now the text links back to the chapter on error
propagation in The Book. That should help people find the relevant
keywords for further searches.
Fix uintended diagnostic caused by `drain(..)`
Calling `drain(..)` makes later `suggestable_variants.is_empty()` always true, which makes the diagnostics unintended.
migrate rustc_query_system to use SessionDiagnostic
issues:
* variable list is not supported in fluent
* ~~cannot have two sub diagnostic with the same tag (eg. 2 .note or 2 .help)~~
allow multiple tag with SessionSubdiagnostic derive
- ... when creating diagnostics in rustc_metadata
- use the error_code! macro
- pass macro output to diag.code()
- use fluent from within manual implementation of SessionDiagnostic
- emit the untested errors in case they occur in the wild
- stop panicking in the probably-not-dead code, add fixme to write test
Functions annotated with `#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` are used by the
diagnostic migration lints to know when to lint, but functions that are
annotated with this attribute shouldn't themselves be linted.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Use in-page links for sanitizer docs.
This updates the sanitizer documentation page so that the links in the summary at the top jump to the relevant sections within the page instead of leading away to a different site. I think this makes it a little easier to navigate this page which has gotten quite long.
This also fixes the broken link for MemTagSanitizer which was not defined. It also adds MemTagSanitizer to the external summary list at the bottom of the page.
translations(rustc_session): migrates `rustc_session` to use `SessionDiagnostic` - Pt. 1
## Description
This is the first PR for the migration of the module `rustc_session`. You can follow my progress [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100717#issuecomment-1220279883).
The PR migrates the files `cgu_reuse_tracker` and `parse.rs` to use `SessionDiagnostic `.
Migrate rustc_monomorphize to use SessionDiagnostic
### Description
- Migrates diagnostics in `rustc_monomorphize` to use `SessionDiagnostic`
- Adds an `impl IntoDiagnosticArg for PathBuf`
### TODO / Help!
- [x] I'm having trouble figuring out how to apply an optional note. 😕 Help!?
- Resolved. It was bad docs. Fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1437/files
- [x] `errors:RecursionLimit` should be `#[fatal ...]`, but that doesn't exist so it's `#[error ...]` at the moment.
- Maybe I can switch after this is merged in? --> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100694
- Or maybe I need to manually implement `SessionDiagnostic` instead of deriving it?
- [x] How does one go about converting an error inside of [a call to struct_span_lint_hir](8064a49508/compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/collector.rs (L917-L927))?
- [x] ~What placeholder do you use in the fluent template to refer to the value in a vector? It seems like [this code](0b79f758c9/compiler/rustc_macros/src/diagnostics/diagnostic_builder.rs (L83-L114)) ought to have the answer (or something near it)...but I can't figure it out.~ You can't. Punted.
