Fix `redundant_clone` fp
fixes: #5973fixes: #5595fixes: #6998
changelog: Fix `redundant_clone` fp where the cloned value is modified while the clone is in use.
Internal `if_chain!` lints
changelog: none
We use `if_chain!` a lot. So this enforces some style rules around it, internal only.
Lints when...
* Nested `if`/`if_chain!` can be collapsed
* An `if_chain!` starts with `let` or ends with `let ..; then {..}`
* An `if_chain!` has only one `if`
* An `if_chain!` contains `if .. && ..;` that spans multiple lines
lintcheck: warn if we get a bad exit status while running clippy
Right now we won't notice if a crate fails to build.
Print a warning message to indicate that there is a problem of some sort.
I'll still have to do more investigation on why this actually happens.
I suspect that the problem is that `clippy fix` might run --all-targets but when we download the crate source from crates.io, some path deps (used for internal tests etc...) are not available (which is usually not a problem because the internal tests are not needed when using the crate as a lib..?)
changelog: none
Destructure args in `methods`
changelog: none
This changes the main pattern in `methods` to match and destructure the method call args at the same time as the method name, and pass individual arg `Expr`s to the lint impls.
```rust
// before
["expect", ..] => expect::check(cx, expr, arg_lists[0]);
// after
("expect", [arg]) => expect::check(cx, expr, recv, arg);
```
This makes the code safer since there is no risk of out of bounds `args[n]` everywhere. There will be no more collecting `method_names`, `arg_lists`, `method_spans` as a separate step - everything comes out of the `match`es. Chained methods are parsed in a nested `match`. This makes the code more verbose in some ways, but IMO it is much easier to follow.
~Definitely should wait for #6896. Just putting out the idea.~
Lint: filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
Fixes#6061
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog:
* add new lint for filter(Option::is_some).map(Option::unwrap)
First Rust PR, so I'm sure I've violated some idioms. Happy to change anything.
I'm getting one test failure locally -- a stderr diff for `compile_test`. I'm having a hard time seeing how I could be causing it, so I'm tentatively opening this in the hopes that it's an artifact of my local setup against `rustc`. Hoping it can at least still be reviewed in the meantime.
I'm gathering that since this is a method lint, and `.filter(...).map(...)` is already checked, the means of implementation needs to be a little different, so I didn't exactly follow the setup boilerplate. My way of checking for method calls seems a little too direct (ie, "is the second element of the expression literally the path for `Option::is_some`?"), but it seems like that's how some other lints work, so I went with it. I'm assuming we're not concerned about, eg, closures that just end up equivalent to `Option::is_some` by eta reduction.
