* Replace variables inside | patterns in the if let: let v = if let V::A(v) | V::B(v) = v { v } else ...
* Support nested patterns: let v = if let Ok(Ok(Ok(v))) = v { v } else ...
* Support tuple structs with more than one arg: let v = V::W(v, _) = v { v } else ...
* Correctly handle .. in tuple struct patterns: let v = V::X(v, ..) = v { v } else ...
manual_let_else: do not suggest semantically different replacements
The problem is that this lint does not consider the possibility that the divergent branch can come first and that the patterns may overlap. This led to incorrect suggestions, previously registered as correct in the tests themselves:
```rust
let v = match build_enum() {
_ => continue,
Variant::Bar(v) | Variant::Baz(v) => v,
};
```
had a `let Variant::Bar(v) | Variant::Baz(v) = v else { continue; }` suggestion, which is obviously wrong as the original code `continue`s in any case. Issue #10241 gives another example.
The code now checks that the divergent branch comes second. It could be extended later (I've added a TODO) to check for non-overlapping patterns.
Fixes#10241.
changelog: [`manual_let_else`] do not suggest non equivalent replacements in `match`
Sometimes type annotations are needed for type inferrence to work,
or because of coercions. We don't know this, and we also don't
want users to possibly repeat the entire pattern.
