Commit Graph

1513 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Obei Sideg
1383f0e9af Make the trait bound is not satisfied specify kind 2022-08-29 16:53:36 +03:00
bors
b96fa1a25c Auto merge of #98626 - oli-obk:tracing, r=lcnr
bump tracing version

Bump tracing dependency to 0.1.35 to give us features like printing the return value of functions
2022-08-29 11:13:42 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
26c86c6993
Rollup merge of #100437 - compiler-errors:better-const-mismatch-err, r=oli-obk
Improve const mismatch `FulfillmentError`

Fixes #100414
2022-08-29 06:34:44 +02:00
bors
ce36e88256 Auto merge of #100497 - kadiwa4:remove_clone_into_iter, r=cjgillot
Avoid cloning a collection only to iterate over it

`@rustbot` label: +C-cleanup
2022-08-28 18:31:08 +00:00
bors
3b3f3b72c5 Auto merge of #100989 - lcnr:implied-bounds-uwu, r=spastorino
no unnormalized types for implied bounds outside borrowck

fixes #100910 - introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100676 - by only considering normalized types for wf.

r? types
2022-08-27 11:37:06 +00:00
ouz-a
36faf8fc7e Don't catch overflow when running with cargo doc 2022-08-26 21:02:35 +03:00
bors
983f4daddf Auto merge of #100705 - compiler-errors:issue-100620, r=oli-obk
Avoid reporting overflow in `is_impossible_method`

Fixes #100620

We're evaluating a new predicate in a different param-env than it was checked during typeck, so be more careful about handling overflow errors. Instead of using `FulfillmentCtxt`, using `InferCtxt::evaluate_obligation` by itself will give us back the overflow error, so we can throw it away properly.

This may give us more false-positives, but it doesn't regress the `<HashMap as Iterator>::rev` example that originally motivated adding `is_impossible_method` in the first place.
2022-08-26 06:05:06 +00:00
Michael Goulet
cfd47afa19 Erase late bound regions before comparing types in suggest_dereferences 2022-08-26 04:42:36 +00:00
Michael Goulet
e5602cb2a0 Add and use ObligationCtxt::new_in_snapshot 2022-08-26 00:10:38 +00:00
Michael Goulet
e69cad449a Use real inference variable in build_fn_sig_ty 2022-08-25 23:32:46 +00:00
Michael Goulet
c655d4b233 Don't create an extra infcx in report_closure_arg_mismatch 2022-08-25 23:32:46 +00:00
lcnr
ef7bda3b62 no unnormalized types for implied bounds 2022-08-25 11:12:04 +02:00
Yuki Okushi
f4550a6edf
Rollup merge of #99332 - jyn514:stabilize-label-break-value, r=petrochenkov
Stabilize `#![feature(label_break_value)]`

See the stabilization report in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1186213313.
2022-08-25 08:50:54 +09:00
Michael Goulet
8189a4536b Use ExprItemObligation and ExprBindingObligation too 2022-08-24 17:53:35 +00:00
Michael Goulet
4ff587263e Note binding obligation causes for const equate errors 2022-08-24 17:53:35 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
0fcabec620
Rollup merge of #100888 - spastorino:coherence-negative-impls-implied-bounds, r=lcnr
Coherence negative impls implied bounds

Fixes #93875

This PR is rebased on top of #100789 and it would need to include that one which is already r+ed.

r? ``@nikomatsakis``

cc ``@lcnr`` (which I've talked about 3222f420d9, I guess after you finish your reordering of modules and work with OutlivesEnvironmentEnv this commit can just be reverted).
2022-08-24 18:20:11 +02:00
Joshua Nelson
31e39446ec Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Dylan DPC
f42cdf76e1
Rollup merge of #100368 - chenyukang:fix-100321, r=lcnr
InferCtxt tainted_by_errors_flag should be Option<ErrorGuaranteed>

Fixes #100321.
Use Cell<Option<ErrorGuaranteed>> to guarantee that we emit an error when that flag is set.
2022-08-23 20:40:03 +05:30
Santiago Pastorino
4da14ef50e
Use CRATE_HIR_ID and CRATE_DEF_ID for obligations from foreign crates 2022-08-23 09:08:30 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
4cb492e740
Do not use unneeded extra errors variable 2022-08-23 08:55:43 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
ac0b6af37b
Permit negative impls coherence to take advantage of implied bounds 2022-08-23 08:55:43 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
5ff45dc89e
Move InferCtxtExt to rustc_trait_selection 2022-08-23 08:55:43 -03:00
Matthias Krüger
579dfa42be
Rollup merge of #100789 - compiler-errors:issue-99662, r=spastorino
Use separate infcx to solve obligations during negative coherence

I feel like I fixed this already but I may have fixed it then forgot to push the branch...

Also fixes up some redundant param-envs being passed around (since they're already passed around in the `Obligation`)

Fixes #99662

r? ``@spastorino``
2022-08-23 06:55:26 +02:00
Jack Wrenn
f46fffc276 safe transmute: use Assume struct to provide analysis options
This was left as a TODO in #92268, and brings the trait more in
line with what was defined in MCP411.

`Assume::visibility` has been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as
library safety is what's actually being assumed; visibility is
just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (this may
change).

ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
2022-08-22 18:37:54 +00:00
yukang
f466a7563d remove hack fix since we don't have no overflow diagnostic 2022-08-22 22:22:15 +08:00
bors
ee8c31e64d Auto merge of #100868 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-a1hfi1r, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #93162 (Std module docs improvements)
 - #99386 (Add tests that check `Vec::retain` predicate execution order.)
 - #99915 (Recover keywords in trait bounds)
 - #100694 (Migrate rustc_ast_passes diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic` and translatable messages (first part))
 - #100757 (Catch overflow early)

Failed merges:

 - #99917 (Move Error trait into core)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-22 08:32:41 +00:00
Dylan DPC
88e39b2c2e
Rollup merge of #100757 - ouz-a:issue-95134, r=jackh726
Catch overflow early

Although this code should raise an overflow error, it didn't because [check_recursion_limit](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_trait_selection/traits/select/struct.SelectionContext.html#method.check_recursion_limit) it checks for `depth = 128` but not for `129` which should have triggered the overflow error. Anyways this catches that error early.

Fixes #95134
2022-08-22 11:45:45 +05:30
bors
a9bb589cd6 Auto merge of #100676 - lcnr:implied-bounds-yay, r=nikomatsakis
implied bounds: explicitly state which types are assumed to be wf

Adds a new query which maps each definition to the types which that definition assumes to be well formed. The intent is to make it easier to reason about implied bounds.

This change should not influence the user-facing behavior of rustc. Notably, `borrowck` still only assumes that the function signature of associated functions is well formed while `wfcheck` assumes that the both the function signature and the impl trait ref is well formed. Not sure if that by itself can trigger UB or whether it's just annoying.

As a next step, we can add `WellFormed` predicates to `predicates_of` of these items and can stop adding the wf bounds at each place which uses them. I also intend to move the computation from `assumed_wf_types` to `implied_bounds` into the `param_env` computation. This requires me to take a deeper look at `compare_predicate_entailment` which is currently somewhat weird wrt implied bounds so I am not touching this here.

r? `@nikomatsakis`
2022-08-22 06:10:26 +00:00
Michael Goulet
d577eb09e5 Bless tests after #100769 2022-08-21 04:04:05 +00:00
Michael Goulet
d2f54b1990 Adjust messages, address some nits 2022-08-21 02:35:11 +00:00
Michael Goulet
8917894fda Targeted fixes addressing erroneous suggestions 2022-08-21 02:35:11 +00:00
Michael Goulet
70b29f7c2d Note closure kind mismatch cause 2022-08-21 02:35:11 +00:00
Michael Goulet
c005e760f5 Rework point-at-arg 2022-08-21 02:34:52 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
d793cd266c
Rollup merge of #100796 - TaKO8Ki:remove-unnecessary-string-searching, r=compiler-errors
Refactor: remove unnecessary string searchings

This patch removes unnecessary string searchings for checking if function arguments have `&` and `&mut`.
2022-08-20 19:45:17 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
7f0289623c
Rollup merge of #100769 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-adding-reference-to-trait-assoc-item, r=cjgillot
Suggest adding a reference to a trait assoc item

fixes #100289
2022-08-20 19:45:15 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
a311b8a4c5 use more descriptive names 2022-08-20 19:35:17 +09:00
Takayuki Maeda
973510749d remove unnecessary string searchings
remove unnecessary string searchings for checking if function arguments have `&` and `&mut`
2022-08-20 15:54:39 +09:00
Michael Goulet
ba7272959d Use separate infcx to solve obligations during negative coherence 2022-08-20 04:49:24 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda
64b3e4af20 suggest adding a reference to a trait assoc item 2022-08-20 02:51:20 +09:00
ouz-a
c198a20f7c Catch overflow early 2022-08-19 17:31:57 +03:00
Andy Wang
84a199369b
Reword "Required because of the requirements on the impl of ..." 2022-08-18 21:08:08 +01:00
bors
8064a49508 Auto merge of #99860 - oli-obk:revert_97346, r=pnkfelix
Revert "Rollup merge of #97346 - JohnTitor:remove-back-compat-hacks, …

…r=oli-obk"

This reverts commit c703d11dcc, reversing
changes made to 64eb9ab869.

it didn't apply cleanly, so now it works the same for RPIT and for TAIT instead of just working for RPIT, but we should keep those in sync anyway. It also exposed a TAIT bug (see the feature gated test that now ICEs).

r? `@pnkfelix`

fixes #99536
2022-08-18 15:41:30 +00:00
Michael Goulet
c4a5b14211 Avoid overflow in is_impossible_method 2022-08-18 01:12:46 +00:00
lcnr
736288f221 dedup some code 2022-08-17 18:14:25 +02:00
lcnr
1cede2c126 is_knowable use Result instead of Option 2022-08-17 10:17:54 +02:00
Michael Goulet
8b64988575 Fix error message with non-tupled bare fn trait 2022-08-16 01:21:11 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
a1fdea2b78
Rollup merge of #100514 - compiler-errors:issue-100191, r=spastorino
Delay span bug when failing to normalize negative coherence impl subject due to other malformed impls

Fixes #100191

r? ``@spastorino``
2022-08-15 20:11:36 +02:00
Michael Goulet
75dfe55a5d TypeError can be Copy 2022-08-14 19:58:46 +00:00
Dylan DPC
92344e369b
Rollup merge of #99861 - lcnr:orphan-check-cg, r=jackh726
orphan check: rationalize our handling of constants

cc `@rust-lang/types` `@rust-lang/project-const-generics` on whether you agree with this reasoning.

r? types
2022-08-14 17:09:13 +05:30
Michael Goulet
c436930f91 Delay span bug when failing to normalize negative coherence impl subject due to other malformed impls 2022-08-13 22:11:42 +00:00
lcnr
1ec2b9bce8 wf correctly shallow_resolve consts 2022-08-13 21:04:52 +02:00
KaDiWa
4eebcb9910
avoid cloning and then iterating 2022-08-13 16:16:52 +02:00
Mark Rousskov
154a09dd91 Adjust cfgs 2022-08-12 16:28:15 -04:00
bors
aeb5067967 Auto merge of #100315 - compiler-errors:norm-ct-in-proj, r=lcnr
Keep going if normalized projection has unevaluated consts in `QueryNormalizer`

#100312 was the wrong approach, I think this is the right one.

When normalizing a type, if we see that it's a projection, we currently defer to `tcx.normalize_projection_ty`, which normalizes the projections away but doesn't touch the unevaluated constants. So now we just continue to fold the type if it has unevaluated constants so we make sure to evaluate those too, if we can.

Fixes #100217
Fixes #83972
Fixes #84669
Fixes #86710
Fixes #82268
Fixes #73298
2022-08-11 10:47:48 +00:00
Michael Goulet
d2667e4b71 Move folding into just projection cases 2022-08-09 18:19:58 +00:00
bors
63e4312e6b Auto merge of #99217 - lcnr:implied-bounds-pre-norm, r=lcnr
consider unnormalized types for implied bounds

extracted, and slightly modified, from #98900

The idea here is that generally, rustc is split into things which can assume its inputs are well formed[^1], and things which have verify that themselves.

Generally most predicates should only deal with well formed inputs, e.g. a `&'a &'b (): Trait` predicate should be able to assume that `'b: 'a` holds. Normalization can loosen wf requirements (see #91068) and must therefore not be used in places which still have to check well formedness. The only such place should hopefully be `WellFormed` predicates

fixes #87748 and #98543

r? `@jackh726` cc `@rust-lang/types`

[^1]: These places may still encounter non-wf inputs and have to deal with them without causing an ICE as we may check for well formedness out of order.
2022-08-09 16:39:43 +00:00
Dylan DPC
d910e5376b
Rollup merge of #100221 - compiler-errors:impossible-trait-items, r=lcnr,notriddle,camelid
Don't document impossible to call default trait items on impls

Closes #100176

This only skips documenting _default_ trait items on impls, not ones that are written inside the impl block. This is a conservative approach, since I think we should document all items written in an impl block (I guess unless hidden or whatever), but the existence of this new query I added makes this easy to extend to other rustdoc cases.
2022-08-09 17:34:54 +05:30
lcnr
f25cb83296 don't normalize wf predicates
this allows us to soundly use unnormalized projections for wf
2022-08-09 12:54:32 +02:00
Michael Goulet
ca7e3c4a83 Keep going if normalized projection has unevaluated consts in QueryNormalizer 2022-08-09 09:41:28 +00:00
Michael Goulet
3fdf3cb80c Adjust wording 2022-08-08 00:13:41 +00:00
Michael Goulet
750f04d309 Implement special-cased projection error message for some common traits 2022-08-07 23:57:53 +00:00
Michael Goulet
b3b23aada9 Don't document impossible to call default trait items on impls 2022-08-07 23:44:05 +00:00
Michael Goulet
d0e4c679ff Built-in implementation of Tuple trait 2022-08-07 16:31:03 -07:00
bors
bd04658eb6 Auto merge of #99743 - compiler-errors:fulfillment-context-cleanups, r=jackh726
Some `FulfillmentContext`-related cleanups

Use `ObligationCtxt` in some places, remove some `FulfillmentContext`s in others...

r? types
2022-08-06 06:48:15 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
01ccde5ec8
Rollup merge of #100095 - jackh726:early-binder, r=lcnr
More EarlyBinder cleanups

Each commit is independent

r? types
2022-08-04 22:25:04 +02:00
Michael Goulet
f5af266b6d Address nits 2022-08-04 13:59:25 +00:00
Michael Goulet
fe894756f8 Add traits::fully_solve_obligation that acts like traits::fully_normalize
It spawns up a trait engine, registers the single obligation, then fully
solves it
2022-08-04 13:50:56 +00:00
Michael Goulet
3e48434cc7 Use ObligationCtxt in impossible_predicates 2022-08-04 13:42:13 +00:00
Michael Goulet
61d9b1656d Remove unnecessary FulfillmentContext from need_migrate_deref_output_trait_object 2022-08-04 13:42:13 +00:00
Michael Goulet
37d412cff7 Remove FulfillmentContext param from fully_normalize 2022-08-04 13:42:13 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
02fcec2ac8
Rollup merge of #99795 - compiler-errors:delay-specialization-normalize-error, r=spastorino
Delay a bug when failed to normalize trait ref during specialization

The error messages still kinda suck here but they don't ICE anymore...

Fixes #45814
Fixes #43037

r? types
2022-08-03 22:29:30 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
0de7f756f0
Rollup merge of #99746 - compiler-errors:more-trait-engine, r=jackh726
Use `TraitEngine` in more places that don't specifically need `FulfillmentContext::new_in_snapshot`

Not sure if this change is worthwhile, but couldn't hurt re: chalkification

r? types
2022-08-03 22:29:27 +02:00
Jack Huey
955fcad758 Add bound_impl_subject and bound_return_ty 2022-08-03 01:02:46 -04:00
Jack Huey
96a69dce2c Change sized_constraints to return EarlyBinder 2022-08-03 00:14:24 -04:00
Jack Huey
e21624dc80 Add bound_predicates_of and bound_explicit_predicates_of 2022-08-02 22:44:08 -04:00
bors
b759b2efad Auto merge of #99509 - lcnr:commit_unconditionally, r=jackh726
remove `commit_unconditionally`

`commit_unconditionally` is a noop unless we somehow inspect the current state of our snapshot. The only thing which does that is the leak check which was only used in one place where `commit_if_ok` is probably at least as, or even more, correct.

r? rust-lang/types
2022-08-03 01:55:20 +00:00
Michael Goulet
16a3601f62 Delay a bug when failed to normalize trait ref during specialization 2022-08-03 01:37:02 +00:00
bors
e4417cf020 Auto merge of #92268 - jswrenn:transmute, r=oli-obk
Initial implementation of transmutability trait.

*T'was the night before Christmas and all through the codebase, not a miri was stirring — no hint of `unsafe`!*

This PR provides an initial, **incomplete** implementation of *[MCP 411: Lang Item for Transmutability](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411)*. The `core::mem::BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` trait provided by this PR is implemented on-the-fly by the compiler for types `Src` and `Dst` when the bits of all possible values of type `Src` are safely reinterpretable as a value of type `Dst`.

What this PR provides is:
- [x] [support for transmutations involving primitives](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/tree/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/primitives)
- [x] [support for transmutations involving arrays](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/tree/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/arrays)
- [x] [support for transmutations involving structs](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/tree/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/structs)
- [x] [support for transmutations involving enums](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/tree/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/enums)
- [x] [support for transmutations involving unions](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/tree/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/unions)
- [x] [support for weaker validity checks](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/blob/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/unions/should_permit_intersecting_if_validity_is_assumed.rs) (i.e., `Assume::VALIDITY`)
- [x] visibility checking

What isn't yet implemented:
- [ ] transmutability options passed using the `Assume` struct
- [ ] [support for references](https://github.com/jswrenn/rust/blob/transmute/src/test/ui/transmutability/references.rs)
- [ ] smarter error messages

These features will be implemented in future PRs.
2022-08-02 21:17:31 +00:00
bors
4493a0f472 Auto merge of #100063 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-lznouys, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #99987 (Always include a position span in `rustc_parse_format::Argument`)
 - #100005 (Remove Clean trait for ast::Attribute and improve Attributes::from_ast)
 - #100025 (Remove redundant `TransferWrapper` struct)
 - #100045 (Properly reject the `may_unwind` option in `global_asm!`)
 - #100052 (RISC-V ASM test: relax label name constraint.)
 - #100053 (move [`assertions_on_result_states`] to restriction)
 - #100057 (Remove more Clean trait implementations)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-02 17:18:58 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
a0991b8ba8
Rollup merge of #99987 - Alexendoo:parse-format-position-span, r=fee1-dead
Always include a position span in `rustc_parse_format::Argument`

Moves the spans from the `Position` enum to always be included in the `Argument` struct. Doesn't make any changes to use it in rustc, but it will be useful for some upcoming Clippy lints
2022-08-02 17:17:30 +02:00
bors
06f4950cbd Auto merge of #100032 - BoxyUwU:no_ty_in_placeholder_const, r=compiler-errors
make `PlaceholderConst` not store the type of the const

Currently the `Placeholder` variant on `ConstKind` is 28 bytes when with this PR its 8 bytes, i am not sure this is really useful at all rn since `Unevaluated` and `Value` variants are huge still but eventually it should be possible to get both down to 16 bytes 🤔. Mostly opening this to see if this change has any perf impact when done before it can make `ConstKind`/`ConstS` smaller
2022-08-02 13:10:49 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
0629445300
Rollup merge of #99156 - lcnr:omoe-wa, r=wesleywiser
`codegen_fulfill_obligation` expect erased regions

it's a query, so by erasing regions before calling it, we get better caching.
This doesn't actually change anything as its already the status quo.
2022-08-02 07:30:39 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
957548183d Remove trait_of_item query. 2022-08-01 21:39:26 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
d7ea161b7e Remove DefId from AssocItemContainer. 2022-08-01 21:38:45 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
110f0656cb Store associated item defaultness in impl_defaultness. 2022-08-01 21:38:16 +02:00
Ellen
49d001c5f3 fmt... 2022-08-01 20:15:58 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
4606830f83
Rollup merge of #100012 - TaKO8Ki:avoid-ty-to-string-conversions, r=fee1-dead
Avoid `Ty` to `String` conversions

follow-up to #98668
2022-08-01 16:49:34 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
8db3d7cfb6
Rollup merge of #99911 - cjgillot:no-guess, r=davidtwco
Remove some uses of `guess_head_span`

That function cuts a span at the first occurrence of `{`.  Using `def_span` is almost always more precise.
2022-08-01 16:49:31 +02:00
Ellen
825a7cc65c make PlaceholderConst not store the type of the const 2022-08-01 15:42:38 +01:00
Takayuki Maeda
92b31ccb73 avoid Ty to String conversions 2022-08-01 12:52:30 +09:00
Alex Macleod
2a0b51d852 Always include a position span in rustc_parse_format::Argument 2022-07-31 15:11:33 +00:00
Dylan DPC
eb378d2015
Rollup merge of #99862 - WaffleLapkin:type_mismatch_fix, r=compiler-errors
Improve type mismatch w/ function signatures

This PR makes use of `note: expected/found` (instead of labeling types in labels) in type mismatch with function signatures. Pros: it's easier to compare the signatures, cons: the error is a little more verbose now.

This is especially nice when
- The signatures differ in a small subset of parameters (same parameters are elided)
- The difference is in details, for example `isize` vs `usize` (there is a better chance that the types align)

Also this PR fixes the inconsistency in variable names in the edited code (`expected` and `found`).

A zulip thread from which this pr started: [[link]](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/147480-t-compiler.2Fwg-diagnostics/topic/Type.20error.20regression.3F.2E.2E.2E/near/289756602).

An example diagnostic:

<table>
<tr>
<th>this pr</th>
<th>nightly</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>

```text
error[E0631]: type mismatch in function arguments
  --> ./t.rs:4:12
   |
4  |     expect(&f);
   |     ------ ^^ expected due to this
   |     |
   |     required by a bound introduced by this call
...
10 | fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
   | ---------------------------------- found signature defined here
   |
   = note: expected function signature `fn(usize, _, Vec<u64>) -> _`
              found function signature `fn(isize, _, Vec<u32>) -> _`
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `Trait` for `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}`
  --> ./t.rs:8:9
   |
8  | impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}
   |         ^^^^^     ^
   = note: required for the cast from `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}` to the object type `dyn Trait`
```

</td>
<td>

```text
error[E0631]: type mismatch in function arguments
  --> ./t.rs:4:12
   |
4  |     expect(&f);
   |     ------ ^^ expected signature of `fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> _`
   |     |
   |     required by a bound introduced by this call
...
10 | fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
   | ---------------------------------- found signature of `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) -> _`
   |
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `Trait` for `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}`
  --> ./t.rs:8:9
   |
8  | impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}
   |         ^^^^^     ^
   = note: required for the cast to the object type `dyn Trait`
```

</td>
</tr>
</table>

<details><summary>code</summary>
<p>

```rust
fn main() {
    fn expect(_: &dyn Trait) {}

    expect(&f);
}

trait Trait {}
impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}

fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
```

</p>
</details>

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-07-30 20:39:47 +05:30
Dylan DPC
c668820365
Rollup merge of #99311 - kckeiks:clean-up-body-owner-methods, r=cjgillot
change maybe_body_owned_by to take local def id

Issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96341
r? `@cjgillot`
2022-07-30 20:39:46 +05:30
bors
110777b60c Auto merge of #99796 - compiler-errors:issue-53475, r=oli-obk
use `check_region_obligations_and_report_errors` to avoid ICEs

If we don't call `process_registered_region_obligations` before `resolve_regions_and_report_errors` then we'll ICE if we have any region obligations, and `check_region_obligations_and_report_errors` just does both of these for us in a nice convenient function.

Fixes #53475

r? types
2022-07-30 09:35:22 +00:00
Yuki Okushi
4a44efae14
Rollup merge of #99671 - TaKO8Ki:suggest-dereferencing-index, r=compiler-errors
Suggest dereferencing index when trying to use a reference of usize as index

fixes #96678
2022-07-30 07:39:50 +09:00
Miguel Guarniz
16513d689e Rename local_did to def_id
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
2022-07-29 18:26:10 -04:00
Miguel Guarniz
25bdc8965e Change maybe_body_owned_by to take local def id
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
2022-07-29 18:25:58 -04:00
Oli Scherer
92bc9db881 never inline the only thing that calls a query, which could hit the instrument path 2022-07-29 15:41:15 +00:00
lcnr
2634309eb3 update comment 2022-07-29 09:44:20 +02:00
Michael Goulet
16f49800db Document check_region_obligations_and_report_errors, simplify a call to resolve_regions 2022-07-29 06:17:17 +00:00