Allow the `asm!` macro to accept a series of template arguments, and
interpret them as if they were concatenated with a '\n' between them.
This allows writing an `asm!` where each line of assembly appears in a
separate template string argument.
This syntax makes it possible for rustfmt to reliably format and indent
each line of assembly, without risking changes to the inside of a
template string. It also avoids the complexity of having the user
carefully format and indent a multi-line string (including where to put
the surrounding quotes), and avoids the extra indentation and lines of a
call to `concat!`.
For example, rewriting the second example from the [blog post on the new
inline assembly
syntax](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2020/06/08/new-inline-asm.html)
using multiple template strings:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut bits = [0u8; 64];
for value in 0..=1024u64 {
let popcnt;
unsafe {
asm!(
" popcnt {popcnt}, {v}",
"2:",
" blsi rax, {v}",
" jz 1f",
" xor {v}, rax",
" tzcnt rax, rax",
" stosb",
" jmp 2b",
"1:",
v = inout(reg) value => _,
popcnt = out(reg) popcnt,
out("rax") _, // scratch
inout("rdi") bits.as_mut_ptr() => _,
);
}
println!("bits of {}: {:?}", value, &bits[0..popcnt]);
}
}
```
Note that all the template strings must appear before all other
arguments; you cannot, for instance, provide a series of template
strings intermixed with the corresponding operands.
In order to get srcloc mappings right for macros that generate
multi-line string literals, create one line_span for each
line in the string literal, each pointing to the macro.
Make `rustc_parse_format::Parser::curarg` `pub`, so that we can
propagate it from one template string argument to the next.
Currently, `asm!` parsing uses an `expect` for the last parsed
pseudo-keyword (`sym`), which makes it difficult to extend without
simultaneously refactoring. Use `eat` for the last pseudo-keyword, and
then add an `else` that fails parsing. No change to error output.
expand: More precise locations for expansion-time lints
First commit: a macro expansion doesn't have a `NodeId` associated with it, but it has a parent `DefId` which we can use for linting.
The observable effect is that lints associated with macro expansions can now be `allow`ed at finer-grained level than whole crate.
Second commit: each macro definition has a `NodeId` which we can use for linting, unless that macro definition was decoded from other crate.
Suggest including unused asm arguments in a comment to avoid error
We require all arguments to an `asm!` to be used in the template string, just like format strings. However in some cases (e.g. `black_box`) it may be desirable to have `asm!` arguments that are not used in the template string.
Currently this is a hard error rather than a lint since `#[allow]` does not work on macros (#63221), so this PR suggests using the unused arguments in an asm comment as a workaround.
r? @petrochenkov
Previously, we would parse `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;`
identically, leading to an 'empty' `where` clause being omitted during
pretty printing. This will cause us to lose spans when proc-macros
involved, since we will have a collected `where` token that does not
appear in the pretty-printed item.
We now explicitly track the presence of a `where` token during parsing,
so that we can distinguish between `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;`
during pretty-printing
Use `T`'s discriminant type in `mem::Discriminant<T>` instead of `u64`.
fixes#70509
Adds the lang-item `discriminant_kind`.
Updates the function signature of `intrinsics::discriminant_value`.
Adds the *probably permanently unstable* trait `DiscriminantKind`.
`mem::Discriminant` should now be smaller in some cases.
r? @ghost
