Casual grepping revealed some places in the codebase (some of which
antedated `if let`'s December 2014 stabilization in c200ae5a) where we
were using a match with a `None => ()` arm where (in the present
author's opinion) an `if let` conditional would be more readable. (Other
places where matching to the unit value did seem to better express the
intent were left alone.)
It's likely that we don't care about making such trivial,
non-functional, sheerly æsthetic changes.
But if we do, this is a patch.
derive Hash (and not Copy) for ranges
Fixes#34170.
Also, `RangeInclusive` was `Copy` by mistake -- fix that, which is a [breaking-change] to that unstable type.
Improve IP reserved address docs
- Add links to all RFCs to make it clear these are not Rust RFCs.
- Correct RFC numbers to match the numbers in [RFC 6890](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6890)
- Clean up formatting to show addresses and ranges in parentheses like (255.255.255.255)
r? @steveklabnik
rustdoc: Fix redirect pages for renamed reexports
We need to use the name of the target not the name of the current item
when creating the link.
An example in `std` is [`std::sys::ext`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/sys/ext/index.html).
rustdoc: Don't inline #[doc(hidden)] pub use
Currently if a `#[doc(hidden)] pub use` item is inlined the `hidden`
attribute is ignored so the item can appear in the docs. By never inlining
such imports, they can be stripped.
An example in `std` is [`__OsLocalKeyInner`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/thread/struct.__OsLocalKeyInner.html) which clearly should not be documented.
- Add links to all RFCs to make it clear these are not Rust RFCs.
- Correct RFC numbers to match the numbers in [RFC 6890](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6890)
- Clean up formatting to show addresses and ranges in parentheses like (255.255.255.255)
It turns out that the subsequent lines of the error message comment
should be aligned like this.
The "turns the corresponding compiler warning" language may not be
strictly the most accurate—a lint check isn't the same as a compiler
warning; it emits a compiler warning if it's set to the `warn` level—
but it may be worth glossing over such distinctions in favor of simple,
familar phrasings for the sake of pedagogy; thanks to Guillaume Gomez
for the wording suggestion.
Let's also fix up the introductory clauses of the sentences about how to
fix the error to put a little more emphasis on the fact that the
`forbid` setting was probably there for a reason.
Add explanations for E0503 and E0508.
(cannot use `..` because it was mutably borrowed, cannot move out of type `..`, a non-copy fixed-size array)
Part of #32777.
add a test case for issue #32031
I propose a test case to finish the fix for issue #32031. Please review this commit thoroughly, as I have never written a codegen test before.
r? @eddyb
