Trait upcasting coercion (part1)
This revives the first part of earlier PR #60900 .
It's not very clear to me which parts of that pr was design decisions, so i decide to cut it into pieces and land them incrementally. This allows more eyes on the details.
This is the first part, it adds feature gates, adds feature gates tests, and implemented the unsize conversion part.
(I hope i have dealt with the `ExistentialTraitRef` values correctly...)
The next part will be implementing the pointer casting.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86072 (Cross compiling rustc_llvm on Darwin requires zlib.)
- #87385 (Make `SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS` warn by default)
- #87547 (Add missing examples for NonNull)
- #87557 (Fix issue with autofix for ambiguous associated function from Rust 2021 prelude when struct is generic)
- #87559 (Tweak borrowing suggestion in `for` loop)
- #87596 (Add warning when whitespace is not skipped after an escaped newline)
- #87606 (Add some TAIT-related regression tests)
- #87609 (Add docs about performance and `Iterator::map` to `[T; N]::map`)
- #87616 (Fix missing word in rustdoc book)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix issue with autofix for ambiguous associated function from Rust 2021 prelude when struct is generic
Fixes#86940
The test cases and associated issue should make it clear what specifically this is meant to fix. The fix is slightly hacky in that we check against the literal source code of the call site for the presence of `<` in order to determine if the user has included the generics for the struct (meaning we don't need to include them for them).
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Use more precise span for E0282 in cast expressions
This pull request fixes#85586. The example code given there:
```rust
fn main() {
let a = [1, 2, 3].iter().sum();
let b = (a + 1) as usize;
}
```
currently produces
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> issue-85586.rs:3:13
|
3 | let b = (a + 1) as usize;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type
|
= note: type must be known at this point
error: aborting due to previous error
```
even though the type of the entire cast expression quite clearly should be `usize`. The error is in the cast's left-hand side, which is made explicit by the changes in this PR:
```
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> issue-85586.rs:3:13
|
3 | let b = (a + 1) as usize;
| ^^^^^^^ cannot infer type
|
= note: type must be known at this point
error: aborting due to previous error
```
2229: Discr should be read when PatKind is Range
This PR fixes an issue related to pattern matching in closures when Edition 2021 is enabled.
- If any of the patterns the discr is being matched on is `PatKind::Range` then the discr should be read
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87426
2229: Don't capture preicese paths on top of a union
- Accessing fields of a union require unsafe block
- As part of 2229 we don't allow precision where we need an unsafe block
to capture.
Fixes: #87378
r? `@nikomatsakis`
- Accessing fields of a union require unsafe block
- As part of 2229 we don't allow precision where we need an unsafe block
to capture.
Fixes: #87378
r? @nikomatsakis
dont provide fwd declared params to cg defaults
Fixes#83938
```rust
#![feature(const_evaluatable_checked, const_generics, const_generics_defaults)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
pub struct Bar<const N: usize, const M: usize = { N + 1 }>;
pub fn foo<const N1: usize>() -> Bar<N1> { loop {} }
fn main() {}
```
This PR makes this code no longer ICE, it was ICE'ing previously because when building substs for `Bar<N1>` we would subst the anon ct: `ConstKind::Unevaluated({N + 1}, substs: [N, M])` with substs of `[N1]`. the anon const has forward declared params supplied though so we end up trying to substitute the provided `M` param which causes the ICE.
This PR doesn't handle the predicates of the const so
```rust
trait Foo<const N: usize> { const Assoc: usize; }
pub struct Bar<const N: usize = { <()>::Assoc }> where (): Foo<N>;
```
Resolves to `<() as Foo<N>>::Assoc` which can allow for using fwd declared params indirectly.
```rust
trait Foo<const N: usize> {}
struct Bar<const N: usize = { 2 + 3 }> where (): Foo<N>;
```
This code also ICEs under this PR because instantiating the default's predicates causes an ICE as predicates_of contains predicates with fwd declared params
PR was briefly discussed [in this zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/evil.20preds.20in.20param.20env.20.2386580)
Support HIR wf checking for function signatures
During function type-checking, we normalize any associated types in
the function signature (argument types + return type), and then
create WF obligations for each of the normalized types. The HIR wf code
does not currently support this case, so any errors that we get have
imprecise spans.
This commit extends `ObligationCauseCode::WellFormed` to support
recording a function parameter, allowing us to get the corresponding
HIR type if an error occurs. Function typechecking is modified to
pass this information during signature normalization and WF checking.
The resulting code is fairly verbose, due to the fact that we can
no longer normalize the entire signature with a single function call.
As part of the refactoring, we now perform HIR-based WF checking
for several other 'typed items' (statics, consts, and inherent impls).
As a result, WF and projection errors in a function signature now
have a precise span, which points directly at the responsible type.
If a function signature is constructed via a macro, this will allow
the error message to point at the code 'most responsible' for the error
(e.g. a user-supplied macro argument).
Fix implicit Sized relaxation when attempting to relax other, unsupported trait
Fixes#87199.
Do note that this bug fix causes code like the `ref_arg::<[i32]>(&[5]);` line in the test case in combination with an affected function to no longer compile.
During function type-checking, we normalize any associated types in
the function signature (argument types + return type), and then
create WF obligations for each of the normalized types. The HIR wf code
does not currently support this case, so any errors that we get have
imprecise spans.
This commit extends `ObligationCauseCode::WellFormed` to support
recording a function parameter, allowing us to get the corresponding
HIR type if an error occurs. Function typechecking is modified to
pass this information during signature normalization and WF checking.
The resulting code is fairly verbose, due to the fact that we can
no longer normalize the entire signature with a single function call.
As part of the refactoring, we now perform HIR-based WF checking
for several other 'typed items' (statics, consts, and inherent impls).
As a result, WF and projection errors in a function signature now
have a precise span, which points directly at the responsible type.
If a function signature is constructed via a macro, this will allow
the error message to point at the code 'most responsible' for the error
(e.g. a user-supplied macro argument).
Various diagnostics clean ups/tweaks
* Always point at macros, including derive macros
* Point at non-local items that introduce a trait requirement
* On private associated item, point at definition
* Always point at macros, including derive macros
* Point at non-local items that introduce a trait requirement
* On private associated item, point at definition
Check that const parameters of trait methods have compatible types
This PR fixes#86820. The problem is that this currently passes the type checker:
```rust
trait Tr {
fn foo<const N: u8>(self) -> u8;
}
impl Tr for f32 {
fn foo<const N: bool>(self) -> u8 { 42 }
}
```
i.e. the type checker fails to check whether const parameters in `impl` methods have the same type as the corresponding declaration in the trait. With my changes, I get, for the above code:
```
error[E0053]: method `foo` has an incompatible const parameter type for trait
--> test.rs:6:18
|
6 | fn foo<const N: bool>(self) -> u8 { 42 }
| ^
|
note: the const parameter `N` has type `bool`, but the declaration in trait `Tr::foo` has type `u8`
--> test.rs:2:18
|
2 | fn foo<const N: u8>(self) -> u8;
| ^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
This fixes#86820, where an ICE happens later on because the trait method is declared with a const parameter of type `u8`, but the `impl` uses one of type `usize`:
> `expected int of size 8, but got size 1`
Add initial implementation of HIR-based WF checking for diagnostics
During well-formed checking, we walk through all types 'nested' in
generic arguments. For example, WF-checking `Option<MyStruct<u8>>`
will cause us to check `MyStruct<u8>` and `u8`. However, this is done
on a `rustc_middle::ty::Ty`, which has no span information. As a result,
any errors that occur will have a very general span (e.g. the
definintion of an associated item).
This becomes a problem when macros are involved. In general, an
associated type like `type MyType = Option<MyStruct<u8>>;` may
have completely different spans for each nested type in the HIR. Using
the span of the entire associated item might end up pointing to a macro
invocation, even though a user-provided span is available in one of the
nested types.
This PR adds a framework for HIR-based well formed checking. This check
is only run during error reporting, and is used to obtain a more precise
span for an existing error. This is accomplished by individually
checking each 'nested' type in the HIR for the type, allowing us to
find the most-specific type (and span) that produces a given error.
The majority of the changes are to the error-reporting code. However,
some of the general trait code is modified to pass through more
information.
Since this has no soundness implications, I've implemented a minimal
version to begin with, which can be extended over time. In particular,
this only works for HIR items with a corresponding `DefId` (e.g. it will
not work for WF-checking performed within function bodies).
During well-formed checking, we walk through all types 'nested' in
generic arguments. For example, WF-checking `Option<MyStruct<u8>>`
will cause us to check `MyStruct<u8>` and `u8`. However, this is done
on a `rustc_middle::ty::Ty`, which has no span information. As a result,
any errors that occur will have a very general span (e.g. the
definintion of an associated item).
This becomes a problem when macros are involved. In general, an
associated type like `type MyType = Option<MyStruct<u8>>;` may
have completely different spans for each nested type in the HIR. Using
the span of the entire associated item might end up pointing to a macro
invocation, even though a user-provided span is available in one of the
nested types.
This PR adds a framework for HIR-based well formed checking. This check
is only run during error reporting, and is used to obtain a more precise
span for an existing error. This is accomplished by individually
checking each 'nested' type in the HIR for the type, allowing us to
find the most-specific type (and span) that produces a given error.
The majority of the changes are to the error-reporting code. However,
some of the general trait code is modified to pass through more
information.
Since this has no soundness implications, I've implemented a minimal
version to begin with, which can be extended over time. In particular,
this only works for HIR items with a corresponding `DefId` (e.g. it will
not work for WF-checking performed within function bodies).
