Don't compute trait super bounds unless they're positive
Fixes#111207
The comment is modified to explain the rationale for why we even have this recursive call to supertraits in the first place, which doesn't apply to negative bounds since they don't elaborate at all.
STD support for PSVita
This PR adds std support for `armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf` target.
The work here is fairly similar to #95897, just for a different target platform.
This depends on the following pull requests:
rust-lang/backtrace-rs#523rust-lang/libc#3209
Update max_atomic_width of armv7r and armv7_sony_vita targets to 64.
All armv7a and armv7r implementations support `ldrexd`/`strexd`, only armv7m does not.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110297 (Make `(try_)subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions` take `EarlyBinder`)
- #110827 (Fix lifetime suggestion for type aliases with objects in them)
- #111022 (Use smaller ints for bitflags)
- #111056 (Fix some suggestions where a `Box<T>` is expected.)
- #111262 (Further normalize msvc-non-utf8-ouput)
- #111265 (Make generics_of has_self on RPITITs delegate to the opaque)
- #111323 (Give a more helpful error when running the rustc shim directly)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make generics_of has_self on RPITITs delegate to the opaque
r? `@compiler-errors`
I couldn't come up with a test case and none of the ones in the `tests` folder is impacted by this change, but I still think is the right thing to do.
Michael, let me know if you have ideas on how to add a test that's affected by this change.
Fix some suggestions where a `Box<T>` is expected.
This fixes#111011, and also adds a suggestion for boxing a unit type when a `Box<T>` was expected and an empty block was found.
Fix lifetime suggestion for type aliases with objects in them
Fixes an issue identified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110761#issuecomment-1520678479
This suggestion, like many other borrowck suggestions, are very fragile and there are other ways to trigger strange behavior even after this PR, so this is just a small improvement and not a total rework 💀
Make `(try_)subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions` take `EarlyBinder`
Changes `subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions` and `try_subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions` to take `EarlyBinder<T>` instead of `T`.
(related to #105779)
This was suggested by `@BoxyUwU` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107753#discussion_r1105828139. After changing `type_of` to return `EarlyBinder`, there were several places where the binder was immediately skipped to call `tcx.subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions`, only for the binder to be reconstructed inside of that method.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
enable `rust_2018_idioms` lint group for doctests
With this change, `rust_2018_idioms` lint group will be enabled for compiler/libstd doctests.
Resolves#106086Resolves#99144
Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
We really shouldn't be naming functions `fn check_*` unless they're
doing *typechecking*. It's especially misleading when we're doing this
inside of HIR typeck.
Rename InstCombine to InstSimplify
```
╭ ➜ ben@archlinux:~/rust
╰ ➤ rg -i instcombine
src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/mir/optimizations.md
134:may have been misapplied. Examples of this are `InstCombine` and `ConstantPropagation`.
src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/disabled/dist-x86_64-haiku/llvm-config.sh
38: instcombine instrumentation interpreter ipo irreader lanai \
tests/codegen/slice_as_from_ptr_range.rs
4:// min-llvm-version: 15.0 (because this is a relatively new instcombine)
```
r? `@scottmcm`
Support return-type bounds on associated methods from supertraits
Support `T: Trait<method(): Bound>` when `method` comes from a supertrait, aligning it with the behavior of associated type bounds (both equality and trait bounds).
The only wrinkle is that I have to extend `super_predicates_that_define_assoc_type` to look for *all* items, not just `AssocKind::Ty`. This will also be needed to support `feature(associated_const_equality)` as well, which is subtly broken when it comes to supertraits, though this PR does not fix those yet. There's a slight chance there's a perf regression here, in which case I guess I could split it out into a separate query.
Emit while_true lint spanning the entire loop condition
The lint that suggests `loop {}` instead of `while true {}` has functionality to 'pierce' parenthesis in cases like `while (true) {}`. In these cases, the emitted span only went to the hi of the `true` itself, not spanning the entire loop condition.
Before:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
After:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
This is especially a problem for rustfix.
added TraitAlias to check_item() for missing_docs
As in issue #111025 the `missing_docs` was not being triggered for trait aliases. I added `TraitAlias` to the pattern match for check_item(), and the lint seems to be behaving appropriately
Operand::extract_field: only cast llval if it's a pointer and replace bitcast w/ pointercast.
Fixes#105439.
Also cc `@erikdesjardins,` looks like another place to cleanup as part of #105545
Expand the LLVM coverage of `--print target-cpus`
We've been relying on a custom patch to add `MCSubtargetInfo::getCPUTable`
for `rustc --print target-cpus`, and just printing that it's not supported
on external LLVM builds. LLVM `main` now has `getAllProcessorDescriptions`
that can replace ours, so now we try to use that. In addition, the fallback
path can at least print the native and default cpu options.
There were also some mismatches in the function signatures here between
`LLVM_RUSTLLVM` and otherwise; this is now mitigated by sharing these
functions and only using cpp to adjust the function bodies.
Output LLVM optimization remark kind in `-Cremark` output
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90833, the optimization remark kind has not been printed. Therefore it wasn't possible to easily determine from the log (in a programmatic way) which remark kind was produced. I think that the most interesting remarks are the missed ones, which can lead users to some code optimization.
Maybe we could also change the format closer to the "old" one:
```
note: optimization remark for tailcallelim at /checkout/src/libcore/num/mod.rs:1:0: marked this call a tail call candidate
```
I wanted to programatically parse the remarks so that they could work e.g. with https://github.com/OfekShilon/optview2. However, now that I think about it, probably the proper solution is to tell rustc to output them to YAML and then use the YAML as input for the opt remark visualization tools. The flag for enabling this does not seem to work though (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96705#issuecomment-1117632322).
Still I think that it's good to output the remark kind anyway, it's an important piece of information.
r? ```@tmiasko```
