Now that rustdoc understands proper language tags
as the code not being Rust, we can tag everything
properly.
This change tags examples in other languages by
their language. Plain notations are marked as `text`.
Console examples are marked as `console`.
Also fix markdown.rs to not highlight non-rust code.
This completes the last stage of the renaming of the comparison hierarchy of
traits. This change renames TotalEq to Eq and TotalOrd to Ord.
In the future the new Eq/Ord will be filled out with their appropriate methods,
but for now this change is purely a renaming change.
[breaking-change]
By dropping the intermediate vector that holds the relevant candidates
including duplicates and directly building the vector that has the
duplicates removed we can eliminate quite a few allocations. This
reduces the times for type checking by 5-10% (measured with libstd,
libsyntax and librustc).
By dropping the intermediate vector that holds the relevant candidates
including duplicates and directly building the vector that has the
duplicates removed we can eliminate quite a few allocations. This
reduces the times for type checking by 5-10% (measured with libstd,
libsyntax and librustc).
This is part of the ongoing renaming of the equality traits. See #12517 for more
details. All code using Eq/Ord will temporarily need to move to Partial{Eq,Ord}
or the Total{Eq,Ord} traits. The Total traits will soon be renamed to {Eq,Ord}.
cc #12517
[breaking-change]
Make check_for_assignment_to_restricted_or_frozen_location treat
mutation through an owning pointer the same way it treats mutation
through an &mut pointer, where mutability must be inherited from the
base path.
I also included GC pointers in this check, as that is what the
corresponding code in gather_loans/restrictions.rs does, but I don't
think there is a way to test this with the current language.
Fixes#14498.
Make check_for_assignment_to_restricted_or_frozen_location treat
mutation through an owning pointer the same way it treats mutation
through an &mut pointer, where mutability must be inherited from the
base path.
I also included GC pointers in this check, as that is what the
corresponding code in gather_loans/restrictions.rs does, but I don't
think there is a way to test this with the current language.
Fixes#14498.
So far the DWARF information for enums was different for regular enums, univariant enums, Option-like enums, etc. Regular enums were encoded as unions of structs, while the other variants were encoded as bare structs. With the changes in this PR all enums are encoded as unions so that debuggers can reconstruct if something originally was a struct, a univariant enum, or an Option-like enum. For the latter case, information about the *Null* variant is encoded into the union field name. This information can then be used by the debugger to print a `None` value actually as `None` instead of `Some(0x0)`.
The changes in this PR should also fix the regression reported in #14385 and #14411, but I want to close these only after I have confirmation from the original reporters that the issues are actually fixed for them.
So far the DWARF information for enums was different
for regular enums, univariant enums, Option-like enums,
etc. Regular enums were encoded as unions of structs,
while the other variants were encoded as bare structs.
With the changes in this PR all enums are encoded as
unions so that debuggers can reconstruct if something
originally was a struct, a univariant enum, or an
Option-like enum. For the latter case, information
about the Null variant is encoded into the union field
name. This information can then be used by the
debugger to print a None value actually as None
instead of Some(0x0).
rustc: clarify warning about native deps for a staticlib.
This adjusts the "unlinked native library" warning one receives when
compiling with `crate_type="staticlib"`. The warning is just trying to
tell the user that they need to link against these libraries, but the
old text wasn't making this obvious, the new text says this explicitly.
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new
libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental.
This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be
explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code
using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the
crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this.
Closes#12019
[breaking-change]
This adjusts the "unlinked native library" warning one receives when
compiling with `crate_type="staticlib"`. The warning is just trying to
tell the user that they need to link against these libraries, but the
old text wasn't making this obvious; the new text says this explicitly.
Change `for` desugaring & make refutable pattern errors more precise
This changes for to desugar to the `let`-based pattern match as described in #14390, and adjusts the compiler to use this information for error messages that even mention that it's in a `for` loop.
Also, it makes the compiler record the exact positions of refutable parts of a pattern, to point to exactly them in error messages.
This ensures that a public typedef to a private item is ensured to be public in
terms of linkage. This affects both the visibility of the library's symbols as
well as other lints based on privacy (dead_code for example).
Closes#14421Closes#14422
This ensures that a public typedef to a private item is ensured to be public in
terms of linkage. This affects both the visibility of the library's symbols as
well as other lints based on privacy (dead_code for example).
Closes#14421Closes#14422
messages when the pattern is refutable.
This means the compiler points directly to the pattern and said that the
problem is the pattern being refutable (rather than just saying that
some value isn't covered in the `match` as it did previously).
Fixes#14390.
