Currently we have two files implementing bitsets (and 2D bit matrices).
This commit combines them into one, taking the best features from each.
This involves renaming a lot of things. The high level changes are as
follows.
- bitvec.rs --> bit_set.rs
- indexed_set.rs --> (removed)
- BitArray + IdxSet --> BitSet (merged, see below)
- BitVector --> GrowableBitSet
- {,Sparse,Hybrid}IdxSet --> {,Sparse,Hybrid}BitSet
- BitMatrix --> BitMatrix
- SparseBitMatrix --> SparseBitMatrix
The changes within the bitset types themselves are as follows.
```
OLD OLD NEW
BitArray<C> IdxSet<T> BitSet<T>
-------- ------ ------
grow - grow
new - (remove)
new_empty new_empty new_empty
new_filled new_filled new_filled
- to_hybrid to_hybrid
clear clear clear
set_up_to set_up_to set_up_to
clear_above - clear_above
count - count
contains(T) contains(&T) contains(T)
contains_all - superset
is_empty - is_empty
insert(T) add(&T) insert(T)
insert_all - insert_all()
remove(T) remove(&T) remove(T)
words words words
words_mut words_mut words_mut
- overwrite overwrite
merge union union
- subtract subtract
- intersect intersect
iter iter iter
```
In general, when choosing names I went with:
- names that are more obvious (e.g. `BitSet` over `IdxSet`).
- names that are more like the Rust libraries (e.g. `T` over `C`,
`insert` over `add`);
- names that are more set-like (e.g. `union` over `merge`, `superset`
over `contains_all`, `domain_size` over `num_bits`).
Also, using `T` for index arguments seems more sensible than `&T` --
even though the latter is standard in Rust collection types -- because
indices are always copyable. It also results in fewer `&` and `*`
sigils in practice.
Partial future-proofing for Box<T, A>
In some ways, this is similar to @eddyb's PR #47043 that went stale, but doesn't cover everything. Notably, this still leaves Box internalized as a pointer in places, so practically speaking, only ZSTs can be practically added to the Box type with the changes here (the compiler ICEs otherwise).
The Box type is not changed here, that's left for the future because I want to test that further first, but this puts things in place in a way that hopefully will make things easier.
Currently, MIR just passes the raw Box to box_free(), which happens to
work because practically, it's the same thing. But that might not be
true in the future, with Box<T, A: Alloc>.
The MIR inline pass actually fixes up the argument while inlining
box_free, but this is not enabled by default and doesn't necessarily
happen (the inline threshold needs to be passed).
This change effectively moves what the MIR inline pass does to the
elaborate_drops pass, so that box_free() is passed the raw pointer
instead of the Box.
[NLL] Add false edges out of infinite loops
Resolves#46036 by adding a `cleanup` member to the `FalseEdges` terminator kind. There's also a small doc fix to one of the other comments in `into.rs` which I can pull out in to another PR if desired =)
This PR should pass CI but the test suite has been relatively unstable on my system so I'm not 100% sure.
r? @nikomatsakis
Sometimes a simple goto misses the cleanup/unwind edges. Specifically, in the
case of infinite loops such as those introduced by a loop statement without any
other out edges. Analogous to TerminatorKind::FalseEdges; this new terminator
kind is used when we want borrowck to consider an unwind path, but real control
flow should never actually take it.
move closure kind, signature into `ClosureSubsts`
Instead of using side-tables, store the closure-kind and signature in the substitutions themselves. This has two key effects:
- It means that the closure's type changes as inference finds out more things, which is very nice.
- As a result, it avoids the need for the `freshen_closure_like` code (though we still use it for generators).
- It avoids cyclic closures calls.
- These were never meant to be supported, precisely because they make a lot of the fancy inference that we do much more complicated. However, due to an oversight, it was previously possible -- if challenging -- to create a setup where a closure *directly* called itself (see e.g. #21410).
We have to see what the effect of this change is, though. Needs a crater run. Marking as [WIP] until that has been assessed.
r? @arielb1
Migrate a slew of metadata methods to queries
This PR intends to make more progress on #41417, knocking off some low-hanging fruit.
Closes#44190
cc #44137
This commit moves the calculation of the `LanguageItems` structure into a
query rather than being calculated before the `TyCtxt` exists, with the eventual
end goal of removing some `CrateStore` methods.
Use the trait-environment+type as the key. Note that these
are only invoked on types that live for the entire compilation
(no inference artifacts). We no longer need the various special-case
bits and caches that were in place before.
The new setup is as follows. There is a pipeline of MIR passes that each
run **per def-id** to optimize a particular function. You are intended
to request MIR at whatever stage you need it. At the moment, there is
only one stage you can request:
- `optimized_mir(def_id)`
This yields the final product. Internally, it pulls the MIR for the
given def-id through a series of steps. Right now, these are still using
an "interned ref-cell" but they are intended to "steal" from one
another:
- `mir_build` -- performs the initial construction for local MIR
- `mir_pass_set` -- performs a suite of optimizations and transformations
- `mir_pass` -- an individual optimization within a suite
So, to construct the optimized MIR, we invoke:
mir_pass_set((MIR_OPTIMIZED, def_id))
which will build up the final MIR.
Overall goal: reduce the amount of context a mir pass needs so that it
resembles a query.
- The hooks are no longer "threaded down" to the pass, but rather run
automatically from the top-level (we also thread down the current pass
number, so that the files are sorted better).
- The hook now receives a *single* callback, rather than a callback per-MIR.
- The traits are no longer lifetime parameters, which moved to the
methods -- given that we required
`for<'tcx>` objecs, there wasn't much point to that.
- Several passes now store a `String` instead of a `&'l str` (again, no
point).
