Change `bytes!()` to return
{
static BYTES: &'static [u8] = &[...];
BYTES
}
This gives it the `'static` lifetime, whereas before it had an rvalue
lifetime. Until recently this would have prevented assigning `bytes!()`
to a static, as in
static FOO: &'static [u8] = bytes!(1,2,3);
but #14183 fixed it so blocks are now allowed in constant expressions
(with restrictions).
Fixes#11641.
Change `bytes!()` to return
{
static BYTES: &'static [u8] = &[...];
BYTES
}
This gives it the `'static` lifetime, whereas before it had an rvalue
lifetime. Until recently this would have prevented assigning `bytes!()`
to a static, as in
static FOO: &'static [u8] = bytes!(1,2,3);
but #14183 fixed it so blocks are now allowed in constant expressions
(with restrictions).
Fixes#11641.
This commit fills in the documentation holes for the FormatWriter trait which
were previously accidentally left blank. Additionally, this adds the `write_fmt`
method to the trait to allow usage of the `write!` macro with implementors of
the `FormatWriter` trait. This is not useful for consumers of the standard
library who should generally avoid the `FormatWriter` trait, but it is useful
for consumers of the core library who are not using the standard library.
This slightly adjusts the NullablePointer representation for some enums in the case where the non-nullable variant has a single field (the ptr field) to be just that, the pointer. This is in contrast to the current behaviour where we'd wrap that single pointer in a LLVM struct.
Fixes#11040 & #11303.
This commit fills in the documentation holes for the FormatWriter trait which
were previously accidentally left blank. Additionally, this adds the `write_fmt`
method to the trait to allow usage of the `write!` macro with implementors of
the `FormatWriter` trait. This is not useful for consumers of the standard
library who should generally avoid the `FormatWriter` trait, but it is useful
for consumers of the core library who are not using the standard library.
This commit is part of the libstd facade RFC, issue #13851. This creates a new
library, liballoc, which is intended to be the core allocation library for all
of Rust. It is pinned on the basic assumption that an allocation failure is an
abort or failure.
This module has inherited the heap/libc_heap modules from std::rt, the owned/rc
modules from std, and the arc module from libsync. These three pointers are
currently the three most core pointer implementations in Rust.
The UnsafeArc type in std::sync should be considered deprecated and replaced by
`Arc<Unsafe<T>>`. This commit does not currently migrate to this type, but future
commits will continue this refactoring.
This commit is part of the libstd facade RFC, issue #13851. This creates a new
library, liballoc, which is intended to be the core allocation library for all
of Rust. It is pinned on the basic assumption that an allocation failure is an
abort or failure.
This module has inherited the heap/libc_heap modules from std::rt, the owned/rc
modules from std, and the arc module from libsync. These three pointers are
currently the three most core pointer implementations in Rust.
The UnsafeArc type in std::sync should be considered deprecated and replaced by
Arc<Unsafe<T>>. This commit does not currently migrate to this type, but future
commits will continue this refactoring.
This plugs a leak where resolve was treating enums defined in parent modules as
in-scope for all children modules when resolving a pattern identifier. This
eliminates the code path in resolve entirely.
If this breaks any existing code, then it indicates that the variants need to be
explicitly imported into the module.
Closes#14221
This is an implementation of RFC 16. A module can now only be loaded if the
module declaring `mod name;` "owns" the current directory. A module is
considered as owning its directory if it meets one of the following criteria:
* It is the top-level crate file
* It is a `mod.rs` file
* It was loaded via `#[path]`
* It was loaded via `include!`
* The module was declared via an inline `mod foo { ... }` statement
For example, this directory structure is now invalid
// lib.rs
mod foo;
// foo.rs
mod bar;
// bar.rs;
fn bar() {}
With this change `foo.rs` must be renamed to `foo/mod.rs`, and `bar.rs` must be
renamed to `foo/bar.rs`. This makes it clear that `bar` is a submodule of `foo`,
and can only be accessed through `foo`.
RFC: 0016-module-file-system-hierarchy
Closes#14180
[breaking-change]
Use sync:1️⃣:Once to fetch the mach_timebase_info only once when
running precise_time_ns(). This helps because mach_timebase_info() is
surprisingly inefficient. Also fix the order of operations when applying
the timebase to the mach absolute time value.
This improves the time on my machine from
```
test tests::bench_precise_time_ns ... bench: 157 ns/iter (+/- 4)
```
to
```
test tests::bench_precise_time_ns ... bench: 38 ns/iter (+/- 3)
```
and it will get even faster once #14174 lands.
This plugs a leak where resolve was treating enums defined in parent modules as
in-scope for all children modules when resolving a pattern identifier. This
eliminates the code path in resolve entirely.
If this breaks any existing code, then it indicates that the variants need to be
explicitly imported into the module.
Closes#14221
[breaking-change]
This changes the previously naive string searching algorithm to a two-way search like glibc, which should be faster on average while still maintaining worst case linear time complexity. This fixes#14107. Note that I don't think this should be merged yet, as this is the only approach to speeding up search I've tried - it's worth considering options like Boyer-Moore or adding a bad character shift table to this. However, the benchmarks look quite good so far:
test str::bench::bench_contains_bad_naive ... bench: 290 ns/iter (+/- 12) from 1309 ns/iter (+/- 36)
test str::bench::bench_contains_equal ... bench: 479 ns/iter (+/- 10) from 137 ns/iter (+/- 2)
test str::bench::bench_contains_short_long ... bench: 2844 ns/iter (+/- 105) from 5473 ns/iter (+/- 14)
test str::bench::bench_contains_short_short ... bench: 55 ns/iter (+/- 4) from 57 ns/iter (+/- 6)
Except for the case specifically designed to be optimal for the naive case (`bench_contains_equal`), this gets as good or better performance as the previous code.
Use sync:1️⃣:Once to fetch the mach_timebase_info only once when
running precise_time_ns(). This helps because mach_timebase_info() is
surprisingly inefficient. Also fix the order of operations when applying
the timebase to the mach absolute time value.
This improves the time on my machine from
```
test tests::bench_precise_time_ns ... bench: 157 ns/iter (+/- 4)
```
to
```
test tests::bench_precise_time_ns ... bench: 38 ns/iter (+/- 3)
```
and it will get even faster once #14174 lands.
