rewrite error handling for unresolved inference vars
Pretty much completely rewrites `fn emit_inference_failure_err`.
This new setup should hopefully be easier to extend and is already a lot better when looking for generic arguments.
Because this is a rewrite there are still some parts which are lacking, these are tracked in #94483 and will be fixed in later PRs.
r? `@estebank` `@petrochenkov`
Add new lint `mismatching_type_param_order`
changelog: Add new lint [`mismatching_type_param_order`] for checking if type parameters are consistent between type definitions and impl blocks.
fixes#7147
On E0204 suggest missing type param bounds
```
error[E0204]: the trait `Copy` may not be implemented for this type
--> f42.rs:9:17
|
9 | #[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone)]
| ^^^^
10 | pub struct AABB<K>{
11 | pub loc: Vector2<K>,
| ------------------- this field does not implement `Copy`
12 | pub size: Vector2<K>
| -------------------- this field does not implement `Copy`
|
note: the `Copy` impl for `Vector2<K>` requires that `K: Debug`
--> f42.rs:11:5
|
11 | pub loc: Vector2<K>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: the `Copy` impl for `Vector2<K>` requires that `K: Debug`
--> f42.rs:12:5
|
12 | pub size: Vector2<K>
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Copy` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: consider restricting type parameter `K`
|
10 | pub struct AABB<K: Debug>{
| +++++++
```
Fix#89137.
take back half-baked noaliasing check in Assignment
Doing an aliasing check in `copy_op` does not make a ton of sense. We have to eventually do something in the `Assignment` statement handling instead.
Stabilize `{slice,array}::from_ref`
This PR stabilizes the following APIs as `const` functions in Rust `1.63`:
```rust
// core::array
pub const fn from_ref<T>(s: &T) -> &[T; 1];
// core::slice
pub const fn from_ref<T>(s: &T) -> &[T];
```
Note that the `mut` versions are not stabilized as unique references (`&mut _`) are [unstable in const context].
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90206#issuecomment-1134586665
r? rust-lang/libs-api `@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
[unstable in const context]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349
Remove label/lifetime shadowing warnings
This PR removes some pre-1.0 shadowing warnings for labels and lifetimes.
The current behaviour of the compiler is to warn
* labels that shadow unrelated labels in the same function --> removed
```rust
'a: loop {}
'a: loop {} // STOP WARNING
```
* labels that shadow enclosing labels --> kept, but only if shadowing is hygienic
```rust
'a: loop {
'a: loop {} // KEEP WARNING
}
```
* labels that shadow lifetime --> removed
```rust
fn foo<'a>() {
'a: loop {} // STOP WARNING
}
```
* lifetimes that shadow labels --> removed
```rust
'a: loop {
let b = Box::new(|x: &i8| *x) as Box<dyn for <'a> Fn(&'a i8) -> i8>; // STOP WARNING
}
```
* lifetimes that shadow lifetimes --> kept
```rust
fn foo<'a>() {
let b = Box::new(|x: &i8| *x) as Box<dyn for <'a> Fn(&'a i8) -> i8>; // KEEP WARNING
}
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31745.
-----
From `@petrochenkov` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95781#issuecomment-1105199014
> I think we should remove these silly checks entirely.
> They were introduced long time ago in case some new language features appear and require this space.
> Now we have another mechanism for such language changes - editions, and if "lifetimes in expressions" or something like that needs to be introduced it could be introduced as an edition change.
> However, there was no plans to introduce anything like for years, so it's unlikely that even the edition mechanism will be necessary.
r? rust-lang/lang
Improve documentation for constructors of pinned `Box`es
Adds a cross-references between `Box::pin` and `Box::into_pin` (and other related methods, i.e. the equivalent `From` implementation, and the unstable `pin_in` method), in particular now that `into_pin` [was stabilized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97397). The main goal is to further improve visibility of the fact that `Box<T> -> Pin<Box<T>>` conversion exits in the first place, and that `Box::pin(x)` is – essentially – just a convenience function for `Box::into_pin(Box::new(x))`
The motivating context why I think this is important is even experienced Rust users overlooking the existence this kind of conversion, [e.g. in this thread on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-function-variants/16732/7?u=steffahn); and also the fact that that discussion brought up that there would be a bunch of Box-construction methods "missing" such as e.g. methods with fallible allocation a la "`Box::try_pin`", and similar; while those are in fact *not* necessary, because you can use `Box::into_pin(Box::try_new(x)?)` instead.
I have *not* included explicit mention of methods (e.g. `try_new`) in the docs of stable methods (e.g. `into_pin`). (Referring to unstable API in stable API docs would be bad style IMO.) Stable examples I have in mind with the statement "constructing a (pinned) Box in a different way than with `Box::new`" are things like cloning a `Box`, or `Box::from_raw`. If/when `try_new` would get stabilized, it would become a very good concrete example use-case of `Box::into_pin` IMO.
don't use a `span_note` for ignored impls
Searching for the `derive` isn't too difficult as it's right above the field definition.
By using a span these errors are a lot more verbose than they should be, which is especially annoying as one can end up with a lot of `dead_code` warnings.
```
error[E0204]: the trait `Copy` may not be implemented for this type
--> f42.rs:9:17
|
9 | #[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone)]
| ^^^^
10 | pub struct AABB<K>{
11 | pub loc: Vector2<K>,
| ------------------- this field does not implement `Copy`
12 | pub size: Vector2<K>
| -------------------- this field does not implement `Copy`
|
note: the `Copy` impl for `Vector2<K>` requires that `K: Debug`
--> f42.rs:11:5
|
11 | pub loc: Vector2<K>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: the `Copy` impl for `Vector2<K>` requires that `K: Debug`
--> f42.rs:12:5
|
12 | pub size: Vector2<K>
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Copy` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: consider restricting type parameter `K`
|
10 | pub struct AABB<K: Debug>{
| +++++++
```
Fix#89137.
Lazify `SourceFile::lines`.
`SourceFile::lines` is a big part of metadata. It's stored in a compressed form
(a difference list) to save disk space. Decoding it is a big fraction of
compile time for very small crates/programs.
This commit introduces a new type `SourceFileLines` which has a `Lines`
form and a `Diffs` form. The latter is used when the metadata is first
read, and it is only decoded into the `Lines` form when line data is
actually needed. This avoids the decoding cost for many files,
especially in `std`. It's a performance win of up to 15% for tiny
crates/programs where metadata decoding is a high part of compilation
costs.
A `RefCell` is needed because the methods that access lines data (which can
trigger decoding) take `&self` rather than `&mut self`. To allow for this,
`SourceFile::lines` now takes a `FnMut` that operates on the lines slice rather
than returning the lines slice.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
