Update cargo
17 commits in 64fb38c97ac4d3a327fc9032c862dd28c8833b17..f7b95e31642e09c2b6eabb18ed75007dda6677a0
2023-05-23 18:53:23 +0000 to 2023-05-30 19:25:02 +0000
- chore: detect the channel a PR wants to merge into (rust-lang/cargo#12181)
- refactor: de-depulicate `make_dep_prefix` implementation (rust-lang/cargo#12203)
- Re-enable code_generation test on Windows (rust-lang/cargo#12199)
- docs: add doc comments for git source and friends (rust-lang/cargo#12192)
- test: set retry sleep to 1ms for all tests (rust-lang/cargo#12194)
- fix(add): Reduce the chance we re-format the user's `[features]` table (rust-lang/cargo#12191)
- test(add): Remove expensive test (rust-lang/cargo#12188)
- Add a description of `Cargo.lock` conflicts in the Cargo FAQ (rust-lang/cargo#12185)
- refactor(tests): Reduce cargo-add setup load (rust-lang/cargo#12189)
- Warn when an edition 2021 crate is in a virtual workspace with default resolver (rust-lang/cargo#10910)
- refactor(tests): Reduce cargo-remove setup load (rust-lang/cargo#12184)
- chore: Lexicographically order `-Z` flags (rust-lang/cargo#12182)
- chore(ci): remove temporary fix for rustup 1.24.1 (rust-lang/cargo#12180)
- fix: AIX searches dynamic libraries in `LIBPATH`. (rust-lang/cargo#11968)
- deps: remove unused features from windows-sys (rust-lang/cargo#12176)
- Automatically inherit workspace lints when running cargo new/init (rust-lang/cargo#12174)
- Test that the new `debuginfo` options match between cargo and rustc (rust-lang/cargo#12022)
r? `@ghost`
change `BorrowKind::Unique` to be a mutating `PlaceContext`
fixes#112056
I believe that `BorrowKind::Unique` is a footgun in general, so I added a FIXME and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112072. This is a bit too involved for this PR though.
Allow limited access to `OsStr` bytes
`OsStr` has historically kept its implementation details private out of
concern for locking us into a specific encoding on Windows.
This is an alternative to rust-lang#95290 which proposed specifying the encoding on Windows. Instead, this
only specifies that for cross-platform code, `OsStr`'s encoding is a superset of UTF-8 and defines
rules for safely interacting with it
At minimum, this can greatly simplify the `os_str_bytes` crate and every
arg parser that interacts with `OsStr` directly (which is most of those
that support invalid UTF-8).
Tracking issue: #111544
refactor and cleanup the leak check, add it to new solver
ended up being a bit more involved than I wanted but is hopefully still easy enough to review as a single PR, can split it into separate ones otherwise.
this can be reviewed commit by commit:
a473d55cdb9284aa2b01282d1b529a2a4d26547b 31a686646534ca006d906ec757ece4e771d6f973 949039c107852a5e36361c08b62821a0613656f5 242917bf5170d9a723c6c8e23e9d9d0c2fa8dc9d ed2b25a7aa28be3184be9e3022c2796a30eaad87 are all pretty straightforward.
03dd83b4c3f4ff27558f5c8ab859bd9f83db1d04 makes it easier to refactor coherence in a later commit, see the commit description, cc `@oli-obk`
4fe311d807a77b6270f384e41689bf5d58f46aec I don't quite remember what we wanted to test here, this definitely doesn't test that the occurs check doesn't cause incorrect errors in coherence, also cc `@oli-obk` here. I may end up writing a new test for this myself later.
5c200d88a91b75bd0875b973150655bd581ef97a is the main refactor of the leak check, changing it to take the `outer_universe` instead of getting it from a snapshot. Using a snapshot requires us to be in a probe which we aren't in the new solver, it also just feels dirty as snapshots don't really have anything to do with universes.
with all of this cfc230d54188d9c7ed867a9a0d1f51be77b485f9 is now kind of trivial.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Don't typecheck recovered method call from suggestion
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not double down and use the recovered type to perform method call typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics relevant for the *fixed* code.
### Code Sample
```rust
struct Client;
impl Client {
fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
}
fn f() {
let c = Client;
post(c, ());
}
```
### Before This PR
```
error[[E0277]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0277.html): cannot add `()` to `()`
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ no implementation for `() + ()`
|
= help: the trait `Add` is not implemented for `()`
note: required by a bound in `Client::post`
--> src/lib.rs:4:16
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Client::post`
error[[E0061]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0061.html): this function takes 2 arguments but 1 argument was supplied
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ an argument of type `()` is missing
|
note: method defined here
--> src/lib.rs:4:8
|
4 | fn post<T: std::ops::Add>(&self, _: T, _: T) {}
| ^^^^ ----- ---- ----
help: provide the argument
|
9 | post((), ())(c, ());
| ++++++++
error[[E0425]](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/error_codes/E0425.html): cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> src/lib.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0061, E0277, E0425.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0061`.
```
### After This PR
```
error[E0425]: cannot find function `post` in this scope
--> tests/ui/typeck/issue-106929.rs:9:5
|
9 | post(c, ());
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: use the `.` operator to call the method `post` on `&Client`
|
9 - post(c, ());
9 + c.post(());
|
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
```
Fixes#106929.
`EarlyBinder::new` -> `EarlyBinder::bind`
for consistency with `Binder::bind`. it may make sense to also add `EarlyBinder::dummy` in places where we know that no parameters exist, but I left that out of this PR.
r? `@jackh726` `@kylematsuda`
bootstrap: Various Step refactors
This ended up being a bunch of only somewhat related changes, sorry 😓 on the bright side, they're all fairly small and well-commented in the commit messages.
- Document `ShouldRun::crates`
- Switch Steps from crates to crate_or_deps where possible
and document why the single remaining place can't switch
- Switch doc::{Std, Rustc} to `crate_or_deps`
Previously they were using `all_krates` and various hacks to determine
which crates to document. Switch them to `crate_or_deps` so `ShouldRun`
tells them which crate to document instead of having to guess.
This also makes a few other refactors:
- Remove the now unused `all_krates`; new code should only use
`crate_or_deps`.
- Add tests for documenting Std
- Remove the unnecessary `run_cargo_rustdoc_for` closure so that we only
run cargo once
- Give a more helpful error message when documenting a no_std target
- Use `builder.msg` in the Steps instead of `builder.info`
- Extend `msg` and `description` to work with any subcommand
Previously `description` only supported `Testing` and `Benchmarking`,
and `msg` gave weird results for `doc` (it would say `Docing`).
- Add a `make_run_crates` function and use it Rustc and Std
This fixes the panic from the previous commit.
- Allow checking individual crates
This is useful for profiling metadata generation.
This comes very close to removing all_krates, but doesn't quite -
there's one last usage left in `doc`. This is fixed in a later commit.
- Give a more helpful error when calling `cargo_crates_in_set` for an alias
Before:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'no entry found for key', builder.rs:110:30
```
After:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'missing crate for path library', check.rs:89:26
```
fix: dedup `static_candidates` before report
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103646
`record_static_candidate` had been executed twice, resulting in the presence of two identical `CandidateSource::Trait(Cat)` in static_candidates. This PR aims to deduplication the `static_candidates` list, allowing it to execute `suggest_associated_call_syntax` properly.
Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.
## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`
(deny-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```
### Explanation
Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.
## `invalid_from_utf8`
(warn-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```
### Explanation
Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
````@rustbot```` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
we can otherwise assign a hidden type to the opaque which
causes ICE if we don't use `take_opaque_types` during
coherence. This is annoying so I didn't bother. Added a test
showing the behavior this prevents.
Optimize scalar and scalar pair representations loaded from ByRef in llvm
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 I noticed that we were generating suboptimal LLVM IR if we had a `ConstValue::ByRef` that could be represented by a `ScalarPair`. Before https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105653 this is probably rare, but after it, every slice will go down this suboptimal code path that requires LLVM to untangle a bunch of indirections and translate static allocations that are only used once to read a scalar pair from.
Only make the use-dot-operator-to-call-method suggestion, but do not
double down and use the recovered type to perform method call
typechecking as it will produce confusing diagnostics on the "fixed"
code.
This option was introduced three years ago, but it's never been
meaningfully used, and `default` is the only acceptable value.
Also, I think the `Partition` trait presents an interface that is too
closely tied to the existing strategy and would probably be wrong for
other strategies. (My rule of thumb is to not make something generic
until there are at least two instances of it, to avoid this kind of
problem.)
Also, I don't think providing multiple partitioning strategies to the
user is a good idea, because the compiler already has enough obscure
knobs.
This commit removes the option, along with the `Partition` trait, and
the `Partitioner` and `DefaultPartitioning` types. I left the existing
code in `compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/partitioning/default.rs`,
though I could be persuaded that moving it into
`compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/partitioning/mod.rs` is better.
`[T; N]::zip` is "eager" but most zips are mapped.
This causes poor optimization in generated code.
This is a fundamental design issue and "zip" is
"prime real estate" in terms of function names,
so let's free it up again.
Make `TrustedStep` require `Copy`
All the implementations of the trait already are `Copy`, and this seems to be enough to simplify the implementations enough to make the MIR inliner willing to inline basics like `Range::next`.
r? `@thomcc`
