Add AST validation pass and move some checks to it
The purpose of this pass is to catch constructions that fit into AST data structures, but not permitted by the language. As an example, `impl`s don't have visibilities, but for convenience and uniformity with other items they are represented with a structure `Item` which has `Visibility` field.
This pass is intended to run after expansion of macros and syntax extensions (and before lowering to HIR), so it can catch erroneous constructions that were generated by them. This pass allows to remove ad hoc semantic checks from the parser, which can be overruled by syntax extensions and occasionally macros.
The checks can be put here if they are simple, local, don't require results of any complex analysis like name resolution or type checking and maybe don't logically fall into other passes. I expect most of errors generated by this pass to be non-fatal and allowing the compilation to proceed.
I intend to move some more checks to this pass later and maybe extend it with new checks, like, for example, identifier validity. Given that syntax extensions are going to be stabilized in the measurable future, it's important that they would not be able to subvert usual language rules.
In this patch I've added two new checks - a check for labels named `'static` and a check for lifetimes and labels named `'_`. The first one gives a hard error, the second one - a future compatibility warning.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/33059 ([breaking-change])
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1177
r? @nrc
rustbuild: Add support for crate tests + doctests
This commit adds support to rustbuild to run crate unit tests (those defined by
`#[test]`) as well as documentation tests. All tests are powered by `cargo test`
under the hood.
Each step requires the `libtest` library is built for that corresponding stage.
Ideally the `test` crate would be a dev-dependency, but for now it's just easier
to ensure that we sequence everything in the right order.
Currently no filtering is implemented, so there's not actually a method of
testing *only* libstd or *only* libcore, but rather entire swaths of crates are
tested all at once.
A few points of note here are:
* The `coretest` and `collectionstest` crates are just listed as `[[test]]`
entires for `cargo test` to naturally pick up. This mean that `cargo test -p
core` actually runs all the tests for libcore.
* Libraries that aren't tested all mention `test = false` in their `Cargo.toml`
* Crates aren't currently allowed to have dev-dependencies due to
rust-lang/cargo#860, but we can likely alleviate this restriction once
workspaces are implemented.
cc #31590
This commit adds support to rustbuild to run crate unit tests (those defined by
`#[test]`) as well as documentation tests. All tests are powered by `cargo test`
under the hood.
Each step requires the `libtest` library is built for that corresponding stage.
Ideally the `test` crate would be a dev-dependency, but for now it's just easier
to ensure that we sequence everything in the right order.
Currently no filtering is implemented, so there's not actually a method of
testing *only* libstd or *only* libcore, but rather entire swaths of crates are
tested all at once.
A few points of note here are:
* The `coretest` and `collectionstest` crates are just listed as `[[test]]`
entires for `cargo test` to naturally pick up. This mean that `cargo test -p
core` actually runs all the tests for libcore.
* Libraries that aren't tested all mention `test = false` in their `Cargo.toml`
* Crates aren't currently allowed to have dev-dependencies due to
rust-lang/cargo#860, but we can likely alleviate this restriction once
workspaces are implemented.
cc #31590
The extra filename and line was mainly there to keep the indentation
relative to the main snippet; now that this doesn't include
filename/line-number as a prefix, it is distracted.
This commit applies all stabilizations, renamings, and deprecations that the
library team has decided on for the upcoming 1.9 release. All tracking issues
have gone through a cycle-long "final comment period" and the specific APIs
stabilized/deprecated are:
Stable
* `std::panic`
* `std::panic::catch_unwind` (renamed from `recover`)
* `std::panic::resume_unwind` (renamed from `propagate`)
* `std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe` (renamed from `AssertRecoverSafe`)
* `std::panic::UnwindSafe` (renamed from `RecoverSafe`)
* `str::is_char_boundary`
* `<*const T>::as_ref`
* `<*mut T>::as_ref`
* `<*mut T>::as_mut`
* `AsciiExt::make_ascii_uppercase`
* `AsciiExt::make_ascii_lowercase`
* `char::decode_utf16`
* `char::DecodeUtf16`
* `char::DecodeUtf16Error`
* `char::DecodeUtf16Error::unpaired_surrogate`
* `BTreeSet::take`
* `BTreeSet::replace`
* `BTreeSet::get`
* `HashSet::take`
* `HashSet::replace`
* `HashSet::get`
* `OsString::with_capacity`
* `OsString::clear`
* `OsString::capacity`
* `OsString::reserve`
* `OsString::reserve_exact`
* `OsStr::is_empty`
* `OsStr::len`
* `std::os::unix::thread`
* `RawPthread`
* `JoinHandleExt`
* `JoinHandleExt::as_pthread_t`
* `JoinHandleExt::into_pthread_t`
* `HashSet::hasher`
* `HashMap::hasher`
* `CommandExt::exec`
* `File::try_clone`
* `SocketAddr::set_ip`
* `SocketAddr::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV4::set_ip`
* `SocketAddrV4::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_ip`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_port`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_flowinfo`
* `SocketAddrV6::set_scope_id`
* `<[T]>::copy_from_slice`
* `ptr::read_volatile`
* `ptr::write_volatile`
* The `#[deprecated]` attribute
* `OpenOptions::create_new`
Deprecated
* `std::raw::Slice` - use raw parts of `slice` module instead
* `std::raw::Repr` - use raw parts of `slice` module instead
* `str::char_range_at` - use slicing plus `chars()` plus `len_utf8`
* `str::char_range_at_reverse` - use slicing plus `chars().rev()` plus `len_utf8`
* `str::char_at` - use slicing plus `chars()`
* `str::char_at_reverse` - use slicing plus `chars().rev()`
* `str::slice_shift_char` - use `chars()` plus `Chars::as_str`
* `CommandExt::session_leader` - use `before_exec` instead.
Closes#27719
cc #27751 (deprecating the `Slice` bits)
Closes#27754Closes#27780Closes#27809Closes#27811Closes#27830Closes#28050Closes#29453Closes#29791Closes#29935Closes#30014Closes#30752Closes#31262
cc #31398 (still need to deal with `before_exec`)
Closes#31405Closes#31572Closes#31755Closes#31756
Fix issue: Global paths in `use` directives can begin with `super` or `self` #32225
This PR fixes#32225 by warning on `use ::super::...` and `use ::self::...` on `resolve`.
Current changes is the most minimal and ad-hoc.
This is a [breaking-change]: according to RFC #1445, constants used as
patterns must be of a type that *derives* `Eq`. If you encounter a
problem, you are most likely using a constant in an expression where the
type of the constant is some struct that does not currently implement
`Eq`. Something like the following:
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
The easiest and most future compatible fix is to annotate the type in
question with `#[derive(Eq)]` (note that merely *implementing* `Eq` is
not enough, it must be *derived*):
```rust
struct SomeType { ... }
const SOME_CONST: SomeType = ...;
match foo {
SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Another good option is to rewrite the match arm to use an `if`
condition (this is also particularly good for floating point types,
which implement `PartialEq` but not `Eq`):
```rust
match foo {
c if c == SOME_CONST => ...
}
```
Finally, a third alternative is to tag the type with
`#[structural_match]`; but this is not recommended, as the attribute is
never expected to be stabilized. Please see RFC #1445 for more details.
There's a lot of stuff wrong with the representation of these types:
TyFnDef doesn't actually uniquely identify a function, TyFnPtr is used to
represent method calls, TyFnDef in the sub-expression of a cast isn't
correctly reified, and probably some other stuff I haven't discovered yet.
Splitting them seems like the right first step, though.
