In some cases, we emit borrowcheck diagnostics pointing
at a particular field expression in a struct expression
(e.g. `MyStruct { field: my_expr }`). However, this
behavior currently relies on us choosing the
`ConstraintCategory::Boring` with the 'correct' span.
When adding additional variants to `ConstraintCategory`,
(or changing existing usages away from `ConstraintCategory::Boring`),
the current behavior can easily get broken, since a non-boring
constraint will get chosen over a boring one.
To make the diagnostic output less fragile, this commit
adds a `ConstraintCategory::Usage` variant. We use this variant
for the temporary assignments created for each field of
an aggregate we are constructing.
Using this new variant, we can emit a message mentioning
"this usage", emphasizing the fact that the error message
is related to the specific use site (in the struct expression).
This is preparation for additional work on improving NLL error messages
(see #57374)
Disable RemoveZsts in generators to avoid query cycles
Querying layout of a generator requires its optimized MIR. Thus
computing layout during MIR optimization of a generator might create a
query cycle. Disable RemoveZsts in generators to avoid the issue
(similar approach is used in ConstProp transform already).
Fixes#88972.
Change ab41eef9aca3 in LLVM split MemorySanitizerPass into
MemorySanitizerPass for functions and ModuleMemorySanitizerPass for
modules. There's a related change for ThreadSanitizerPass, and in here
since we're using a ModulePassManager I only add the module flavor of
the pass on LLVM 14.
r? @nikic cc @nagisa
When evaluating an `ExprKind::Call`, we first have to `check_expr` on it's
callee. When this one is a `ExprKind::Path`, we had to evaluate the bounds
introduced for its arguments, but by the time we evaluated them we no
longer had access to the argument spans. Now we special case this so
that we can point at the right place on unsatisfied bounds. This also
allows the E0277 deduplication to kick in correctly, so we now emit
fewer errors.
When giving an error about an obligation introduced by a function call
that an argument doesn't fulfill, and that argument is a block, add a
span_label pointing at the innermost tail expression.
Move the information about pointing at the call argument expression in
an unmet obligation span from the `FulfillmentError` to a new
`ObligationCauseCode`.
Add non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns lint related to rfc-2008-non_exhaustive
Fixes: #84332
This PR adds `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns`, an allow by default lint that is triggered when a `non_exhaustive` type is missing explicit patterns. The warning or deny attribute can be put above the wildcard `_` pattern on enums or on the expression for enums or structs. The lint is capable of warning about multiple types within the same pattern. This lint will not be triggered for `if let ..` patterns.
```rust
// crate A
#[non_exhaustive]
pub struct Foo {
a: u8,
b: usize,
}
#[non_exhaustive]
pub enum Bar {
A(Foo),
B,
}
// crate B
#[deny(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)] // here
match Bar::B {
Bar::B => {}
#[deny(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)] // or here
_ => {}
}
#[warn(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)] // only here
let Foo { a, .. } = Foo::default();
#[deny(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)]
match Bar::B {
// triggers for Bar::B, and Foo.b
Bar::A(Foo { a, .. }) => {}
// if the attribute was here only Bar::B would cause a warning
_ => {}
}
```
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #87320 (Introduce -Z remap-cwd-prefix switch)
- #88690 (Accept `m!{ .. }.method()` and `m!{ .. }?` statements. )
- #88775 (Revert anon union parsing)
- #88841 (feat(rustc_typeck): suggest removing bad parens in `(recv.method)()`)
- #88907 (Highlight the `const fn` if error happened because of a bound on the impl block)
- #88915 (`Wrapping<T>` has the same layout and ABI as `T`)
- #88933 (Remove implementation of `min_align_of` intrinsic)
- #88951 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
When a macro is used in the trailing expression position of a block
(e.g. `fn foo() { my_macro!() }`), we currently parse it as an
expression, rather than a statement. As a result, we ended up
using the `NodeId` of the containing statement as our `lint_node_id`,
even though we don't normally do this for macro calls.
If such a macro expands to an expression with a `#[cfg]` attribute,
then the trailing statement can get removed entirely. This lead to
an ICE, since we were usng the `NodeId` of the expression to emit
a lint.
Ths commit makes us skip updating `lint_node_id` when handling
a macro in trailing expression position. This will cause us to
lint at the closest parent of the macro call.
It's possible to use the same `InferCtxt` with both
an intercrate and non-intercrate `SelectionContext`. However,
the local (inferctxt) evaluation cache is not aware of this
distinction, so this kind of `InferCtxt` re-use will pollute
the cache wth bad results.
This commit avoids the issue by disabling the evaluation cache
entirely during intercrate mode.
Disable validate_maintainers.
The validate_maintainers check has started to fail with the error:
```
HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
b'{"message":"Must have admin access to view repository collaborators.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/repos#list-repository-collaborators"}'
```
Apparently GitHub has restricted the collaborators API to admins. For now, this just disables the check to get CI working again. Eventually, I think we'll just need to remove the check since we will unlikely use an admin token, and I don't see a workaround. The `MAINTAINERS` list doesn't change often, so we may just need to put a sternly worded comment near the list.
Highlight the `const fn` if error happened because of a bound on the impl block
Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the
following:
```rust
struct Type<T>(T);
impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
const fn f() {}
}
```
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions "const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl.
This PR adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following:
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
4 | pub const fn f() {}
| ---------------- function declared as const here
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
---
I've originally wanted to point directly to `const` token, but couldn't find a way to get it's span. It seems like this span is lost during the AST -> HIR lowering.
Also, since the errors for object casts in `const fn`s (`&T` -> `&dyn Trait`) seem to trigger the same error, this PR accidentally changes these errors too. Not sure if it's desired or how to fix this.
P.S. it's my first time contributing to diagnostics, so feedback is very appreciated!
---
r? ```@estebank```
```@rustbot``` label: +A-diagnostics
Revert anon union parsing
Revert PR #84571 and #85515, which implemented anonymous union parsing in a manner that broke the context-sensitivity for the `union` keyword and thus broke stable Rust code.
Fix#88583.
Accept `m!{ .. }.method()` and `m!{ .. }?` statements.
This PR fixes something that I keep running into when using `quote!{}.into()` in a proc macro to convert the `proc_macro2::TokenStream` to a `proc_macro::TokenStream`:
Before:
```
error: expected expression, found `.`
--> src/lib.rs:6:6
|
4 | quote! {
5 | ...
6 | }.into()
| ^ expected expression
```
After:
```
```
(No output, compiles fine.)
---
Context:
For expressions like `{ 1 }` and `if true { 1 } else { 2 }`, we accept them as full statements without a trailing `;`, which means the following is not accepted:
```rust
{ 1 } - 1 // error
```
since that is parsed as two statements: `{ 1 }` and `-1`. Syntactically correct, but the type of `{ 1 }` should be `()` as there is no `;`.
However, for specifically `.` and `?` after the `}`, we do [continue parsing it as an expression](13db8440bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L864-L876)):
```rust
{ "abc" }.len(); // ok
```
For braced macro invocations, we do not do this:
```rust
vec![1, 2, 3].len(); // ok
vec!{1, 2, 3}.len(); // error
```
(It parses `vec!{1, 2, 3}` as a full statement, and then complains about `.len()` not being a valid expression.)
This PR changes this to also look for a `.` and `?` after a braced macro invocation. We can be sure the macro is an expression and not a full statement in those cases, since no statement can start with a `.` or `?`.
Introduce -Z remap-cwd-prefix switch
This switch remaps any absolute paths rooted under the current
working directory to a new value. This includes remapping the
debug info in `DW_AT_comp_dir` and `DW_AT_decl_file`.
Importantly, this flag does not require passing the current working
directory to the compiler, such that the command line can be
run on any machine (with the same input files) and produce the
same results. This is critical property for debugging compiler
issues that crop up on remote machines.
This is based on adetaylor's dbc4ae7cba
Major Change Proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/450
Discussed on #38322. Would resolve issue #87325.
Specify a log level in tracing instrument macro explicitly.
Additionally reduce the used log level from a default info level to a
debug level (all of those appear to be developer oriented logs, so there
should be no need to include them in release builds).
