Remove the remains of query categories
Back in October 2020 in #77830 ``@cjgillot`` removed the query categories information from the profiler, but the actual definitions which query was in which category remained, although unused.
Here I clean that up, to simplify the query definitions even further.
It's unfortunate that this loses all the context for `git blame`, ~~but I'm working on moving those query definitions into `rustc_query_system`, which will lose that context anyway.~~ EDIT: Might not work out.
The functional changes are in the first commit. The second one only changes the indentation.
Improve handling of spans around macro result parse errors
Fixes#81543
After we expand a macro, we try to parse the resulting tokens as a AST
node. This commit makes several improvements to how we handle spans when
an error occurs:
* Only ovewrite the original `Span` if it's a dummy span. This preserves
a more-specific span if one is available.
* Use `self.prev_token` instead of `self.token` when emitting an error
message after encountering EOF, since an EOF token always has a dummy
span
* Make `SourceMap::next_point` leave dummy spans unused. A dummy span
does not have a logical 'next point', since it's a zero-length span.
Re-using the span span preserves its 'dummy-ness' for other checks
rustdoc: Note why `rustdoc::html::markdown` is public
Almost all of the modules are crate-private, except for
`rustdoc::json::types`, which I believe is intended to be for public
use; and `rustdoc::html::markdown`, which is used externally by the
error-index generator and so has to be public.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Add some tests for associated-type-bounds issues
Closes#38917Closes#40093Closes#43475Closes#63591#47897 is likely closable too, but it needs an MCVE
~~#38917, #40093, #43475, #47897 all are mislabeled and shouldn't have the `F-associated-type-bounds` label~~
~~#71685 is also mislabeled as commented on in that thread~~
Add lint for 2229 migrations
Implements the first for RFC 2229 where we make the decision to migrate a root variable based on if the type of the variable needs Drop and if the root variable would be moved into the closure when the feature isn't enabled.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
add `Vec::extend_from_within` method under `vec_extend_from_within` feature gate
Implement <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2714>
### tl;dr
This PR adds a `extend_from_within` method to `Vec` which allows copying elements from a range to the end:
```rust
#![feature(vec_extend_from_within)]
let mut vec = vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4];
vec.extend_from_within(2..);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4]);
vec.extend_from_within(..2);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1]);
vec.extend_from_within(4..8);
assert_eq!(vec, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 0, 1, 4, 2, 3, 4]);
```
### Implementation notes
Originally I've copied `@Shnatsel's` [implementation](690742a0de/src/lib.rs (L74)) with some minor changes to support other ranges:
```rust
pub fn append_from_within<R>(&mut self, src: R)
where
T: Copy,
R: RangeBounds<usize>,
{
let len = self.len();
let Range { start, end } = src.assert_len(len);;
let count = end - start;
self.reserve(count);
unsafe {
// This is safe because `reserve()` above succeeded,
// so `self.len() + count` did not overflow usize
ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(
self.get_unchecked(src.start),
self.as_mut_ptr().add(len),
count,
);
self.set_len(len + count);
}
}
```
But then I've realized that this duplicates most of the code from (private) `Vec::append_elements`, so I've used it instead.
Then I've applied `@KodrAus` suggestions from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79015#issuecomment-727200852.
Update armhf-gnu to Ubuntu 20.04
This requires updating the used Linux kernel to avoid an assembler
error, the used busybox version to avoid a linker error, the used
rootfs to match the host version and the qemu flags to work with
the newer version.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Update cargo
5 commits in c3abcfe8a75901c7c701557a728941e8fb19399e..e099df243bb2495b9b197f79c19f124032b1e778
2021-01-25 16:16:43 +0000 to 2021-02-01 16:24:34 +0000
- Impl warn for locked install without Cargo.lock (rust-lang/cargo#9108)
- Document -Z extra-link-arg. (rust-lang/cargo#9121)
- Flip 'foo' and 'bar' to be consistent (rust-lang/cargo#9120)
- Don't try to parse MSRV if feature is not enabled (rust-lang/cargo#9115)
- simplify char range check (rust-lang/cargo#9110)
Fix primitive search in parameters and returned values
Part of #60485.
Fixes#74780.
Replacing #74879.
cc `@camelid` `@jyn514` `@CraftSpider`
r? `@ollie27`
- This allows us add fake information after handling migrations if
needed.
- Capture analysis also priortizes what we see earlier, which means
fake information should go in last.
The different impls are all guarded by cfg-flags, and the revisions could be
used to cover the full power-set of combinations.
(I only included 20 of the possible 32 cases here; the null-set is not
interesting, and the remaining 11 all yielded ambiguous method resolution errors
which did not mix well with this testing strategy; I'm not trying to check UI
for the resolution diagnostics; I'm trying to create checkpoint of current
resolution semantics when compilation succeeds.)
Add visitors for checking #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with struct field
Fix test for #[inline]
Add visitors for checking #[inline] with #[macro_export] macro
Add visitors for checking #[inline] without #[macro_export] macro
Add use alias with Visitor
Fix lint error
Reduce unnecessary variable
Co-authored-by: LingMan <LingMan@users.noreply.github.com>
Change error to warning
Add warning for checking field, arm with #[allow_internal_unstable]
Add name resolver
Formatting
Formatting
Fix error fixture
Add checking field, arm, macro def
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
The highlight of this sync are abi compatibility with cg_llvm allowing mixing of cg_clif and cg_llvm compiled crates and switching to the x64 cranelift backend based on the new backend framework.
r? ``@ghost``
``@rustbot`` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
