Refactor AST trait bound modifiers
Instead of having two types to represent trait bound modifiers in the parser / the AST (`parser::ty::BoundModifiers` & `ast::TraitBoundModifier`), only to map one to the other later, just use `parser::ty::BoundModifiers` (moved & renamed to `ast::TraitBoundModifiers`).
The struct type is more extensible and easier to deal with (see [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119099/files#r1430749981) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119099/files#r1430752116) for context) since it more closely models what it represents: A compound of two kinds of modifiers, constness and polarity. Modeling this as an enum (the now removed `ast::TraitBoundModifier`) meant one had to add a new variant per *combination* of modifier kind, which simply isn't scalable and which lead to a lot of explicit non-DRY matches.
NB: `hir::TraitBoundModifier` being an enum is fine since HIR doesn't need to worry representing invalid modifier kind combinations as those get rejected during AST validation thereby immensely cutting down the number of possibilities.
On LLVM 18 we get slightly different arguments here, so it's easier to
just regex those away. The important details are all still asserted as I
understand things.
Fixes#119193.
@rustbot label: +llvm-main
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118729 (Add release notes for 1.75.0)
- #119124 (don't build `rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv` on def config )
- #119154 (Simple modification of `non_lifetime_binders`'s diagnostic information to adapt to type binders)
- #119176 (Fix name error in aarch64_apple_watchos tier 3 target)
- #119182 (Update sysinfo version to 0.30.0)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix name error in aarch64_apple_watchos tier 3 target
fix llvm_target wrong name `aarch-apple-watchos` to `aarch64-apple-watchos`, sorry for my mistake.
previous pr: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119074
r? compiler-team
Simple modification of `non_lifetime_binders`'s diagnostic information to adapt to type binders
fixes#119067
Replace diagnostic information "lifetime bounds cannot be used in this context" to "bounds cannot be used in this context".
```rust
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
#![feature(non_lifetime_binders)]
trait Trait {}
trait Trait2
where for <T: Trait> ():{}
//~^ ERROR bounds cannot be used in this context
```
- Make temporaries in if-let guards be the same variable in MIR when
the guard is duplicated due to or-patterns.
- Change the "destruction scope" for match arms to be the arm scope rather
than the arm body scope.
- Add tests.
Adds a pair of lints that check for cases of an iterator over `Result`
and `Option` followed by `filter` without being followed by `map` as
that is covered already by a different, specialized lint.
changelog: New Lint: [`iter_filter_is_some`]
changelog: New Lint: [`iter_filter_is_ok`]
Give `VariantData::Struct` named fields, to clairfy `recovered`.
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119121#discussion_r1431467066. Supersedes #119121
This way, it's clear what the bool fields means, instead of having to find where it's generated. Changes both ast and hir.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Add method to get instance instantiation arguments
Add a method to get the instance instantiation arguments, and include that information in the instance debug.
Fix crash due to `CrateItem::kind()` not handling constructors
Also add a method to get the instance instantiation arguments, and include that information in the instance debug.
do not allow ABI mismatches inside repr(C) types
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115476 we allowed ABI mismatches inside `repr(C)` types. This wasn't really discussed much; I added it because from how I understand calling conventions, this should actually be safe in practice. However I entirely forgot to actually allow this in Miri, and in the mean time I have learned that too much ABI compatibility can be a problem for CFI (it can reject fewer calls so that gives an attacker more room to play with).
So I propose we take back that part about ABI compatibility in `repr(C)`. It is anyway something that C and C++ do not allow, as far as I understand.
In the future we might want to introduce a class of ABI compatibilities where we say "this is a bug and it may lead to aborting the process, but it won't lead to arbitrary misbehavior -- worst case it'll just transmute the arguments from the caller type to the callee type". That would give CFI leeway to reject such calls without introducing the risk of arbitrary UB. (The UB can still happen if the transmute leads to bad results, of course, but it wouldn't be due to ABI weirdness.)
#115476 hasn't reached beta yet so if we land this before Dec 22nd we can just pretend this all never happened. ;) Otherwise we should do a beta backport (of the docs change at least).
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@rust-lang/types`
