Add Cargo-style project discovery for Buck and Bazel Users
This feature requires the user to add a command that generates a `rust-project.json` from a set of files. Project discovery can be invoked in two ways:
1. At extension activation time, which includes the generated `rust-project.json` as part of the linkedProjects argument in `InitializeParams`.
2. Through a new command titled "rust-analyzer: Add current file to workspace", which makes use of a new, rust-analyzer-specific LSP request that adds the workspace without erasing any existing workspaces. Note that there is no mechanism to _remove_ workspaces other than "quit the rust-analyzer server".
Few notes:
- I think that the command-running functionality _could_ merit being placed into its own extension (and expose it via extension contribution points) to provide build-system idiomatic progress reporting and status handling, but I haven't (yet) made an extension that does this nor does Buck expose this sort of functionality.
- This approach would _just work_ for Bazel. I'll try and get the tool that's responsible for Buck integration open-sourced soon.
- On the testing side of things, I've used this in around my employer's Buck-powered monorepo and it's a nice experience. That being said, I can't think of an open-source repository where this can be tested in public, so you might need to trust me on this one.
I'd love to get feedback on:
- Naming of LSP extensions/new commands. I'm not too pleased with how "rust-analyzer: Add current file to workspace" is named, in that it's creating a _new_ workspace. I think that this command being added should be gated on `rust-analyzer.discoverProjectCommand` on being set, so I can add this in sequent commits.
- My Typescript. It's not particularly good.
- Suggestions on handling folders with _both_ Cargo and non-Cargo build systems and if I make activation a bit better.
(I previously tried to add this functionality entirely within rust-analyzer-the-LSP server itself, but matklad was right—an extension side approach is much, much easier.)
internal: add `as_slice` to `hir::Type`
~`remove_slice`~ `as_slice` is same as `remove_ref` but for slices.
Though there is `as_array` which I believe was named such because it also gets the length of the array, maybe. I am still shaky on the names feel free to suggest corrections.
feat: add `is_float` & `is_char` to `hir::Type`
Some useful functions we didn't have on `Type` (were present on `BuiltinType`).
Also, I am considering exposing `TyKind` with `get_kind`, let me know if that's a better idea than implementing these API extensions incrementally.
Add path of workspace root folders to status output
Hi folks! Just a quick addition to the status output. There are some colleagues of mine who use a mix of Buck and Cargo. A person spent a bit of time this past week trying to figure out there the `rust-project.json` was coming from and pointed out that `rust-analyzer: Status` could be a good place to put this information. rust-analyzer doesn't seem to record the full path of the `Cargo.toml` or the `rust-project.json`, just the root directory. While not perfect, this should be enough for people to unblock themselves on. Here's an example of `rust-analyzer: Status` on the rust-analyzer repo:
```
Workspaces:
Loaded 192 packages across 1 workspace.
Workspace roots: [AbsPath("/Users/dbarsky/Developer/rust-analyzer")]
Analysis:
57mb of files
0b of index symbols (0)
2514 trees, 128 preserved
29535 trees, 128 preserved (Macros)
0b in total
File info:
Crate: rust_analyzer(CrateId(131))
Dependencies: proc_macro=CrateId(5), core=CrateId(2), alloc=CrateId(0), std=CrateId(7), test=CrateId(9), always_assert=CrateId(12), anyhow=CrateId(13), cfg=CrateId(25), crossbeam_channel=CrateId(35), dissimilar=CrateId(41), expect_test=CrateId(46), flycheck=CrateId(50), hir=CrateId(56), hir_def=CrateId(57), hir_ty=CrateId(59), ide=CrateId(63), ide_db=CrateId(66), ide_ssr=CrateId(68), itertools=CrateId(73), jod_thread=CrateId(75), lsp_server=CrateId(83), lsp_types=CrateId(85), mbe=CrateId(87), num_cpus=CrateId(96), oorandom=CrateId(99), parking_lot=CrateId(102), proc_macro_api=CrateId(110), proc_macro_srv=CrateId(111), profile=CrateId(118), project_model=CrateId(119), rayon=CrateId(125), rustc_hash=CrateId(136), scip=CrateId(141), serde=CrateId(145), serde_json=CrateId(147), sourcegen=CrateId(153), stdx=CrateId(155), syntax=CrateId(158), test_utils=CrateId(159), threadpool=CrateId(165), toolchain=CrateId(170), tracing=CrateId(171), tracing_log=CrateId(174), tracing_subscriber=CrateId(175), tracing_tree=CrateId(176), tt=CrateId(177), vfs=CrateId(188), vfs_notify=CrateId(189), xflags=CrateId(192), xshell=CrateId(194)
```
This feature requires the user to add a command that generates a
`rust-project.json` from a set of files. Project discovery can be invoked
in two ways:
1. At extension activation time, which includes the generated
`rust-project.json` as part of the linkedProjects argument in
InitializeParams
2. Through a new command titled "Add current file to workspace", which
makes use of a new, rust-analyzer specific LSP request that adds
the workspace without erasing any existing workspaces.
I think that the command-running functionality _could_ merit being
placed into its own extension (and expose it via extension contribution
points), if only provide build-system idiomatic progress reporting and
status handling, but I haven't (yet) made an extension that does this.
internal: Rename `hir::diagnostics::MissingMatchArms.match_expr` field
`hir::diagnostics::MissingMatchArms.match_expr` had confusing name: it is pointing to scrutinee expression. Renamed to `scrutinee_expr` and used better fitting type for it.
Also small refactorings/cleanup.
fix: Watch both stdout and stderr in flycheck
Fixes#14217
This isn't great because it un-mixes the messages from the two streams, but maybe it's not such a big problem?
