Implement checked Shl/Shr at MIR building.
This does not require any special handling by codegen backends,
as the overflow behaviour is entirely determined by the rhs (shift amount).
This allows MIR ConstProp to remove the overflow check for constant shifts.
~There is an existing different behaviour between cg_llvm and cg_clif (cc `@bjorn3).`
I took cg_llvm's one as reference: overflow if `rhs < 0 || rhs > number_of_bits_in_lhs_ty`.~
EDIT: `cg_llvm` and `cg_clif` implement the overflow check differently. This PR uses `cg_llvm`'s implementation based on a `BitAnd` instead of `cg_clif`'s one based on an unsigned comparison.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108991 (add `enable-warnings` flag for llvm, and disable it by default.)
- #109109 (Use `unused_generic_params` from crate metadata)
- #109111 (Create dirs for build_triple)
- #109136 (Simplify proc macro signature validity check)
- #109150 (Update cargo)
- #109154 (Fix MappingToUnit to support no span of arg_ty)
- #109157 (Remove mw from review rotation for a while)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Simplify proc macro signature validity check
Use an `ObligationCtxt` instead of `normalize_erasing_regions` + `DeepRejectCtxt`. This should both give us a more accurate error message, and also avoid issues like not-well-formed proc macro signatures. Also, let's fall back on the regular type mismatch error reporting for making these diagnostic notes, instead of hard-coding a bunch of specific diagnostics.
Fixes#109129
Ensure `ptr::read` gets all the same LLVM `load` metadata that dereferencing does
I was looking into `array::IntoIter` optimization, and noticed that it wasn't annotating the loads with `noundef` for simple things like `array::IntoIter<i32, N>`. Trying to narrow it down, it seems that was because `MaybeUninit::assume_init_read` isn't marking the load as initialized (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Mxd8TPTnv>), which is unfortunate since that's basically its reason to exist.
The root cause is that `ptr::read` is currently implemented via the *untyped* `copy_nonoverlapping`, and thus the `load` doesn't get any type-aware metadata: no `noundef`, no `!range`. This PR solves that by lowering `ptr::read(p)` to `copy *p` in MIR, for which the backends already do the right thing.
Fortuitiously, this also improves the IR we give to LLVM for things like `mem::replace`, and fixes a couple of long-standing bugs where `ptr::read` on `Copy` types was worse than `*`ing them.
Zulip conversation: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Move.20array.3A.3AIntoIter.20to.20ManuallyDrop/near/341189936>
cc `@erikdesjardins` `@JakobDegen` `@workingjubilee` `@the8472`
Fixes#106369Fixes#73258
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108722 (Support for Fuchsia RISC-V target)
- #108880 (Remove tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/new-lowering-strategy in favor of using revisions on existing tests)
- #108909 (Fix object safety checks for new RPITITs)
- #108915 (Remove some direct calls to local_def_id_to_hir_id on diagnostics)
- #108923 (Make fns from other crates with RPITIT work for -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty)
- #109101 (Fall back to old metadata computation when type references errors)
- #109105 (Don't ICE for late-bound consts across `AnonConstBoundary`)
- #109110 (Don't codegen impossible to satisfy impls)
- #109116 (Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Emit diagnostic when calling methods on the unit type in method chains
Fixes#104204.
What this PR does: If a method is not found somewhere in a call chain, we check if we called earlier a method with signature `(&mut T, ...) -> ()`. If this is the case then we emit a diagnostic message.
For example given input:
```
vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
```
the current output is:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
```
after this PR it will be:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `sort` found for unit type `()` in the current scope
--> ./hello.rs:3:72
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^ method not found in `()`
|
note: method `sort_by_key` modifies its receiver in-place, it is not meant to be used in method chains.
--> ./hello.rs:3:53
|
3 | vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter().collect::<Vec<i32>>().sort_by_key(|i| i).sort();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ this call modifies its receiver in-place
```
Fall back to old metadata computation when type references errors
Projection is a bit too aggressive normalizing `<dyn Trait<[type error]> as Pointee>::Metadata` to `[type error]`, rather than to `DynMetadata<..>`. Side-step that by just falling back to the old structural metadata computation.
Fixes#109078
Make fns from other crates with RPITIT work for -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty
Only the last two commits are meaningful.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Remove tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/new-lowering-strategy in favor of using revisions on existing tests
r? `@compiler-errors`
This one again sits on top of existing approved PRs and it still needs to add revisions to tests in `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait` as it only does so for async in traits.
If no method is found when checking method call, we check if we called a method with signature (&mut T, ...) -> (). If this is the case then we emit a diagnostic message
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures
Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly.
This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me).
Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string.
The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see #106191). So I tightened it up in #106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal.
This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`).
This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again.
Fixes#106191
[RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive
checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was
likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the
spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is
indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly.
This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a
"direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was
imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was
only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not
whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a
source literal, this is not clear to me).
Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which
is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros
expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit
captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source
string.
The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in
certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy
backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work
if it's a direct source literal.
This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source
literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal"
anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned
the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal,
it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the
users of `indoc`).
This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of
"source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc`
invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit
captures again.
[RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
Remove `identity_future` indirection
This was previously needed because the indirection used to hide some unexplained lifetime errors, which it turned out were related to the `min_choice` algorithm.
Removing the indirection also solves a couple of cycle errors, large moves and makes async blocks support the `#[track_caller]`annotation.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104826.
Gracefully handle `#[target_feature]` on statics
The was careful around not calling `fn_sig` on not-functions but well, it wasn't careful enough. This commit makes it a little more careful and also adds tests for a bunch more item kinds.
I was sadly not able to fully bless the test locally because I'm on an aarch64 machine but I hope some manual editing made it work 😅Fix#109079
The was careful around not calling `fn_sig` on not-functions but well,
it wasn't careful enough. This commit makes it a little more careful and
also adds tests for a bunch more item kinds.
Remove `box_syntax`
r? `@Nilstrieb`
This removes the feature `box_syntax`, which allows the use of `box <expr>` to create a Box, and finalises removing use of the feature from the compiler. `box_patterns` (allowing the use of `box <pat>` in a pattern) is unaffected.
It also removes `ast::ExprKind::Box` - the only way to create a 'box' expression now is with the rustc-internal `#[rustc_box]` attribute.
As a temporary measure to help users move away, `box <expr>` now parses the inner expression, and emits a `MachineApplicable` lint to replace it with `Box::new`
Closes#49733
Strengthen state tracking in const-prop
Some/many of the changes are replicated between both the const-prop lint and the const-prop optimization.
Behaviour changes:
- const-prop opt does not give a span to propagated values. This was useless as that span's primary purpose is to diagnose evaluation failure in codegen.
- we remove the `OnlyPropagateInto` mode. It was only used for function arguments, which are better modeled by a write before entry.
- the tracking of assignments and discriminants make clearer that we do nothing in `NoPropagation` mode or on indirect places.
Gate usages of `dyn*` and const closures in macros
We silently accepted `dyn*` and const closures in macros as long as they didn't expand to anything containing these experimental features, unlike other gated features such as `for<'a>` binders on closures, etc. Let's not do that, to make sure nobody begins relying on this.
Commit some tests for the new solver + lazy norm
Also consolidate `typeck/lazy-norm` into `traits/new-solver`, since it's not really useful to maintain a distinction, like when a test really is due to "lazy norm" or "the new solver" (usually both!)
Add suggestion to diagnostic when user has array but trait wants slice. (rebased)
Rebase of #91314, except for change to multipart suggestion
Resolves#90528
r? ``@compiler-errors`` since you requested the multipart suggestion
I was looking into `array::IntoIter` optimization, and noticed that it wasn't annotating the loads with `noundef` for simple things like `array::IntoIter<i32, N>`.
Turned out to be a more general problem as `MaybeUninit::assume_init_read` isn't marking the load as initialized (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/Mxd8TPTnv>), which is unfortunate since that's basically its reason to exist.
This PR lowers `ptr::read(p)` to `copy *p` in MIR, which fortuitiously also improves the IR we give to LLVM for things like `mem::replace`.
