Use the monorepo's lockfile when building cargo for PGO profiling
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81378. The description of the problem and the reasoning for the fix is in the source code comments.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Add expected error
Add comment
Tweak comment wording
Fix after rebase to updated master
Fix after rebase to updated master
Distinguish mutation in normal and move closures
Tweak error message
Fix error message for nested closures
Refactor code showing mutated upvar in closure
Remove debug assert
B
Use elapsed wall time spent on codegen_to_LLVM_IR for all CGUs as a
whole, rather than the sum for each CGU (the distinction matters for
parallel builds, where some CGUs are processed in parallel).
Otherwise we can miss bugs where a test reports that it succeeded but
then panics within a TLS destructor.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #75180 (Implement Error for &(impl Error))
- #78578 (Permit mutable references in all const contexts)
- #79174 (Make std::future a re-export of core::future)
- #79884 (Replace magic numbers with existing constants)
- #80855 (Expand assert!(expr, args..) to include $crate for hygiene on 2021.)
- #80933 (Fix sysroot option not being honored across rustc)
- #81259 (Replace version_check dependency with own version parsing code)
- #81264 (Add unstable option to control doctest run directory)
- #81279 (Small refactor in typeck)
- #81297 (Don't provide backend_optimization_level query for extern crates)
- #81302 (Fix rendering of stabilization version for trait implementors)
- #81310 (Do not mark unit variants as used when in path pattern)
- #81320 (Make bad shlex parsing a pretty error)
- #81338 (Clean up `dominators_given_rpo`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not mark unit variants as used when in path pattern
Record that we are processing a pattern so that code responsible for
handling path resolution can correctly decide whether to mark it as
used or not.
Closes#76788.
Fix rendering of stabilization version for trait implementors
Rustdoc compares an item's stabilization version with its parent's to not render it if they are the same. Here, the implementor was compared with itself, resulting in the stabilization version never getting shown.
This probably needs a test.
Fixes#80777.
r? `@jyn514`
Small refactor in typeck
- `check_impl_items_against_trait` only queries and walks through associated items once
- extracted function that reports errors
- don't check specialization validity when trait item does not match
- small additional cleanups
Replace version_check dependency with own version parsing code
This gives compiler maintainers a better degree of control
over how the version gets parsed and is a good way to ensure
that there are no changes of behaviour in the future.
Also, issue a warning if the version is invalid instead of erroring
so that we stay forwards compatible with possible future changes
of the versioning scheme.
Last, this improves the present test a little.
Fixes#79436
r? `@petrochenkov`
Fix sysroot option not being honored across rustc
Change link_sanitizer_runtime() to check if the sanitizer library exists in the specified/session sysroot, and if it doesn't exist, use the default sysroot. (See #79253.)
Expand assert!(expr, args..) to include $crate for hygiene on 2021.
This makes `assert!(expr, args..)` properly hygienic in Rust 2021.
This is part of rust-lang/rfcs#3007, see #80162.
Before edition 2021, this was a breaking change, as `std::panic` and `core::panic` are different. In edition 2021 they will be identical, making it possible to apply proper hygiene here.
Make std::future a re-export of core::future
After 1a764a7ef5, there are no `std::future`-specific items (except for `cfg(bootstrap)` items removed in 93eed402ad). So, instead of defining `std` own module, we can re-export the `core::future` directly.
Implement Error for &(impl Error)
Opening this up just to see what it breaks. It's unfortunate that `&(impl Error)` doesn't actually implement `Error`. If this direct approach doesn't work out then I'll try something different, like an `Error::by_ref` method.
**EDIT:** This is a super low-priority experiment so feel free to cancel it for more important crater runs! 🙂
-----
# Stabilization Report
## Why?
We've been working for the last few years to try "fix" the `Error` trait, which is probably one of the most fundamental in the whole standard library. One of its issues is that we commonly expect you to work with abstract errors through `dyn Trait`, but references and smart pointers over `dyn Trait` don't actually implement the `Error` trait. If you have a `&dyn Error` or a `Box<dyn Error>` you simply can't pass it to a method that wants a `impl Error`.
## What does this do?
This stabilizes the following trait impl:
```rust
impl<'a, T: Error + ?Sized + 'static> Error for &'a T;
```
This means that `&dyn Error` will now satisfy a `impl Error` bound.
It doesn't do anything with `Box<dyn Error>` directly. We discussed how we could do `Box<dyn Error>` in the thread here (and elsewhere in the past), but it seems like we need something like lattice-based specialization or a sprinkling of snowflake compiler magic to make that work. Having said that, with this new impl you _can_ now get a `impl Error` from a `Box<dyn Error>` by dereferencing it.
## What breaks?
A crater run revealed a few crates broke with something like the following:
```rust
// where e: &'short &'long dyn Error
err.source()
```
previously we'd auto-deref that `&'short &'long dyn Error` to return a `Option<&'long dyn Error>` from `source`, but now will call directly on `&'short impl Error`, so will return a `Option<&'short dyn Error>`. The fix is to manually deref:
```rust
// where e: &'short &'long dyn Error
(*err).source()
```
In the recent Libs meeting we considered this acceptable breakage.
parser: Collect tokens for values in key-value attributes
Fixes#81208 which happens when we parse the attribute value for the second time with an overridden span to synthesize tokens.
It also may be faster to collect tokens instead of re-synthesizing them.
Remove delay-binding for Win XP and Vista
The minimum supported Windows version is now Windows 7. Windows XP
and Windows Vista are no longer supported; both are already broken, and
require extra steps to use.
This commit removes the delayed-binding support for Windows API
functions that are present on all supported Windows targets. This has
several benefits: Removes needless complexity. Removes a load and
dynamic call on hot paths in mutex acquire / release. This may have
performance benefits.
* "Drop official support for Windows XP"
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/378
* "Firefox has ended support for Windows XP and Vista"
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/end-support-windows-xp-and-vista
Target stack-probe support configurable finely
This adds capability to configure the target's stack probe support in a
more precise manner than just on/off. In particular now we allow
choosing between always inline-asm, always call or either one of those
depending on the LLVM version.
Note that this removes the ability to turn off the generation of the
stack-probe attribute. This is valid to replace it with inline-asm for all targets because
`probe-stack="inline-asm"` will not generate any machine code on targets
that do not currently support stack probes. This makes support for stack
probes on targets that don't have any right now automatic with LLVM
upgrades in the future.
(This is valid to do based on the fact that clang unconditionally sets
this attribute when `-fstack-clash-protection` is used, AFAICT)
cc #77885
r? `@cuviper`
Various ABI refactorings
This includes changes to the rust abi and various refactorings that will hopefully make it easier to use the abi handling infrastructure of rustc in cg_clif. There are several refactorings that I haven't done. I am opening this draft PR to check that I haven't broken any non x86_64 architectures.
r? `@ghost`
This gives compiler maintainers a better degree of control
over how the version gets parsed and is a good way to ensure
that there are no changes of behaviour in the future.
Also, issue a warning if the version is invalid instead of erroring
so that we stay forwards compatible with possible future changes
of the versioning scheme.
Last, this improves the present test a little.
