10105: RfC: Use `todo!()` instead of `()` for missing fields r=jonas-schievink a=jo-so
Most commonly a field of a struct can be initialized with its default value than an empty tuple.
Co-authored-by: Jörg Sommer <joerg@jo-so.de>
The generated code with `()` doesn't compile in most of the cases. To signal
the developer there's something to do, fill in `todo!()`.
Because the file *missing_fields.rs* contains the string `todo!()` it needs
an exception for the test *check_todo*.
Moving tests to `rust-analyzer` crate allows removing walkdir dependency
from `xtask`. It does seem more reasonable to keep tidy tests outside of
the "build system" and closer to other integration tests.
* Keep codegen adjacent to the relevant crates.
* Remove codgen deps from xtask, speeding-up from-source installation.
This regresses the release process a bit, as it now needs to run the
tests (and, by extension, compile the code).
7220: same level folder rename for will_rename_files r=kjeremy a=ShuiRuTian
use tricky way to support folder rename.
Another step after #7009 and for #4471
Co-authored-by: ShuiRuTian <158983297@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Song Gao <158983297@qq.com>
Rather than eagerly converting JSON, we losslessly keep it as is, and
change the shape of user-submitted data at the last moment.
This also allows us to remove a bunch of wrong Defaults
I found that `textDocument/formatting` was always returning a full
`TextEdit` replacement, even when there are no changes, which caused Vim
(w/ vim-lsp) to always indicate a modified buffer after formatting. We
can easily compare whether there were changes and return `null` if not,
so the client knows there's nothing to do.
