This necessitated some cleanup to how we parse library filenames
when searching for libraries, since rustpkg may now create filenames
that contain '-' characters. Also cleaned up how rustpkg passes the
sysroot to a custom build script.
Get rid of special cases for names beginning with "rust-" or
containing hyphens, and just store a Path in a package ID. The Rust-identifier
for the crate is none of rustpkg's business.
This commit allows you to write:
extern mod x = "a/b/c";
which means rustc will search in the RUST_PATH for a package with
ID a/b/c, and bind it to the name `x` if it's found.
Incidentally, move get_relative_to from back::rpath into std::path
r? @graydon Package IDs can now be of the form a/b/c#FOO, where (if a/b/c is
a git repository) FOO is any tag in the repository. Non-numeric
tags only match against package IDs with the same tag, and aren't
compared linearly like numeric versions.
While I was at it, refactored the code that calls `git clone`, and segregated build output properly for different packages.
Package IDs can now be of the form a/b/c#FOO, where (if a/b/c is
a git repository) FOO is any tag in the repository. Non-numeric
tags only match against package IDs with the same tag, and aren't
compared linearly like numeric versions.
While I was at it, refactored the code that calls `git clone`,
and segregated build output properly for different packages.
`rustpkg build`, if executed in a package source directory inside
a workspace, will now build that package. By "inside a workspace"
I mean that the parent directory has to be called `src`, and rustpkg
will create a `build` directory in .. if there isn't already one.
Same goes for `rustpkg install` and `rustpkg clean`.
For the time being, `rustpkg build` (etc.) will still error out if
you run it inside a directory whose parent isn't called `src`.
I'm not sure whether or not it's desirable to have it do something
in a non-workspace directory.
rustpkg can now build code from a local git repository. In the
case where the local repo is in a directory not in the RUST_PATH,
it checks out the repository into a directory in the first workspace
in the RUST_PATH.
The tests no longer try to connect to github.com, which should
solve some of the sporadic failures we've been seeing.
Adds a lint for `static some_lowercase_name: uint = 1;`. Warning by default since it causes confusion, e.g. `static a: uint = 1; ... let a = 2;` => `error: only refutable patterns allowed here`.
@catamorphism, this re-enables threadsafe rustpkg tests, @brson this will fail unless the bots have LLVM rebuilt, so this is a good indicator of whether that happened or not.
Continuation of #7430.
I haven't removed the `map` method, since the replacement `v.iter().transform(f).collect::<~[SomeType]>()` is a little ridiculous at the moment.
r? @brson (or @graydon if available) rustpkg/api.rs provides functions intended for package scripts to call.
It will probably need more functionality added to it later, but this is
a start.
Added a test case checking that a package script can use the API.
Closes#6401
rustpkg/api.rs provides functions intended for package scripts to call.
It will probably need more functionality added to it later, but this is
a start.
Added a test case checking that a package script can use the API.
Closes#6401
I removed the `static-method-test.rs` test because it was heavily based
on `BaseIter` and there are plenty of other more complex uses of static
methods anyway.
The removed test for issue #2611 is well covered by the `std::iterator`
module itself.
This adds the `count` method to `IteratorUtil` to replace `EqIter`.
r? @graydon Automate more tests described in the commands.txt file,
and add infrastructure for running them. Right now, tests shell
out to call rustpkg. This is not ideal.
Goes part of the way towards addressing #5683
Automate more tests described in the commands.txt file,
and add infrastructure for running them. Right now, tests shell
out to call rustpkg. This is not ideal.
