Validate built-in attribute placement
Closes#54584, closes#47725, closes#54044.
I've changed silently ignoring some incorrectly placed attributes to errors. I'm not sure what the policy is since this can theoretically break code (should they be warnings instead? does it warrant a crater run?).
Give better suggestion when const Range*'s are used as patterns
Fixes#76191
let me know if there is more/different information you want to show in this case
Give better diagnostic when using a private tuple struct constructor
Fixes#75907
Some notes:
1. This required some deep changes, including removing a Copy impl for PatKind. If some tests fail, I would still appreciate review on the overall approach
2. this only works with basic patterns (no wildcards for example), and fails if there is any problems getting the visibility of the fields (i am not sure what the failure that can happen in resolve_visibility_speculative, but we check the length of our fields in both cases against each other, so if anything goes wrong, we fall back to the worse error. This could be extended to more patterns
3. this does not yet deal with #75906, but I believe it will be similar
4. let me know if you want more tests
5. doesn't yet at the suggestion that `@yoshuawuyts` suggested at the end of their issue, but that could be added relatively easily (i believe)
This commit adjusts the missing field diagnostic logic for struct
patterns in typeck to improve the diagnostic when the missing fields are
inaccessible.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit adjusts the missing field diagnostic logic for struct
expressions in typeck to improve the diagnostic when the missing
fields are inaccessible.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Improve unresolved use error message
"use of undeclared type or module `foo`" doesn't mention that it could be a crate.
This error can happen when users forget to add a dependency to `Cargo.toml`, so I think it's important to mention that it could be a missing crate.
I've used a heuristic based on Rust's naming conventions. It complains about an unknown type if the ident starts with an upper-case letter, and crate or module otherwise. It seems to work very well. The expanded error help covers both an unknown type and a missing crate case.
If a symbol name can only be imported from one place for a type, and
as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we
can trim its printed path and print only the name.
This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example,
shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other
`Vec` importable anywhere.
This adds a new '-Z trim-diagnostic-paths=false' option to control this
feature.
On the good path, with no diagnosis printed, we should try to avoid
issuing this query, so we need to prevent trimmed_def_paths query on
several cases.
This change also relies on a previous commit that differentiates
between `Debug` and `Display` on various rustc types, where the latter
is trimmed and presented to the user and the former is not.
Currently, the def span of a funtion encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.
This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function
```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```
now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).
Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}```
the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`
This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.
We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:
* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
* The 'unconditional recursion' lint uses the full span to show
additional context for the recursive call.
All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
Don't emit "is not a logical operator" error outside of associative expressions
Avoid showing this error where it doesn't make sense by not assuming
"and" and "or" were intended to mean "&&" and "||" until after we decide
to continue parsing input as an associative expression.
Note that the decision of whether or not to continue parsing input as an
associative expression doesn't actually depend on this assumption.
Fixes#75599
---
First time contributor! Let me know if there are any conventions or policies I should be following that I missed here. Thanks :)
Avoid showing this error where it doesn't make sense by not assuming
"and" and "or" were intended to mean "&&" and "||" until after we decide
to continue parsing input as an associative expression.
Note that the decision of whether or not to continue parsing input as an
associative expression doesn't actually depend on this assumption.
Fixes#75599
Tweak conditions for E0026 and E0769
When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to suggest the expected syntax.
Given
```rust
fn main() {
match MyOption::MySome(42) {
MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),
_ => (),
}
}
```
We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant" instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`".
Clean up errors in typeck and resolve
* Tweak ordering of suggestions
* Do not suggest similarly named enclosing item
* Point at item definition in foreign crates
* Add missing primary label
CC #34255.
Remove restriction on type parameters preceding consts w/ feature const-generics
Removed the restriction on type parameters preceding const parameters when the feature const-generics is enabled.
Builds on #74676, which deals with unsorted generic parameters. This just lifts the check in lowering the AST to HIR that permits consts and types to be reordered with respect to each other. Lifetimes still must precede both
This change is not intended for min-const-generics, and is gated behind the `#![feature(const_generics)]`.
One thing is that it also permits type parameters without a default to come after consts, which I expected to not work, and was hoping to get more guidance on whether that should be permitted or how to prevent it otherwise.
I did not go through the RFC process for this pull request because there was prior work to get this feature added. In the previous PR that was cited, work was done to enable this change.
r? @lcnr
When we have a tuple struct used with struct we don't want to suggest using
the (valid) struct syntax with numeric field names. Instead we want to
suggest the expected syntax.
Given
```rust
fn main() {
match MyOption::MySome(42) {
MyOption::MySome { x: 42 } => (),
_ => (),
}
}
```
We now emit E0769 "tuple variant `MyOption::MySome` written as struct variant"
instead of E0026 "variant `MyOption::MySome` does not have a field named `x`".
Fix change detection in CfgSimplifier::collapse_goto_chain
Check that the old target is different from the new collapsed one, before concluding that anything changed.
Fixes#75074Fixes#75051
Stabilize `Result::as_deref` and `as_deref_mut`
FCP completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50264#issuecomment-645681400.
This PR stabilizes two new APIs for `std::result::Result`:
```rust
fn as_deref(&self) -> Result<&T::Target, &E> where T: Deref;
fn as_deref_mut(&mut self) -> Result<&mut T::Target, &mut E> where T: DerefMut;
```
This PR also removes two rarely used unstable APIs from `Result`:
```rust
fn as_deref_err(&self) -> Result<&T, &E::Target> where E: Deref;
fn as_deref_mut_err(&mut self) -> Result<&mut T, &mut E::Target> where E: DerefMut;
```
Closes#50264
compiletest: Support ignoring tests requiring missing LLVM components
This PR implements a more principled solution to the problem described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66084.
Builds of LLVM backends take a lot of time and disk space.
So it usually makes sense to build rustc with
```toml
[llvm]
targets = "X86"
experimental-targets = ""
```
unless you are working on some target-specific tasks.
A few tests, however, require non-x86 backends to be built.
A new test directive `// needs-llvm-components: component1 component2 component3` makes such tests to be automatically ignored if one of the listed components is missing in the provided LLVM (this is determined through `llvm-config --components`).
As a result, the test suite now fully passes with LLVM built only with the x86 backend. The component list in this case is
```
aggressiveinstcombine all all-targets analysis asmparser asmprinter binaryformat bitreader bitstreamreader bitwriter cfguard codegen core coroutines coverage debuginfocodeview debuginfodwarf debuginfogsym debuginfomsf debuginfopdb demangle dlltooldriver dwarflinker engine executionengine frontendopenmp fuzzmutate globalisel instcombine instrumentation interpreter ipo irreader jitlink libdriver lineeditor linker lto mc mca mcdisassembler mcjit mcparser mirparser native nativecodegen objcarcopts object objectyaml option orcerror orcjit passes profiledata remarks runtimedyld scalaropts selectiondag support symbolize tablegen target textapi transformutils vectorize windowsmanifest x86 x86asmparser x86codegen x86desc x86disassembler x86info x86utils xray
```
(With the default target list it's much larger.)
```
aarch64 aarch64asmparser aarch64codegen aarch64desc aarch64disassembler aarch64info aarch64utils aggressiveinstcombine all all-targets analysis arm armasmparser armcodegen armdesc armdisassembler arminfo armutils asmparser asmprinter avr avrasmparser avrcodegen avrdesc avrdisassembler avrinfo binaryformat bitreader bitstreamreader bitwriter cfguard codegen core coroutines coverage debuginfocodeview debuginfodwarf debuginfogsym debuginfomsf debuginfopdb demangle dlltooldriver dwarflinker engine executionengine frontendopenmp fuzzmutate globalisel hexagon hexagonasmparser hexagoncodegen hexagondesc hexagondisassembler hexagoninfo instcombine instrumentation interpreter ipo irreader jitlink libdriver lineeditor linker lto mc mca mcdisassembler mcjit mcparser mips mipsasmparser mipscodegen mipsdesc mipsdisassembler mipsinfo mirparser msp430 msp430asmparser msp430codegen msp430desc msp430disassembler msp430info native nativecodegen nvptx nvptxcodegen nvptxdesc nvptxinfo objcarcopts object objectyaml option orcerror orcjit passes powerpc powerpcasmparser powerpccodegen powerpcdesc powerpcdisassembler powerpcinfo profiledata remarks riscv riscvasmparser riscvcodegen riscvdesc riscvdisassembler riscvinfo riscvutils runtimedyld scalaropts selectiondag sparc sparcasmparser sparccodegen sparcdesc sparcdisassembler sparcinfo support symbolize systemz systemzasmparser systemzcodegen systemzdesc systemzdisassembler systemzinfo tablegen target textapi transformutils vectorize webassembly webassemblyasmparser webassemblycodegen webassemblydesc webassemblydisassembler webassemblyinfo windowsmanifest x86 x86asmparser x86codegen x86desc x86disassembler x86info x86utils xray
```
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66084 is also reverted now.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Fix ICEs with `@ ..` binding
This reverts #74557 and introduces an alternative fix while ensuring that #74954 is not broken.
The diagnostics are verbose though, it fixes three related issues.
cc #74954, #74539, and #74702
