forbid manually impl'ing one of an object type's marker traits
This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use
`feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is
only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the
marker trait is defined in, which must define
`feature(optin_builtin_traits)`.
Fixes#56934.
r? @nikomatsakis
Modify some parser diagnostics to continue evaluating beyond the parser
Continue evaluating further errors after parser errors on:
- trailing type argument attribute
- lifetime in incorrect location
- incorrect binary literal
- missing `for` in `impl Trait for Foo`
- type argument in `where` clause
- incorrect float literal
- incorrect `..` in pattern
- associated types
- incorrect discriminator value variant error
and others. All of these were found by making `continue-parse-after-error` `true` by default to identify errors that would need few changes. There are now only a handful of errors that have any change with `continue-parse-after-error` enabled.
These changes make it so `rust` _won't_ stop evaluation after finishing parsing, enabling type checking errors to be displayed on the existing code without having to fix the parse errors.
Each commit has an individual diagnostic change with their corresponding tests.
CC #48724.
This was originally attempted in #57048 but it was realized that we
could fully remove the crate via the `"unadjusted"` ABI on intrinsics.
This means that all intrinsics in stdsimd are implemented directly
against LLVM rather than using the abstraction layer provided here. That
ends up meaning that this crate is no longer used at all.
This crate developed long ago to implement the SIMD intrinsics, but we
didn't end up using it in the long run. In that case let's remove it!
Stabilize cfg_target_vendor
This stabilizes the use of `cfg(target_vendor = "...")` and removes the corresponding `cfg_target_vendor` feature. Other unstable cfgs remain behind their existing feature gates.
This functionality was added back in 2015 in #28612 to complete the coverage of target tuples (`<arch><sub>-<vendor>-<os>-<env>`). [RFC 131](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0131-target-specification.md) governs the target specification, not including `target_vendor` seems to have just been an oversight. `target_os`, `target_family`, and `target_arch` are stable as of 1.0.0. `target_env` was also not mentioned in RFC 131, was added in #24777, never behind a feature_gate, and insta-stable at 1.1.0.
The functionality is tested in [test/run-pass/cfg/cfg-target-vendor.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/run-pass/cfg/cfg-target-vendor.rs).
Closes#29718
Stabilize core::convert::identity
r? @SimonSapin
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53500
This is waiting for FCP to complete but in the interim it would be good to review.
Use structured suggestions for nonstandard style lints
This PR modifies the lints in the nonstandard_style group to use structured suggestions. Note that there's a bit of tricky span calculation going on for the `crate_name` attribute. It also simplifies the code a bit: I don't think the "fallback" suggestions for these lints can actually be triggered.
Fixes#48103.
Fixes#52414.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #56874 (Simplify foreign type rendering.)
- #57113 (Move diagnostics out from QueryJob and optimize for the case with no diagnostics)
- #57366 (Point at match discriminant on type error in match arm pattern)
- #57538 (librustc_mir: Fix ICE with slice patterns)
Failed merges:
- #57381 (Tweak output of type mismatch between "then" and `else` `if` arms)
r? @ghost
librustc_mir: Fix ICE with slice patterns
If a match arm does not include all fields in a structure and a later
pattern includes a field that is an array, we will attempt to use the
array type from the prior arm. When calculating the field type, treat
a array of an unknown size as a `TyErr`.
Fixes: #57472
Point at match discriminant on type error in match arm pattern
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:5:9
|
4 | let temp: usize = match a + b {
| ----- this expression has type `usize`
5 | Ok(num) => num,
| ^^^^^^^ expected usize, found enum `std::result::Result`
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found type `std::result::Result<_, _>`
```
Fix#57279.
This shouldn't break compatibility for crates that do not use
`feature(optin_builtin_traits)`, because as the test shows, it is
only possible to impl a marker trait for a trait object in the crate the
marker trait is defined in, which must define
`feature(optin_builtin_traits)`.
Fixes#56934
NLL: Add union justifications to conflicting borrows.
Fixes#57100.
This PR adds justifications to error messages for conflicting borrows of union fields.
Where previously an error message would say ``cannot borrow `u.b` as mutable..``, it now says ``cannot borrow `u` (via `u.b`) as mutable..``.
r? @pnkfelix
If a match arm does not include all fields in a structure and a later
pattern includes a field that is an array, we will attempt to use the
array type from the prior arm. When calculating the field type, treat
a array of an unknown size as a TyErr.
Update the const fn tracking issue to the new metabug
The new `const fn` tracking issue is #57563. We don't want to point to a closed issue in the diagnostics (or FIXMEs), so these have been updated (from the old issue, #24111).
r? @Centril
...while still keeping ambiguity errors future-proofing for uniform paths.
This corner case is not going to be stabilized for 1.32 and needs some more general experiments about retrofitting 2018 import rules to 2015 edition
Rollup of 26 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #56425 (Redo the docs for Vec::set_len)
- #56906 (Issue #56905)
- #57042 (Don't call `FieldPlacement::count` when count is too large)
- #57175 (Stabilize `let` bindings and destructuring in constants and const fn)
- #57192 (Change std::error::Error trait documentation to talk about `source` instead of `cause`)
- #57296 (Fixed the link to the ? operator)
- #57368 (Use CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_LAUNCHER for ccache)
- #57400 (Rustdoc: update Source Serif Pro and replace Heuristica italic)
- #57417 (rustdoc: use text-based doctest parsing if a macro is wrapping main)
- #57433 (Add link destination for `read-ownership`)
- #57434 (Remove `CrateNum::Invalid`.)
- #57441 (Supporting backtrace for x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx.)
- #57450 (actually take a slice in this example)
- #57459 (Reference tracking issue for inherent associated types in diagnostic)
- #57463 (docs: Fix some 'second-edition' links)
- #57466 (Remove outdated comment)
- #57493 (use structured suggestion when casting a reference)
- #57498 (make note of one more normalization that Paths do)
- #57499 (note that FromStr does not work for borrowed types)
- #57505 (Remove submodule step from README)
- #57510 (Add a profiles section to the manifest)
- #57511 (Fix undefined behavior)
- #57519 (Correct RELEASES.md for 1.32.0)
- #57522 (don't unwrap unexpected tokens in `format!`)
- #57530 (Fixing a typographical error.)
- #57535 (Stabilise irrefutable if-let and while-let patterns)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Reference tracking issue for inherent associated types in diagnostic
This makes it clearer that associated types in inherent impls are an intended feature, like the diagnostic for equality constraints in where clauses. (This is more helpful, because the lack of associated types is a confusing omission and it lets users more easily track the state of the feature.)
Stabilize `let` bindings and destructuring in constants and const fn
r? @Centril
This PR stabilizes the following features in constants and `const` functions:
* irrefutable destructuring patterns (e.g. `const fn foo((x, y): (u8, u8)) { ... }`)
* `let` bindings (e.g. `let x = 1;`)
* mutable `let` bindings (e.g. `let mut x = 1;`)
* assignment (e.g. `x = y`) and assignment operator (e.g. `x += y`) expressions, even where the assignment target is a projection (e.g. a struct field or index operation like `x[3] = 42`)
* expression statements (e.g. `3;`)
This PR does explicitly *not* stabilize:
* mutable references (i.e. `&mut T`)
* dereferencing mutable references
* refutable patterns (e.g. `Some(x)`)
* operations on `UnsafeCell` types (as that would need raw pointers and mutable references and such, not because it is explicitly forbidden. We can't explicitly forbid it as such values are OK as long as they aren't mutated.)
* We are not stabilizing `let` bindings in constants that use `&&` and `||` short circuiting operations. These are treated as `&` and `|` inside `const` and `static` items right now. If we stopped treating them as `&` and `|` after stabilizing `let` bindings, we'd break code like `let mut x = false; false && { x = true; false };`. So to use `let` bindings in constants you need to change `&&` and `||` to `&` and `|` respectively.
NLL: Fix bug in associated constant type annotations.
Fixes#57280.
This PR reverses the variance used when relating types from the type
annotation of an associated constant - this matches the behaviour of the
lexical borrow checker and fixes a bug whereby matching a `&'a str`
against a `&'static str` would produce an error.
r? @nikomatsakis
tests: Do not use `-Z parse-only`, continue compilation to test recovery
Make tests closer to reality!
The next step will be enabling `-Z continue-parse-after-error` by default and looking at the regressions.
A few instances of `-Z parse-only` are kept when it's appropriate, see e.g `ui/impl-trait/impl-trait-plus-priority.rs`, which tests mostly semantically wrong code and would generate too much useless noise if allowed to continue.
Make sure feature gate errors are recoverable (take 2)
Continuation of 15cefe4b2a.
Turns out I missed the most important part - the main feature gate checking pass.
use structured suggestion for method calls
Furthermore, don't suggest calling the method if it is part of a place
expression, as this is invalid syntax.
I'm thinking it might be worth putting a label on the method assignment span like "this is a method" and removing the span from the "methods are immutable" text so it isn't reported twice.
The suggestions in `src/test/ui/did_you_mean/issue-40396.stderr` are suboptimal. I could check if the containing expression is `BinOp`, but I'm not sure if that's general enough. Any ideas?
r? @estebank
Fix#56806 by using `delay_span_bug` in object safety layout sanity checks
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait method that with an invalid receiver type. This caused an ICE in #56806, because `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` for `self: Box<dyn Trait>`, which causes one of the layout sanity checks in object_safety.rs to fail. Replacing `bug!` with `delay_span_bug` solves this.
The fact that `receiver_is_dispatchable` returns `true` here could be considered a bug. It passes the check that the method implements, though: `Box<dyn Trait>` implements `DispatchFromDyn<Box<dyn Trait>>` because `dyn Trait` implements `Unsize<dyn Trait>`. It would be good to hear what @eddyb and @nikomatsakis think.
Note that I only added a test for the case encountered in #56806. I could not come up with a case that triggered an ICE from the other check, `bug!("receiver when Self = dyn Trait should be ScalarPair, found Scalar")`. There is no way, to my knowledge, that you can make `receiver_is_dispatchable` return true but still have a `Scalar` ABI when `Self = dyn Trait`.
One other case I encountered while debugging #56806 was that if you have a type parameter `T` that implements `Deref<Target=Self>` and `DispatchFromDyn<T>`, and use it as a method receiver, it will cause an ICE during `is_object_safe` because `T` has no layout ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=d9b7497b3be0ca8382fa7d9497263214)):
```rust
trait Trait<T: Deref<Target=Self> + DispatchFromDyn<T>> {
fn foo(self: T) -> dyn Trait<T>;
}
```
I don't intend to remove the ICE there because it is a pathological case, especially since there is no way to implement `DispatchFromDyn<T>` for `T` — the checks in typeck/coherence/builtin.rs do not allow that.
fixes#56806
r? @varkor
NLL: Add closure cannot be moved note.
Fixes#57098.
This PR extends existing logic for checking whether a closure that
is `FnOnce` and therefore moves variables that it captures from the
environment has already been invoked when being invoked again.
Now, this logic will also check whether the closure is being moved after
previously being moved or invoked and add an appropriate note.
r? @pnkfelix
Add support for trait-objects without a principal
The hard-error version of #56481 - should be merged after we do something about the `traitobject` crate.
Fixes#33140.
Fixes#57057.
r? @nikomatsakis
Implement the Re-rebalance coherence RFC
This is the first time I touch anything in the compiler so just tell me if I got something wrong.
Big thanks to @sgrif for the pointers where to look for those things.
cc #55437
It's possible that `is_object_safe` is called on a trait that is ill-formed, and we shouldn't ICE unless there are no errors being raised. Using `delay_span_bug` solves this.
fixes#56806
This commit improves the logic for place descriptions in conflicting
borrow errors so that borrows of union fields have better messages even
when the unions are embedded in other unions or structs.
make `panictry!` private to libsyntax
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
This commit reverses the variance used when relating types from the type
annotation of an associated constant - this matches the behaviour of the
lexical borrow checker and fixes a bug whereby matching a `&'a str`
against a `&'static str` would produce an error.
Universes
This PR transitions the compiler to use **universes** instead of the **leak-check**. It is marked as [WIP] for a few reasons:
- The diagnostics at present are terrible =)
- This changes the behavior of coherence, regressing some things that used to compile
The goals of this PR at present are:
- To start getting some eyes on the code
- To do a crater run
- To see the full travis results (due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52452, I am not able to run the full test suite locally anymore at present)
The first few commits in the PR are changing how `evaluate` treats regions. We now track whether region comparisons occurred, reverting the "staticized" query approach that @arielb1 put in. The problem with "staticized" queries is that it relied on the leak-check to get higher-ranked things correct, and we are removing the leak-check in this PR series, so that caused problems.
You can see at the end a collection of test updates. Mostly we behave the same but with atrocious diagnostics, but there are a number of cases where we used to error and now no longer do, as well as single case where we used to **not** error but we now do (the coherence-subtyping change).
(Note: it would be possible to do a version of leak-check that propagates universe information and recover the old behavior. I am reluctant to do so because I'd like to leave us room to get more precise -- e.g., I want to eventually handle things like `exists<'a> { for<'b> { if ('a: 'b) { 'a: 'b } } }` which presently the leak-check cannot cope with etc. Also because it seems more consistent to me: most folks I've talked to expect the new behavior and are surprised to learn that binding sites were so significant before when it comes to coherence. One question is, though, to what extent are people relying on this in the wild?)
When we coerce `dyn Foo` to `dyn Bar`, that is OK as long as `Foo` is
usable in all contexts where `Bar` is usable (hence using the source
must be a subtype of the target).
This is needed for the universe-based code to handle
`old-lub-glb-object`; that test used to work sort of by accident
before with the old code.
Previously, evaluation ignored outlives relationships. Since we using
evaluation to skip the "normal" trait selection (which enforces
outlives relationships) this led to incorrect results in some cases.
This commit completely removes usage of the `panictry!` macro from
outside libsyntax. The macro causes parse errors to be fatal, so using
it in libsyntax_ext caused parse failures *within* a syntax extension to
be fatal, which is probably not intended.
Furthermore, this commit adds spans to diagnostics emitted by empty
extensions if they were missing, à la #56491.
Improve type mismatch error messages
Closes#56115.
Replace "integral variable" with "integer" and replace "floating-point variable" with "floating-point number" to make the message less confusing.
TODO the book and clippy needs to be changed accordingly later.
r? @varkor
NLL: User type annotations refactor, associated constant patterns and ref bindings.
Fixes#55511 and Fixes#55401. Contributes to #54943.
This PR performs a large refactoring on user type annotations, checks user type annotations for associated constants in patterns and that user type annotations for `ref` bindings are respected.
r? @nikomatsakis
resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
privacy: Use common `DefId` visiting infrastructure for all privacy visitors
One repeating pattern in privacy checking is going through a type, visiting all `DefId`s inside it and doing something with them.
This is the case because visibilities and reachabilities are attached to `DefId`s.
Previously various privacy visitors visited types slightly differently using their own methods, with most recently written `TypePrivacyVisitor` being the "gold standard".
This mostly worked okay, but differences could manifest in overly conservative reachability analysis, some errors being reported twice, some private-in-public lints (not errors) being wrongly reported or not reported.
This PR does something that I wanted to do since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32674#discussion_r58291608 - factoring out the common visiting logic!
Now all the common logic is contained in `struct DefIdVisitorSkeleton`, with specific privacy visitors deciding only what to do with visited `DefId`s (via `trait DefIdVisitor`).
A bunch of cleanups is also applied in the process.
This area is somewhat tricky due to lots of easily miss-able details, but thankfully it's was well covered by tests in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46083 and previous PRs, so I'm relatively sure in the refactoring correctness.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/56837#discussion_r241962239 in particular.
Also this will help with implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054.
This commit buffers the errors output by the `rustc_dump_user_substs`
attribute so that they can be output in order of span and would
therefore be consistent.
This commit stops well-formedness checking applying to unreachable code
and therefore stops some of the ICEs that the intended solution taken by
this PR causes.
By disabling these checks, we can land the other fixes and larger
refactors that this PR includes.
This commit moves well-formedness check for the
`UserTypeAnnotation::Ty(..)` case from always running to only when the
code is reachable. This solves the ICE that resulted from
`src/test/ui/issue-54943-1.rs` (a minimal repro of `dropck-eyepatch`
run-pass tests that failed).
The main well-formedness check that was intended to be run despite
unreachable code still is, that being the
`UserTypeAnnotation::TypeOf(..)` case. Before this PR, the other case
wasn't being checked at all.
It is possible to fix this ICE while still always checking
well-formedness for the `UserTypeAnnotation::Ty(..)` case but that
solution will ICE in unreachable code for that case, the diff for
that change [can be found here](0).
[0]: https://gist.github.com/davidtwco/f9751ffd9c0508f7251c0f17adc3af53
This commit adds support for user type annotations in variables declared
using `ref` bindings. When a variable declared using a `ref` binding,
then the `LocalDecl` has the type `&T` where the `&` was introduced by
the `ref` binding but the canonicalized type annotation has only a
`T` since the reference is implicit with the `ref` binding.
Therefore, to support type annotations, the canonicalized type
annotation either needs wrapped in a reference, or the `LocalDecl` type
must have a wrapped reference removed for comparison. It is easier to
remove the outer reference from the `LocalDecl` for the purpose of
comparison, so that is the approach this commit takes.
This commit uses the map introduced by the previous commit to ensure
that types are always checked for well-formedness by the NLL type check.
Previously, without the map introduced by the previous commit, types
would not be checked for well-formedness if the `AscribeUserType`
statement that would trigger that check was removed as unreachable code.
This commit refactors the `UserTypeAnnotation` type to be referred to by
an index within `UserTypeProjection`. `UserTypeAnnotation` is instead
kept in an `IndexVec` within the `Mir` struct.
Further, instead of `UserTypeAnnotation` containing canonicalized types,
it now contains normal types and the entire `UserTypeAnnotation` is
canonicalized. To support this, the type was moved from the `rustc::mir`
module to `rustc::ty` module.
resolve: Fix one more ICE in import validation
So if you have an unresolved import
```rust
mod m {
use foo::bar;
}
```
error recovery will insert a special item with `Def::Err` definition into module `m`, so other things depending on `bar` won't produce extra errors.
The issue was that erroneous `bar` was overwriting legitimate `bar`s coming from globs, e.g.
```rust
mod m {
use baz::*; // imports real existing `bar`
use foo::bar;
}
```
causing some unwanted diagnostics talking about "unresolved items", and producing inconsistent resolutions like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015.
This PR stops overwriting real successful resolutions with `Def::Err`s.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57015
Implement RFC 2338, "Type alias enum variants"
This PR implements [RFC 2338](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2338), allowing one to write code like the following.
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_enum_variants)]
enum Foo {
Bar(i32),
Baz { i: i32 },
}
type Alias = Foo;
fn main() {
let t = Alias::Bar(0);
let t = Alias::Baz { i: 0 };
match t {
Alias::Bar(_i) => {}
Alias::Baz { i: _i } => {}
}
}
```
Since `Self` can be considered a type alias in this context, it also enables using `Self::Variant` as both a constructor and pattern.
Fixes issues #56199 and #56611.
N.B., after discussing the syntax for type arguments on enum variants with @petrochenkov and @eddyb (there are also a few comments on the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49683)), the consensus seems to be treat the syntax as follows, which ought to be backwards-compatible.
```rust
Option::<u8>::None; // OK
Option::None::<u8>; // OK, but lint in near future (hard error next edition?)
Alias::<u8>::None; // OK
Alias::None::<u8>; // Error
```
I do not know if this will need an FCP, but let's start one if so.
resolve: Fix another ICE in import validation
Imports are allowed to have ambiguous resolutions as long as all of them have same `Def`.
As it turned out, it's possible for different `Module`s to have same `Def` when `extern crate` items are involved.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56596
Resolve `$crate`s for pretty-printing at more appropriate time
Doing it in `BuildReducedGraphVisitor` wasn't a good idea, identifiers wasn't actually visited half of the time.
As a result some `$crate`s weren't resolved and were therefore pretty-printed as `$crate` literally, which turns into two tokens during re-parsing of the pretty-printed text.
Now we are visiting and resolving `$crate` identifiers in an item right before sending that item to a proc macro attribute or derive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57089
AST/HIR: Introduce `ExprKind::Err` for better error recovery in the front-end
This way we can avoid aborting compilation if expansion produces errors and generate `ExprKind::Err`s instead.
When a format string has escaped whitespace characters format
arguments were shifted by one per each escaped character. Account
for these escaped characters when synthesizing the spans.
Fix#55155.
- Point at opening mismatched formatting brace
- Account for differences between raw and regular strings
- Account for differences between the code snippet and `InternedString`
- Add more tests
