Regarding [#29063 _[Docs] Terminology inconsistency between 'iterator adapters' and 'iterator adaptors'_](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29063) :
This PR replaces 'iterator adapters' appearances (in TRPL book) to 'iterator adaptors', thus embracing the terminology used along the API docs and achieving consistency between both sources.
Before this commit, the first "A Rust library" code sample produced
the following compilation warning:
```
test.rs:7:22: 7:36 warning: unnecessary parentheses around `for` head
expression, #[warn(unused_parens)] on by default
test.rs:7 for _ in (0..5_000_000) {
```
This commit just removes the parens around the range 0..5_000_000 thereby removing the compilation warning.
Fixes#28676.
There doesn't seem to be a good way to add a test for this, but I tested the repro in #28676 and confirmed it now yields the correct result.
Regarding #29063: Replace 'iterator adapters' appearances to
'iterator adaptors', thus embracing the terminology used along the
API docs and achieving consistency between both sources.
Before this commit, the first "A Rust library" code sample produced
the following compilation warning:
```
test.rs:7:22: 7:36 warning: unnecessary parentheses around `for` head
expression, #[warn(unused_parens)] on by default
test.rs:7 for _ in (0..5_000_000) {
```
This commit just removes the parens around the range 0..5_000_000.
This is needed as item types are allowed to be unnormalized.
Fixes an ICE that occurs when foreign function signatures contained
an associated type.
Fixes#28983
Due to the way iterators work, the std::iter module is chock full of
structs that you, humble Rust programmer, will never actually use.
However, they have URLs, and therefore get linked to, because they are
real structs that do exist.
So, rather than just have a tiny sentence about each one of them,
this patch adds links back to the functions and methods on Iterator
which actually create the structs, where helpful documentation already
exists.
r? @steveklabnik
The link is broken here: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/io/#types>.
Looks like crate documentation generator uses only first paragraph of the module documentation and
so doesn't resolve the link defined below.
Probably this behaviour of the documentation generator should be considered as a bug and should be reported.
This rather crucial requirement was not checked. In most cases, that
didn't cause any trouble because the argument types are required to
outlive the call and are subtypes of a subformula of the callee type.
However, binary ops are taken by ref only indirectly, without it being
marked in the argument types, which led to the argument types not being
constrained anywhere causing spurious errors (as these are basically
unconstrainable, I don't think this change can break code). Of course,
the old way was also incorrent with contravariance, but that is still
unsound for other reasons.
This also improves rustc::front to get RUST_LOG to *somewhat* work.
Fixes#28999. That issue is one of the several regression introduced by #28669.
r? @pnkfelix
Hi Rustaceans!
This is the second version of running rustfmt on liblog https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/28898. There are only rustfmt suggested changes. Because I think that some patterns here (that I fixed up in the prev PR need to be discussed in detail.
//cc @nrc
